David McCormick (R-PA)
Access to Small Business Investor Capital Act
A Republican bill with 9 Democratic cosponsors · See all 17 cosponsors
Last activity — Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
In committee
Introduced and handed to a committee in the chamber it started in.
The committee holds it, and most bills are never heard from again. A hearing or a committee vote would be news; silence is the usual outcome, and it kills the bill without anyone voting against it.
Its path through Congress
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
This bill, known as the "Access to Small Business Investor Capital Act," aims to change how investment companies report certain costs. It would allow a registered investment company to omit specific fees from their calculations. Specifically, these omitted fees would be those incurred indirectly from investing in shares of a business development company. This change applies to investment company registration statements filed under the Investment Company Act of 1940.
Yes· 3 of 5
- Scored +3
Does this make it easier to run a small business?
The bill aims to facilitate investment in business development companies which provide capital to small businesses.
- Scored +2
Would business owners be better off under this?
Small business owners who utilize business development companies may see easier access to capital.
- Scored +1
Would high-income households be better off under this?
The policy primarily benefits those engaged in investment activities involving registered investment companies.
The opposite
- Scored -2
Does this make what the government does easier for the public to see?
By allowing the omission of certain fees, the bill may reduce the level of detailed expense transparency for investors.
- Scored -1
Does this give people more protection from unfair business practices?
Reducing fee transparency requirements may slightly decrease the clarity of costs for investors.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
- Flexibility in Fee Reporting: A registered investment company may omit certain fees and expenses from their calculation if those fees were incurred indirectly due to investments in one or more business development companies. (Section 2(b))
Potential Negative Impacts for People
- No specific negative impacts or burdens are mentioned in the provided text.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Tap or hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Would business owners be better off under this? — Small business owners who utilize business development companies may see easier access to capital. Would high-income households be better off under this? — The policy primarily benefits those engaged in investment activities involving registered investment companies. Would people with substantial wealth be better off under this? — The change affects how investment companies disclose fees related to their holdings.
- Economy And Finance
- Does this make it easier to run a small business? — The bill aims to facilitate investment in business development companies which provide capital to small businesses. Is this likely to grow the economy? — By easing fee reporting for investment companies, it may marginally improve liquidity and capital flow into business development companies. Does this give people more protection from unfair business practices? — Reducing fee transparency requirements may slightly decrease the clarity of costs for investors.
- Governance And Ideology
- Does this make what the government does easier for the public to see? — By allowing the omission of certain fees, the bill may reduce the level of detailed expense transparency for investors.
- 6/18/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 4/21/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 1/30/2026
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 1/29/2026
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 1/13/2026
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 9/29/2025
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 9/16/2025
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 7/21/2025
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 6/4/2025
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 5/20/2025
- Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- Introduced in Senate
One bill Congress.gov lists as related to this one — companions in the other chamber, earlier versions, and bills this one absorbed or was folded into.
Angela AlsobrooksDemocrat · Maryland
Jim BanksRepublican · Indiana
Lisa Blunt RochesterDemocrat · Delaware
Katie BrittRepublican · Alabama
Steve DainesRepublican · Montana
Ruben GallegoDemocrat · Arizona
John HickenlooperDemocrat · Colorado
Bill HagertyRepublican · Tennessee
Maggie HassanDemocrat · New Hampshire
Jon HustedRepublican · Ohio
James JusticeRepublican · West Virginia
John KennedyRepublican · Louisiana
Andy KimDemocrat · New Jersey
Bernie MorenoRepublican · Ohio
Jacky RosenDemocrat · Nevada
Jeanne ShaheenDemocrat · New Hampshire
Mark WarnerDemocrat · Virginia