Brad Sherman (D-CA)
Access to Small Business Investor Capital Act
A Democratic bill with 9 Republican cosponsors · See all 25 cosponsors
Last activity — Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
In the other chamber's committee
Passed one chamber and has been handed to a committee in the other.
The committee decides whether it goes any further, and most bills that reach a committee never leave it. A committee that simply does nothing kills a bill without anyone ever voting against it, so no news from here is usually the news.
Its path through Congress
- Introduced
- Passed House voice vote
- In Senate committee
The House by voice vote (members called out yes or no together): no member's position on it was recorded.
What this bill would do
This Act is titled the "Access to Small Business Investor Capital Act." It seeks to amend how registered investment companies report certain fees and expenses. Specifically, it allows these companies to omit certain costs when calculating Acquired Fund Fees and Expenses. This omission applies to fees and expenses incurred indirectly through investments in a business development company that is an Acquired Fund.
Yes· 3 of 6
- Scored +3
Does this make it easier to run a small business?
The bill facilitates capital access by allowing easier reporting for investments in business development companies.
- Scored +2
Would business owners be better off under this?
The bill could benefit business owners by facilitating easier access to investor capital.
- Scored +1
Would high-income households be better off under this?
This may benefit high-income investors through more streamlined investment reporting for business development companies.
The opposite
- Scored -1
Does this give people more protection from unfair business practices?
Omitting specific fee disclosures may slightly reduce the transparency of total costs for investors.
- Scored -1
Does this make what the government does easier for the public to see?
The omission of certain fees from registration statements may reduce financial transparency for investors.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
- Omitting specific fees from calculations: Under Section 2(b), a registered investment company is permitted to omit fees and expenses incurred indirectly from investments in an Acquired Fund that is a business development company. This change affects how "Acquired Fund Fees and Expenses" are calculated on investment company registration statements.
Potential Negative Impacts for People
- No negative impacts or burdens are explicitly stated in the provided text.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Tap or hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Would business owners be better off under this? — The bill could benefit business owners by facilitating easier access to investor capital. Would billionaires be better off under this? — The change in reporting requirements may benefit those managing large investment portfolios. Would high-income households be better off under this? — This may benefit high-income investors through more streamlined investment reporting for business development companies. Would people with substantial wealth be better off under this? — The change in reporting requirements may benefit those managing large investment portfolios. Would the very wealthiest people be better off under this? — The change in reporting requirements may benefit those managing large investment portfolios.
- Economy And Finance
- Does this make it easier to run a small business? — The bill facilitates capital access by allowing easier reporting for investments in business development companies. Does this give people more protection from unfair business practices? — Omitting specific fee disclosures may slightly reduce the transparency of total costs for investors.
- Governance And Ideology
- Does this make what the government does easier for the public to see? — The omission of certain fees from registration statements may reduce financial transparency for investors.
- 6/24/2025
- Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
- 6/23/2025
- Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
- Passed/agreed to in House: On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended Agreed to by voice vote. (text: CR H2868)
- On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended Agreed to by voice vote. (text: CR H2868)
- DEBATE - The House proceeded with forty minutes of debate on H.R. 2225.
- Considered under suspension of the rules. (consideration: CR H2868-2869)
- Mrs. Wagner moved to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended.
- 6/3/2025
- Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Financial Services. H. Rept. 119-126.
- Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 96.
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 5/20/2025
- Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held
- Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by Voice Vote.
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 5/19/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 5/15/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 5/13/2025
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 5/7/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 4/28/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 4/21/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 4/17/2025
- 3 Cosponsors added.
- 4/10/2025
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 4/8/2025
- 4 Cosponsors added.
- 3/24/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 3/21/2025
- 3 Cosponsors added.
- 3/18/2025
- Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services.
- 3 Cosponsors added.
- Introduced in House
One bill Congress.gov lists as related to this one — companions in the other chamber, earlier versions, and bills this one absorbed or was folded into.
Andy BarrRepublican · Kentucky
Brendan BoyleDemocrat · Pennsylvania
Janelle BynumDemocrat · Oregon
Emanuel CleaverDemocrat · Missouri
Sean CastenDemocrat · Illinois
Cleo FieldsDemocrat · Louisiana
Bill FosterDemocrat · Illinois
Brian FitzpatrickRepublican · Pennsylvania
Vicente GonzalezDemocrat · Texas
Josh GottheimerDemocrat · New Jersey
Andrew GarbarinoRepublican · New York
James HimesDemocrat · Connecticut
Bill HuizengaRepublican · Michigan
Young KimRepublican · California
Gregory MeeksDemocrat · New York
Grace MengDemocrat · New York
Daniel MeuserRepublican · Pennsylvania
Zachary NunnRepublican · Iowa
Brittany PettersenDemocrat · Colorado
David ScottDemocrat · Georgia
Marilyn StricklandDemocrat · Washington
Bryan SteilRepublican · Wisconsin
Ritchie TorresDemocrat · New York
Nydia VelázquezDemocrat · New York
Ann WagnerRepublican · Missouri