A Democratic bill with 33 Democratic cosponsors · See all 34 cosponsors
Last activity — Read twice and referred to the Committee on Armed Services.
In committee
Introduced and handed to a committee in the chamber it started in.
The committee holds it, and most bills are never heard from again. A hearing or a committee vote would be news; silence is the usual outcome, and it kills the bill without anyone voting against it.
Its path through Congress
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
This bill is cited as the Fit to Serve Act. It amends title 10 of the United States Code to stop discrimination in the Armed Forces based on gender identity. The bill blocks the Secretary concerned from using gender identity, including a diagnosis of gender dysphoria, to create service qualifications. It also prevents the military from involuntarily separating members based on these grounds. Additionally, the text bans denying medically necessary health care coverage or forcing members to serve in the sex assigned at birth. Finally, it stops the denial of joining, reenlisting, or continuing service, and general discrimination on the basis of gender identity.
Yes· 3 of 10
- Scored +10
Would LGBTQ people be better off under this?
Directly prohibits discrimination and ensures health care for gender-diverse service members.
- Scored +10
Does this expand the rights of LGBTQ people?
Prohibits discrimination and involuntary separation based on gender identity in the military.
- Scored +8
Does this narrow the gap between how men and women are treated?
Protects individuals from being forced to serve in the sex assigned at birth.
The opposite
No question was scored the opposite.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
- This provision stops the military from using gender identity to set service qualifications or to deny joining, reenlisting, or continuing service, which benefits individuals who want to serve in the Armed Forces.
Section 975(a)(2)
- This section stops the military from involuntarily separating a member of the Armed Forces based on gender identity, protecting current service members from losing their jobs for this reason.
Section 975(a)(3)
- This provision bans the denial of medically necessary health care coverage to a member of the Armed Forces based on gender identity, ensuring service members can get the health care they need.
Section 975(a)(4)
- This part stops the military from requiring an individual to serve in the sex assigned at birth, giving service members the ability to serve without that specific restriction.
Potential Negative Impacts for People
- Based strictly on the provided text, there are no specific sections or provisions identified that outline negative consequences or burdens for individuals or groups.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Tap or hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Would LGBTQ people be better off under this? — Directly prohibits discrimination and ensures health care for gender-diverse service members. Would men be better off under this? — Increases protections and autonomy for transgender men in the military. Would women be better off under this? — Increases protections and autonomy for transgender women in the military. Would people in their twenties and thirties be better off under this? — Protects young adults entering military service from gender-based discrimination.
- Social Issues And Justice
- Does this expand the rights of LGBTQ people? — Prohibits discrimination and involuntary separation based on gender identity in the military. Does this narrow the gap between how men and women are treated? — Protects individuals from being forced to serve in the sex assigned at birth.
- Healthcare
- Does this make health care easier to get in general? — Ensures military members cannot be denied medically necessary care based on gender identity. Does this make mental health care easier to get? — Prohibits denial of medically necessary health care for gender dysphoria.
- Governance And Ideology
- Does this protect the right to fair treatment by the courts? — Prevents arbitrary involuntary separation of service members based on gender identity. Does this give the federal government more power? — Sets a federal standard for non-discrimination across all branches of the Armed Forces.
- 11/9/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 9/29/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 9/28/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 9/23/2026
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 9/16/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 9/14/2026
- 3 Cosponsors added.
- 8/7/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 8/6/2026
- 3 Cosponsors added.
- 8/4/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 7/29/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 7/28/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 7/20/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 12/11/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 12/3/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 6/12/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 6/10/2025
- Read twice and referred to the Committee on Armed Services.
- 14 Cosponsors added.
- Introduced in Senate
One bill Congress.gov lists as related to this one — companions in the other chamber, earlier versions, and bills this one absorbed or was folded into.
Angela AlsobrooksDemocrat · Maryland
Tammy BaldwinDemocrat · Wisconsin
Richard BlumenthalDemocrat · Connecticut
Cory BookerDemocrat · New Jersey
Lisa Blunt RochesterDemocrat · Delaware
Christopher CoonsDemocrat · Delaware
Catherine Cortez MastoDemocrat · Nevada
Richard DurbinDemocrat · Illinois
Tammy DuckworthDemocrat · Illinois
John FettermanDemocrat · Pennsylvania
Kirsten GillibrandDemocrat · New York
John HickenlooperDemocrat · Colorado
Mazie HironoDemocrat · Hawaii
Martin HeinrichDemocrat · New Mexico
Mark KellyDemocrat · Arizona
Andy KimDemocrat · New Jersey
Ben LujánDemocrat · New Mexico
Edward MarkeyDemocrat · Massachusetts
Patty MurrayDemocrat · Washington
Christopher MurphyDemocrat · Connecticut
Jeff MerkleyDemocrat · Oregon
Alex PadillaDemocrat · California
John ReedDemocrat · Rhode Island
Jacky RosenDemocrat · Nevada
Bernie SandersIndependent · Vermont
Adam SchiffDemocrat · California
Jeanne ShaheenDemocrat · New Hampshire
Brian SchatzDemocrat · Hawaii
Tina SmithDemocrat · Minnesota
Elissa SlotkinDemocrat · Michigan
Chris Van HollenDemocrat · Maryland
Ron WydenDemocrat · Oregon
Peter WelchDemocrat · Vermont
Sheldon WhitehouseDemocrat · Rhode Island