Craig Goldman (R-TX)
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to eliminate the dollar limitations on the exclusion of gain from sales of principal residences, and for other purposes.
A Republican bill with 6 Republican cosponsors · See all 6 cosponsors
Last activity — Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
In committee
Introduced and handed to a committee in the chamber it started in.
The committee holds it, and most bills are never heard from again. A hearing or a committee vote would be news; silence is the usual outcome, and it kills the bill without anyone voting against it.
Its path through Congress
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
This bill proposes to amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986. The primary goal is to eliminate the current dollar limitations regarding the exclusion of gain from the sale of principal residences. It involves striking specific paragraphs within Section 121(b) and redesignating others. Additionally, it includes conforming amendments to Section 121(c). These changes would apply to all sales and exchanges occurring after the Act is enacted.
Yes· 3 of 7
- Scored +8
Would people with substantial wealth be better off under this?
This bill disproportionately benefits those with significant equity in high-value residential properties.
- Scored +7
Would high-income households be better off under this?
Higher income households with more expensive principal residences benefit most from removing the cap on gain exclusions.
- Scored +6
Would people over 65 be better off under this?
Seniors often sell high-value principal residences and would benefit from the removal of gain exclusion caps.
The opposite
- Scored -3
Does this reduce what the federal government spends?
By eliminating tax exclusions on home sale gains, the bill reduces potential federal tax revenue.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
- Elimination of dollar limits on home sale gains: Under Section 1, the bill would remove the current restrictions on how much profit can be excluded from taxes when a person sells their principal residence. This could benefit homeowners by allowing them to keep more of the gain from their home sales without hitting a specific dollar cap.
Potential Negative Impacts for People
- No negative impacts identified: The provided text does not contain information regarding potential negative consequences or burdens resulting from this bill.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Tap or hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Would people with substantial wealth be better off under this? — This bill disproportionately benefits those with significant equity in high-value residential properties. Would high-income households be better off under this? — Higher income households with more expensive principal residences benefit most from removing the cap on gain exclusions. Would people over 65 be better off under this? — Seniors often sell high-value principal residences and would benefit from the removal of gain exclusion caps. Would middle-income households be better off under this? — The bill allows middle-class homeowners to exclude more profit from the sale of their homes from taxation.
- Economy And Finance
- Does this cut taxes for middle-income families? — The bill removes dollar limits on the exclusion of gains from the sale of principal residences, which benefits homeowners. Does this cut taxes for small businesses? — Homeowners who operate small businesses from their primary residence may benefit from higher gain exclusions. Does this reduce what the federal government spends? — By eliminating tax exclusions on home sale gains, the bill reduces potential federal tax revenue.
- Social Issues And Justice
- Does this make housing cost less? — Increasing the ability to retain home sale profits may improve liquidity for homeowners looking to relocate.
- 3/25/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 2/17/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 2/10/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 1/27/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 1/21/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 1/20/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 1/13/2026
- Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
- Introduced in House
2 bills Congress.gov lists as related to this one — companions in the other chamber, earlier versions, and bills this one absorbed or was folded into.
Andy BiggsRepublican · Arizona
Gabe EvansRepublican · Colorado
Mike HaridopolosRepublican · Florida
Jeff HurdRepublican · Colorado
Ronny JacksonRepublican · Texas
Roger WilliamsRepublican · Texas