Chuck Grassley (R-IA)· Mar 14, 2025
S.Amdt. 1237: To improve the bill.
Not adopted
Considered by Senate. (consideration: CR S1765)
A Republican bill with 6 Democratic cosponsors · See all 31 cosponsors
Last activity — Became Public Law No: 119-26.
Became law
Passed both chambers and was signed by the President, or became law without a signature.
Nothing more in Congress: it is law. When it takes effect depends on the dates written into it — some parts start at once, others a year or more later.
This bill is known as the Halt All Lethal Trafficking of Fentanyl Act or the HALT Fentanyl Act. It permanently places all fentanyl-related substances into schedule I of the Controlled Substances Act. The legislation creates streamlined and expedited registration processes for researchers studying these controlled substances. It allows certain research institutions to share registrations among employees and use a single registration for multiple sites within the same city or county. The bill also explicitly applies federal criminal penalties for manufacturing, distributing, importing, or exporting to any fentanyl-related substance. Finally, it directs the Attorney General to issue interim final rules to implement the changes within six months.
Does this do more about addiction and overdose deaths?
The act directly attempts to combat the fentanyl crisis by increasing penalties and attempting to decrease availablity.
Does this make mental health care easier to get?
Expedited research on Schedule I substances, including fentanyl, could speed up the development of treatments for addiction and overdose.
Does this put more money into medical research?
The bill streamlines research processes for schedule I substances, indirectly incentivizing funding.
Does this shorten or soften prison sentences?
Increased penalties for fentanyl-related substances could lead to longer prison sentences, hindering criminal sentencing reform efforts.
Would households on low incomes be better off under this?
Increased penalties could disproportionately affect low-income households due to the higher likelihood of being involved in the criminal justice system.
Would Black Americans be better off under this?
Increased penalties could disproportionately affect African Americans due to existing racial disparities in the criminal justice system.
4 recorded votes have been taken on this bill. 2 of them decided something; the rest moved it along.
03/14/2025 · Roll call 127 · recorded as “On Passage of the Bill S. 331”
06/12/2025 · Roll call 166 · recorded as “On Passage”
03/06/2025 · Roll call 110 · recorded as “On Cloture on the Motion to Proceed S. 331”
03/13/2025 · Roll call 124 · recorded as “On the Cloture Motion S. 331”
Expedited Research Processes: Section 3(a) introduces special provisions allowing researchers conducting specific types of studies, such as those backed by federal grants or investigating authorized drugs, to use expedited notice procedures to get registered. This could benefit the public by speeding up the scientific understanding and development of treatments related to fentanyl.
Reduced Red Tape for Research Institutions: Section 3(b) and Section 3(c) allow agents or employees of a research institution to operate under an existing researcher's registration without getting a separate one, and permit a researcher to use a single registration across multiple sites within the same city or county. This cuts down on unnecessary paperwork and administrative burdens for scientific researchers.
Transparency from Officials: Section 3(g) requires the Attorney General to make public on the Drug Enforcement Administration website the identities of all substances subject to unique research processes, along with the criteria used. This provision holds our elected and appointed officials accountable by forcing them to be transparent about how research applications are handled.
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Tap or hover a score for the reason it gave.
The text as it became law
The final version, on its way to the President
Chuck Grassley (R-IA)· Mar 14, 2025
Not adopted
Considered by Senate. (consideration: CR S1765)
2 bills Congress.gov lists as related to this one — companions in the other chamber, earlier versions, and bills this one absorbed or was folded into.
Republican · Tennessee
Republican · Alabama
Republican · Maine
Republican · West Virginia
Republican · Texas
Republican · Texas
Democrat · Nevada
Republican · Montana
Republican · Iowa
Republican · South Carolina
Republican · Iowa
Democrat · Arizona
Democrat · New Mexico
Democrat · New Hampshire
Republican · Mississippi
Republican · Missouri
Republican · West Virginia
Democrat · Arizona
Independent · Maine
Republican · Louisiana
Republican · Utah
Republican · Kansas
Republican · Pennsylvania
Republican · Florida
Republican · South Dakota
Republican · Nebraska
Democrat · New Hampshire
Republican · Alaska
Republican · Missouri
Republican · North Carolina
Republican · Indiana