Lisa Murkowski (R-AK)
Promoting Strong Native Families and Children Act
A Republican bill with 3 Democratic cosponsors · See all 4 cosponsors
Last activity — Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
In committee
Introduced and handed to a committee in the chamber it started in.
The committee holds it, and most bills are never heard from again. A hearing or a committee vote would be news; silence is the usual outcome, and it kills the bill without anyone voting against it.
Its path through Congress
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
The "Promoting Strong Native Families and Children Act" aims to remove administrative barriers and increase federal funding for Indian tribal child welfare programs. It adjusts grant allotment formulas to provide specific base amounts plus funding based on tribal populations. The bill increases set-aside percentages for various child welfare programs and allows tribes to use funds for customary adoptions. It also grants the Secretary authority to waive matching requirements and provides more funding for tribal court improvements. Additionally, the legislation creates a mechanism for direct social services block grants to tribes and allows for prevention-only service programs.
Yes· 3 of 7
- Scored +9
Would Native Americans be better off under this?
The bill significantly increases funding, administrative flexibility, and authority for Indian tribes and their social services.
- Scored +8
Would children be better off under this?
The bill increases funding and resources specifically for tribal child welfare and prevention services.
- Scored +6
Would people in rural areas be better off under this?
Increased funding for tribal programs benefits many residents living in rural tribal lands.
The opposite
No question was scored the opposite.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Increased Funding for Tribal Programs: The bill increases the tribal set-aside for the Stephanie Tubbs Jones Child Welfare Services Program from 3 percent to 5 percent (Section 2(e)).
-
Increased Funding for Safe and Stable Families: The bill increases the tribal set-aside for Mandatory Funding and Discretionary Funding for the Promote Safe and Stable Families program from 3 percent to 5 percent (Section 2(c) and 2(d)).
-
Support for Tribal Traditions: An Indian tribe or tribal consortium may now use provided amounts to facilitate and support tribal customary adoptions (Section 2(b)).
-
Improved Tribal Court Resources: Funding for the Tribal Court Improvement Program is increased from $2,000,000 per year to $5,000,000 for fiscal year 2026 and each year thereafter (Section 2(i)).
-
Flexibility in Financial Requirements: The Secretary is granted authority to waive or modify matching requirements for the Stephanie Tubbs Jones and Marylee Allen programs if it fits the specific needs, culture, and circumstances of a tribe (Section 2(g)).
-
Direct Support through Block Grants: The bill authorizes the Secretary to make grants directly to Indian tribes or tribal consortia for planning and carrying out programs, including those involving cultural preservation and traditional practices (Section 3).
-
Expanded Service Options: Tribes, organizations, or consortia may elect to provide prevention services and programs as an independent program without needing to submit a plan for foster care, adoption, or kinship guardianship (Section 4(a)).
-
Recognition of Tribal Caseworkers: States may elect to include visits made by tribal child welfare agency caseworkers to satisfy monthly caseworker visit requirements, provided there is a coordinated data-sharing agreement (Section 5).
Potential Negative Impacts for People
- No specific negative impacts or burdens are explicitly detailed in the provided text.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Tap or hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Would Native Americans be better off under this? — The bill significantly increases funding, administrative flexibility, and authority for Indian tribes and their social services. Would children be better off under this? — The bill increases funding and resources specifically for tribal child welfare and prevention services. Would people in rural areas be better off under this? — Increased funding for tribal programs benefits many residents living in rural tribal lands. Would households on low incomes be better off under this? — Increased social services block grants and child welfare funding can benefit low-income families. Would people in cities be better off under this? — The bill's focus is primarily on tribal and rural community infrastructure rather than urban centers.
- Economy And Finance
- Does this make the government pay for what it commits to? — The bill increases federal spending through higher set-aside percentages and increased funding for tribal programs.
- Social Issues And Justice
- Is this likely to lift people out of poverty? — Increased funding for tribal child welfare and social services block grants supports family stability.
- 6/11/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 5/21/2026
- Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
- 3 Cosponsors added.
- Introduced in Senate
Catherine Cortez MastoDemocrat · Nevada
Ben LujánDemocrat · New Mexico
Brian SchatzDemocrat · Hawaii
Dan SullivanRepublican · Alaska