Alex Padilla (D-CA)

Asunción Valdivia Heat Illness, Injury, and Fatality Prevention Act of 2025

S. 2298 · Senate bill Labor and Employment

A Democratic bill with 26 Democratic cosponsors · See all 27 cosponsors

Last activity — Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions. (Sponsor introductory remarks on measure: CR S4421-4422)

In committee

Introduced and handed to a committee in the chamber it started in.

The committee holds it, and most bills are never heard from again. A hearing or a committee vote would be news; silence is the usual outcome, and it kills the bill without anyone voting against it.

Its path through Congress

  1. Introduced
  2. In Committee

What this bill would do

This bill, known as the "Asuncion Valdivia Heat Illness, Injury, and Fatality Prevention Act of 2025," directs the Secretary of Labor to create safety standards to protect workers from heat-related injuries and illnesses. It requires employers to provide a workplace free from conditions that could cause death or serious harm from heat stress. The Secretary is tasked with developing protective programs that include measures like engineering controls, administrative changes, and personal protective equipment. The Act also mandates specific core practices such as providing water, rest breaks, and shade. Additionally, it includes provisions for training, heat illness prevention plans, and whistleblower protections. The goal is to establish a high degree of health and safety protection for employees facing heat stress.

Yes

  • Scored +7

    Does this give the federal government more power?

    The bill expands federal authority by directing the Secretary of Labor to establish new occupational safety standards.

  • Scored +6

    Would union members be better off under this?

    The bill enhances worker protections and provides clear rights regarding pay during heat-related rest periods.

  • Scored +5

    Does this make what the government does easier for the public to see?

    The bill includes specific transparency requirements for the rulemaking process.

The opposite

  • Scored -5

    Would business owners be better off under this?

    Employers face increased operational costs related to mandatory heat protection and training requirements.