A Republican bill with 1 Democratic cosponsor · See all 7 cosponsors
Last activity — ASSUMING FIRST SPONSORSHIP - Mr. Alford asked unanimous consent that he may hereafter be considered as the first sponsor of H.R. 4327, a bill originally introduced by Representative Greene (GA), for the purpose of adding cosponsors and requesting reprintings pursuant to clause 7 of rule XII. Agreed to without objection.
Introduced, nothing more yet
Formally proposed, and not yet handed to a committee.
Nearly every bill is sent to a committee within days. Introduction alone is not a sign of support, of momentum, or of any likelihood of passing — any member may introduce any bill.
Its path through Congress
- Introduced
What this bill would do
This bill, titled the No Tax on Home Sales Act, aims to change the Internal Revenue Code of 1986. Its primary purpose is to remove the current dollar limits that exist when excluding gains from the sale of a person's principal residence. The legislation includes specific instructions to amend Section 121(b) and Section 121(c) of the Code. These changes would impact how gains from home sales are treated for tax purposes. The amendments are set to apply to sales and exchanges occurring after the Act is enacted.
Yes· 3 of 14
- Scored +8
Would high-income households be better off under this?
High-income households with expensive properties receive the largest absolute dollar amount of tax savings.
- Scored +8
Would people with substantial wealth be better off under this?
The bill greatly benefits high-net-worth individuals who own high-value principal residences.
- Scored +8
Would the very wealthiest people be better off under this?
The removal of limits provides substantial tax advantages for very high-value property owners.
The opposite
- Scored -3
Does this reduce what the federal government owes?
Reducing tax revenue from home sales may negatively impact the federal budget and increase the national debt.
- Scored -2
Does this make the government pay for what it commits to?
The loss of tax revenue could be viewed as a decrease in fiscal responsibility.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
- Removal of limits on home sale gains: By striking the current paragraphs in Section 121(b), the bill eliminates the specific dollar limitations on the exclusion of gain from the sale of principal residences (Section 2(a)). This could benefit homeowners by allowing them to exclude all gains from the sale of their home regardless of the amount.
Potential Negative Impacts for People
- No negative impacts are explicitly stated in the provided text.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Tap or hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Would billionaires be better off under this? — Extremely high-value property sales will see a significant reduction in tax liability. Would high-income households be better off under this? — High-income households with expensive properties receive the largest absolute dollar amount of tax savings. Would people with substantial wealth be better off under this? — The bill greatly benefits high-net-worth individuals who own high-value principal residences. Would the very wealthiest people be better off under this? — The removal of limits provides substantial tax advantages for very high-value property owners. Would retired people be better off under this? — Retirees selling their long-term homes gain a massive tax advantage under this law. Would middle-income households be better off under this? — This provides significant relief to middle-class families selling high-value homes. Would people over 65 be better off under this? — Seniors selling long-held high-value homes will see significantly increased tax advantages. Would people in middle age be better off under this? — Middle-aged homeowners with high-value primary residences stand to benefit most from the removal of gain exclusions. Would people in cities be better off under this? — Urban residents with higher property values will see more significant tax savings from the removal of limits. Would people in rural areas be better off under this? — Rural residents with high-value properties will benefit, though often less than urban residents due to lower price differentials.
- Economy And Finance
- Does this cut the tax on profits from selling investments? — The bill effectively reduces capital gains taxes on principal residences by removing the cap on the exclusion amount. Does this cut taxes for middle-income families? — Eliminating capital gains limits on home sales provides significant tax relief for middle-class homeowners selling higher-value properties. Is this likely to grow the economy? — Increased liquidity from home sales could provide a modest stimulus to the economy. Does this reduce what the federal government owes? — Reducing tax revenue from home sales may negatively impact the federal budget and increase the national debt. Does this make the government pay for what it commits to? — The loss of tax revenue could be viewed as a decrease in fiscal responsibility.
- Social Issues And Justice
- Does this make housing cost less? — Increased home equity retention may assist with housing mobility, though the primary effect is tax-based.
- 4/9/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 3/18/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 3/12/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 1/21/2026
- ASSUMING FIRST SPONSORSHIP - Mr. Alford asked unanimous consent that he may hereafter be considered as the first sponsor of H.R. 4327, a bill originally introduced by Representative Greene (GA), for the purpose of adding cosponsors and requesting reprintings pursuant to clause 7 of rule XII. Agreed to without objection.
- 12/3/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 11/4/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 9/15/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 7/14/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 7/10/2025
- Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
- Introduced in House
2 bills Congress.gov lists as related to this one — companions in the other chamber, earlier versions, and bills this one absorbed or was folded into.
Mark AlfordRepublican · Missouri
J. CorreaDemocrat · California
Abraham HamadehRepublican · Arizona
Mark HarrisRepublican · North Carolina
Tracey MannRepublican · Kansas
Burgess OwensRepublican · Utah
David TaylorRepublican · Ohio