Ted Cruz (R-TX)
A bill to amend title 18, United States Code, to include rioting in the definition of racketeering activity.
A Republican bill with 14 Republican cosponsors · See all 14 cosponsors
Last activity — Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
In committee
Introduced and handed to a committee in the chamber it started in.
The committee holds it, and most bills are never heard from again. A hearing or a committee vote would be news; silence is the usual outcome, and it kills the bill without anyone voting against it.
Its path through Congress
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
This bill, S. 2376, aims to amend title 18 of the United States Code to include rioting in the definition of racketeering activity. It was introduced in the Senate on July 22, 2025, and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary. The change would be made by amending Section 1961(1) of title 18.
Yes
- Scored +3
Does this give the federal government more power?
The bill expands federal power by including rioting under the definition of racketeering, increasing federal jurisdiction over such activities.
The opposite· 3 of 12
- Scored -4
Does this shorten or soften prison sentences?
By including rioting in racketeering activity, the bill could lead to increased sentences, going against the goals of criminal sentencing reform.
- Scored -3
Would Black Americans be better off under this?
The bill's expansion of racketeering to include rioting could disproportionately affect African American communities, potentially leading to more severe penalties for those involved in protests or civil unrest.
- Scored -3
Does this narrow racial gaps in how people are treated?
The bill's expansion of racketeering to include rioting could disproportionately affect minority communities, potentially leading to more severe penalties for those involved in protests or civil unrest.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
The bill doesn't have clearly stated positive impacts for specific people.
Potential Negative Impacts for People
- By including rioting in the definition of racketeering activity, Section 1 of the bill could lead to harsher penalties for individuals involved in riots. This might be considered negative as it broadens the scope of racketeering charges to include those participating in activities classified as riots under section 2101.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Tap or hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Would Black Americans be better off under this? — The bill's expansion of racketeering to include rioting could disproportionately affect African American communities, potentially leading to more severe penalties for those involved in protests or civil unrest. Would Hispanic Americans be better off under this? — The bill's expansion of racketeering to include rioting could disproportionately affect Hispanic American communities, potentially leading to more severe penalties for those involved in protests or civil unrest. Would households on low incomes be better off under this? — Low-income individuals who participate in protests may be disproportionately affected by the increased penalties associated with racketeering charges. Would people in cities be better off under this? — Urban residents may be disproportionately affected by the increased penalties associated with racketeering charges due to higher population density and protest activity. Would people in their twenties and thirties be better off under this? — Young adults, who are more likely to participate in protests, may face harsher penalties under this law if protests are classified as riots. Would students be better off under this? — Students who participate in protests may face harsher penalties under this law if protests are classified as riots.
- Social Issues And Justice
- Does this shorten or soften prison sentences? — By including rioting in racketeering activity, the bill could lead to increased sentences, going against the goals of criminal sentencing reform. Does this protect what people are allowed to say in public life? — The bill could potentially chill freedom of speech if people are afraid to attend a protest that turns into a riot. Does this narrow racial gaps in how people are treated? — The bill's expansion of racketeering to include rioting could disproportionately affect minority communities, potentially leading to more severe penalties for those involved in protests or civil unrest. Does this change how police departments operate? — The bill's focus on harsher penalties for rioting may undermine efforts to address police misconduct and reform policing practices.
- Governance And Ideology
- Does this give the federal government more power? — The bill expands federal power by including rioting under the definition of racketeering, increasing federal jurisdiction over such activities. Does this protect the individual right to speak freely? — The bill could potentially chill freedom of speech if people are afraid to attend a protest that turns into a riot. Does this protect the right to fair treatment by the courts? — The broad definition of rioting could lead to potential due process concerns if individuals are charged based on minimal involvement.
- 11/9/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 6/10/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 3/24/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 2/11/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 2/5/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 11/3/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 10/30/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 9/18/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 7/22/2025
- Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
- 6 Cosponsors added.
- Introduced in Senate
One bill Congress.gov lists as related to this one — companions in the other chamber, earlier versions, and bills this one absorbed or was folded into.
Marsha BlackburnRepublican · Tennessee
Jim BanksRepublican · Indiana
Ted BuddRepublican · North Carolina
Katie BrittRepublican · Alabama
John CornynRepublican · Texas
Bill HagertyRepublican · Tennessee
Josh HawleyRepublican · Missouri
John KennedyRepublican · Louisiana
Mike LeeRepublican · Utah
Bernie MorenoRepublican · Ohio
David McCormickRepublican · Pennsylvania
Ashley MoodyRepublican · Florida
Tommy TubervilleRepublican · Alabama
Thomas TillisRepublican · North Carolina