Chuck Grassley (R-IA)
A resolution supporting the observation of National Trafficking and Modern Slavery Prevention Month during the period beginning on January 1, 2025, and ending on February 1, 2025, to raise awareness of, and opposition to, human trafficking and modern slavery.
A Republican resolution with 5 Democratic cosponsors · See all 8 cosponsors
Last activity — Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S387-388; text: CR S397-398)
Adopted
The chamber formally agreed to it, and for a resolution that is the finish line: what it says is now officially the chamber's position, rule or tribute.
Nothing more is needed. A resolution is how a chamber speaks for itself or sets its own rules, so adopting it is what puts it into effect. It is not a law, so there is nothing for the President to sign.
Its path through Congress
- Introduced
- Officially Recorded
- Adopted by the Senate unanimous consent
A Senate resolution is the Senate speaking for itself: stating a position, honouring someone, or setting its own rules. Adopting it is the whole process. Once the Senate agrees to it, it is officially the Senate's word; it is not a law, so the House and the President have no part in it.
The Senate by unanimous consent (no one objected, so there was no vote): no senator's position on it was recorded.
What this bill would do
This resolution supports the observation of National Trafficking and Modern Slavery Prevention Month from January 1, 2025, to February 1, 2025. The purpose is to raise awareness and opposition to human trafficking and modern slavery. It encourages marking this month with appropriate programs and activities. The observation culminates on February 1, 2025, with National Freedom Day. Finally, it urges continued partnerships between various government agencies, survivors, and nonprofit organizations to address these issues.
Yes· 3 of 9
- Scored +5
Would children be better off under this?
The resolution focuses on raising awareness to protect children and youths who are prime targets for trafficking and sex trafficking.
- Scored +5
Would Native Americans be better off under this?
The resolution highlights and seeks to address the specific risks and data gaps regarding the trafficking of American Indian and Alaska Native populations.
- Scored +5
Does this narrow racial gaps in how people are treated?
The resolution specifically addresses the heightened risk and lack of research regarding the trafficking of Native American, Alaska Native, and Pacific Islander women and girls.
The opposite
No question was scored the opposite.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Raising Awareness and Opposition: The resolution supports observing a specific month to raise awareness of and opposition to human trafficking and modern slavery (Resolution Section 1). This can help the public recognize the realities of these crimes.
-
Collaborative Approaches to Victims: The resolution urges partnerships between Federal, State, Tribal, and local agencies, as well as survivors and social service providers (Resolution Section 3). This promotes a collaborative, victim-centered approach to addressing human trafficking.
-
Recognition of Vital Public Role: The observation recognizes the vital role that the people of the United States have in ending human trafficking and modern slavery (Resolution Section 1).
Potential Negative Impacts for People
- No negative impacts are explicitly stated in the text provided.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Tap or hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Would children be better off under this? — The resolution focuses on raising awareness to protect children and youths who are prime targets for trafficking and sex trafficking. Would Native Americans be better off under this? — The resolution highlights and seeks to address the specific risks and data gaps regarding the trafficking of American Indian and Alaska Native populations. Would LGBTQ people be better off under this? — The resolution notes that LGBTQ youth are at a higher risk of sex trafficking, necessitating targeted awareness and prevention. Would women be better off under this? — The resolution emphasizes the heightened risk of sex trafficking for women and girls, particularly within Native American communities. Would households on low incomes be better off under this? — The resolution addresses the protection of vulnerable populations, including those experiencing homelessness, who are at higher risk for trafficking.
- Social Issues And Justice
- Does this narrow racial gaps in how people are treated? — The resolution specifically addresses the heightened risk and lack of research regarding the trafficking of Native American, Alaska Native, and Pacific Islander women and girls. Does this change how police departments operate? — The resolution urges a unified and coordinated response among Federal, State, Tribal, and local agencies to identify and prosecute traffickers. Is this likely to lift people out of poverty? — By raising awareness of human trafficking, the resolution targets a major driver of vulnerability among homeless and marginalized youths. Is this likely to reduce homelessness? — The resolution highlights the specific vulnerability of homeless youth to sex and labor trafficking.
- 1/27/2025
- Passed/agreed to in Senate: Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent.
- Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S387-388; text: CR S397-398)
- 8 Cosponsors added.
- Introduced in Senate
One bill Congress.gov lists as related to this one — companions in the other chamber, earlier versions, and bills this one absorbed or was folded into.
Richard BlumenthalDemocrat · Connecticut
Susan CollinsRepublican · Maine
Shelley CapitoRepublican · West Virginia
Catherine Cortez MastoDemocrat · Nevada
Richard DurbinDemocrat · Illinois
Amy KlobucharDemocrat · Minnesota
Lisa MurkowskiRepublican · Alaska
Ron WydenDemocrat · Oregon