A Republican bill with 64 Democratic cosponsors · See all 76 cosponsors
Last activity — Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
In committee
Introduced and handed to a committee in the chamber it started in.
The committee holds it, and most bills are never heard from again. A hearing or a committee vote would be news; silence is the usual outcome, and it kills the bill without anyone voting against it.
Its path through Congress
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
This bill aims to advance research, treatments, and awareness for brain tumors and other rare cancers. It requires reporting on brain tumor biospecimen collections to make them more transparent for researchers. The legislation establishes specific research networks and team science awards focused on glioblastoma and cellular immunotherapy. It sets up a national public awareness campaign and demonstration projects regarding cancer clinical trials and biomarker testing. Additionally, the bill authorizes pilot programs for monitoring and caring for brain tumor survivors across their lifespans. Finally, it directs the Food and Drug Administration to issue guidance ensuring patient access to clinical trials.
Yes· 3 of 29
- Scored +10
Does this put more money into scientific research?
Provides substantial funding for brain tumor research, CAR-T treatments, and biospecimen transparency.
- Scored +9
Does this put more money into medical research?
Authorizes significant funding for glioblastoma research and cellular immunotherapy.
- Scored +8
Would children be better off under this?
Specifically addresses pediatric brain tumors and provides funding for pediatric cellular immunotherapy.
The opposite
- Scored -2
Does this reduce what the federal government spends?
The bill increases government spending by authorizing new grants and programs.
- Scored -1
Does this reduce what the federal government owes?
The bill authorizes new federal spending totaling millions of dollars over several years.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Section 3 helps researchers find and access brain tumor biospecimens by creating a searchable website for collections funded by the National Institutes of Health, which could speed up research discoveries.
-
Section 4 establishes the Glioblastoma Therapeutics Network and brain tumor cellular immunotherapy awards, dedicating funding to improve treatments and clinical trials for adult and pediatric brain tumor patients.
-
Section 5 creates a national public awareness campaign and demonstration grants to educate patients, families, and health providers about cancer clinical trials and biomarker testing, particularly targeting high-risk and rural populations.
-
Section 6 funds pilot programs at medical schools, children's hospitals, and cancer centers to study and improve long-term monitoring, follow-up care, and mental health support for brain tumor survivors and their families.
-
Section 7 requires the Food and Drug Administration to issue guidance that helps minimize the exclusion of brain tumor and rare cancer patients from clinical trials evaluating other treatments.
Potential Negative Impacts for People
- Section 3 enforces reporting requirements on individuals and entities that maintain covered biospecimen collections, and penalizes repeated or egregious violations by withholding federal funding, which could create administrative burdens or disruptions for research organizations.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Tap or hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Would children be better off under this? — Specifically addresses pediatric brain tumors and provides funding for pediatric cellular immunotherapy. Would people in their twenties and thirties be better off under this? — Specifically addresses pediatric and young adult brain tumor mortality. Would people in middle age be better off under this? — Increases research and treatment options for adult brain tumor patients. Would people over 65 be better off under this? — Increases research and treatment options for adult brain tumor patients. Would people in rural areas be better off under this? — Explicitly targets rural communities for cancer awareness and outreach campaigns. Would high-income households be better off under this? — Improves overall medical outcomes for brain tumor patients. Would households on low incomes be better off under this? — Targeted outreach for higher-risk populations and improved access to clinical trials benefits those with fewer resources. Would middle-income households be better off under this? — Improves overall medical outcomes for brain tumor patients. Would people with disabilities be better off under this? — Focuses on survivor care, including multidisciplinary care and psychosocial support. Would retired people be better off under this? — Improves overall medical research and survival rates for adult brain tumor patients. Would Black Americans be better off under this? — Ensures culturally competent outreach and targets populations at higher risk of cancer. Would Asian Americans be better off under this? — Ensures culturally competent outreach and targets populations at higher risk of cancer. Would Hispanic Americans be better off under this? — Ensures culturally competent outreach and targets populations at higher risk of cancer. Would men be better off under this? — Improves general medical research and treatment for brain tumors. Would Native Americans be better off under this? — Ensures culturally competent outreach and targets populations at higher risk of cancer. Would people in cities be better off under this? — Increases access to clinical trials and specialized care centers. Would white Americans be better off under this? — Improves general medical research and treatment for brain tumors. Would women be better off under this? — Improves general medical research and treatment for brain tumors. Would immigrants be better off under this? — Requires linguistically competent outreach materials.
- Healthcare
- Does this put more money into medical research? — Authorizes significant funding for glioblastoma research and cellular immunotherapy. Does this make health care easier to get in general? — Increases access to clinical trials, biomarker testing awareness, and specialized survivor care. Does this make mental health care easier to get? — Pilot programs explicitly include developing and evaluating psychosocial evaluations and counseling for survivors.
- Education And Technology
- Does this put more money into scientific research? — Provides substantial funding for brain tumor research, CAR-T treatments, and biospecimen transparency.
- Governance And Ideology
- Does this make what the government does easier for the public to see? — Creates a public website to track NIH-funded biospecimen collections. Does this give the federal government more power? — Increases federal oversight of biospecimen collections and NIH grant administration.
- Environment Energy And Infrastructure
- Does this invest in rural communities? — Specifically targets rural communities for cancer clinical trial and biomarker testing outreach.
- Social Issues And Justice
- Does this narrow racial gaps in how people are treated? — Requires national campaigns to be culturally competent and target populations at higher risk based on race and ethnicity.
- Economy And Finance
- Is this likely to create jobs? — Funding for new research networks and team science awards may create specialized research and clinical positions. Is this likely to grow the economy? — Investment in medical innovation and biotechnology research generally supports long-term economic growth. Does this reduce what the federal government spends? — The bill increases government spending by authorizing new grants and programs. Does this reduce what the federal government owes? — The bill authorizes new federal spending totaling millions of dollars over several years.
- 10/13/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 9/28/2026
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 9/24/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 9/21/2026
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 9/16/2026
- 3 Cosponsors added.
- 9/15/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 9/14/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 7/30/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 7/20/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 7/9/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 6/23/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 6/10/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 6/9/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 6/2/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 5/29/2026
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 5/26/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 5/20/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 5/15/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 5/13/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 5/11/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 5/7/2026
- 3 Cosponsors added.
- 4/27/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 3/17/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 3/16/2026
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 3/5/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 12/18/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 12/9/2025
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 11/12/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 11/7/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 11/4/2025
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 10/31/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 10/14/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 9/30/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 9/15/2025
- 4 Cosponsors added.
- 9/11/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 9/10/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 9/9/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 8/22/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 8/8/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 8/5/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 7/2/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 6/9/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 6/3/2025
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 6/2/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 5/21/2025
- 4 Cosponsors added.
- 5/19/2025
- 3 Cosponsors added.
- 5/13/2025
- 3 Cosponsors added.
- 5/7/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 5/6/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 4/30/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 4/24/2025
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 4/9/2025
- Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
- 3 Cosponsors added.
- Introduced in House
One bill Congress.gov lists as related to this one — companions in the other chamber, earlier versions, and bills this one absorbed or was folded into.
Jake AuchinclossDemocrat · Massachusetts
Gabe AmoDemocrat · Rhode Island
Julia BrownleyDemocrat · California
Don BaconRepublican · Nebraska
Nikki BudzinskiDemocrat · Illinois
Janelle BynumDemocrat · Oregon
Robert BresnahanRepublican · Pennsylvania
Kathy CastorDemocrat · Florida
Yvette ClarkeDemocrat · New York
Salud CarbajalDemocrat · California
Jason CrowDemocrat · Colorado
Herbert ConawayDemocrat · New Jersey
Scott DesJarlaisRepublican · Tennessee
Suzan DelBeneDemocrat · Washington
Debbie DingellDemocrat · Michigan
Sharice DavidsDemocrat · Kansas
Madeleine DeanDemocrat · Pennsylvania
Sarah ElfrethDemocrat · Maryland
Scott FranklinRepublican · Florida
Josh GottheimerDemocrat · New Jersey
Lance GoodenRepublican · Texas
Daniel GoldmanDemocrat · New York
Laura GillenDemocrat · New York
Adelita GrijalvaDemocrat · Arizona
Henry JohnsonDemocrat · Georgia
John JoyceRepublican · Pennsylvania
Jonathan JacksonDemocrat · Illinois
Julie JohnsonDemocrat · Texas
William KeatingDemocrat · Massachusetts
Young KimRepublican · California
Thomas KeanRepublican · New Jersey
Timothy KennedyDemocrat · New York
Kimberlyn King-HindsRepublican · Northern Mariana Islands
Stephen LynchDemocrat · Massachusetts
Ted LieuDemocrat · California
Mike LevinDemocrat · California
Michael LawlerRepublican · New York
Summer LeeDemocrat · Pennsylvania
George LatimerDemocrat · New York
James McGovernDemocrat · Massachusetts
Kweisi MfumeDemocrat · Maryland
Betty McCollumDemocrat · Minnesota
Seth MoultonDemocrat · Massachusetts
Lucy McBathDemocrat · Georgia
Seth MagazinerDemocrat · Rhode Island
Kevin MullinDemocrat · California
Ryan MackenzieRepublican · Pennsylvania
Sarah McBrideDemocrat · Delaware
Eleanor NortonDemocrat · District of Columbia
Donald NorcrossDemocrat · New Jersey
Joe NeguseDemocrat · Colorado
Chellie PingreeDemocrat · Maine
Mark PocanDemocrat · Wisconsin
Scott PetersDemocrat · California
Brittany PettersenDemocrat · Colorado
Deborah RossDemocrat · North Carolina
Patrick RyanDemocrat · New York
Raul RuizDemocrat · California
Jamie RaskinDemocrat · Maryland
Emily RandallDemocrat · Washington
Josh RileyDemocrat · New York
Adam SmithDemocrat · Washington
Darren SotoDemocrat · Florida
Haley StevensDemocrat · Michigan
Kim SchrierDemocrat · Washington
Eric SorensenDemocrat · Illinois
Mike ThompsonDemocrat · California
Paul TonkoDemocrat · New York
Rashida TlaibDemocrat · Michigan
Lori TrahanDemocrat · Massachusetts
Ritchie TorresDemocrat · New York
Derrick Van OrdenRepublican · Wisconsin
Eugene VindmanDemocrat · Virginia
Nikema WilliamsDemocrat · Georgia
Debbie Wasserman SchultzDemocrat · Florida
James WalkinshawDemocrat · Virginia