Chuck Grassley (R-IA)
A resolution supporting the observation of National Trafficking and Modern Slavery Prevention Month during the period beginning on January 1, 2026, and ending on February 1, 2026, to raise awareness of, and opposition to, human trafficking and modern slavery.
A Republican resolution with 4 Democratic cosponsors · See all 6 cosponsors
Last activity — Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S557; text: CR S555-556)
Adopted
The chamber formally agreed to it, and for a resolution that is the finish line: what it says is now officially the chamber's position, rule or tribute.
Nothing more is needed. A resolution is how a chamber speaks for itself or sets its own rules, so adopting it is what puts it into effect. It is not a law, so there is nothing for the President to sign.
Its path through Congress
- Introduced
- Officially Recorded
- Adopted by the Senate unanimous consent
A Senate resolution is the Senate speaking for itself: stating a position, honouring someone, or setting its own rules. Adopting it is the whole process. Once the Senate agrees to it, it is officially the Senate's word; it is not a law, so the House and the President have no part in it.
The Senate by unanimous consent (no one objected, so there was no vote): no senator's position on it was recorded.
What this bill would do
This resolution supports the observation of National Trafficking and Modern Slavery Prevention Month from January 1, 2026, to February 1, 2026. The goal is to raise awareness and opposition to human trafficking and modern slavery. It encourages the use of programs and activities to mark this month, ending with National Freedom Day on February 1. The resolution also urges continued partnerships between various government agencies, survivors, and nonprofit organizations. These efforts aim to address human trafficking through a collaborative, victim-centered approach.
Yes· 3 of 10
- Scored +5
Would children be better off under this?
The resolution focuses on protecting children and youths who are particularly vulnerable to human trafficking and sexual exploitation.
- Scored +5
Would Native Americans be better off under this?
The resolution specifically notes the high risks and barriers faced by American Indian and Alaska Native victims of trafficking.
- Scored +5
Does this narrow racial gaps in how people are treated?
The resolution highlights the specific risks faced by Native American, Alaska Native, and Pacific Islander women and girls regarding sex trafficking.
The opposite
No question was scored the opposite.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Increased Public Awareness: The resolution seeks to increase awareness of the realities of human trafficking and modern slavery to help people recognize and oppose these crimes (Resolution, Section 1).
-
Collaborative Support for Victims: By urging partnerships between Federal, State, Tribal, and local agencies alongside social service providers and survivors, the resolution promotes a collaborative, victim-sited approach to addressing trafficking (Resolution, Section 3).
-
Recognition of National Freedom Day: The observation culminates in the celebration of National Freedom Day on February 1, 2026 (Resolution, Section 2).
Potential Negative Impacts for People
- No specific negative impacts or burdens are identified within the text of this resolution.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Tap or hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Would children be better off under this? — The resolution focuses on protecting children and youths who are particularly vulnerable to human trafficking and sexual exploitation. Would Native Americans be better off under this? — The resolution specifically notes the high risks and barriers faced by American Indian and Alaska Native victims of trafficking. Would LGBTQ people be better off under this? — The resolution identifies that LGBTQ youth are at a higher risk of becoming sex trafficking victims. Would women be better off under this? — The resolution highlights the heightened risk of sex trafficking for Native women and girls. Would households on low incomes be better off under this? — The resolution addresses the heightened risks faced by homeless youths, who often fall into low-income categories.
- Social Issues And Justice
- Does this narrow racial gaps in how people are treated? — The resolution highlights the specific risks faced by Native American, Alaska Native, and Pacific Islander women and girls regarding sex trafficking. Does this change how police departments operate? — The resolution calls for a unified and coordinated response among all levels of government agencies to identify and prosecute traffickers. Is this likely to lift people out of poverty? — The resolution addresses the vulnerability of homeless youths who are at a high risk of being targeted for trafficking. Is this likely to reduce homelessness? — The resolution identifies the link between youth homelessness and trafficking risks to encourage prevention efforts.
- Governance And Ideology
- Does this make what the government does easier for the public to see? — The resolution promotes awareness and coordination among various government agencies to combat human trafficking.
- 2/10/2026
- Passed/agreed to in Senate: Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent.
- Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S557; text: CR S555-556)
- 6 Cosponsors added.
- Bill introduced.
One bill Congress.gov lists as related to this one — companions in the other chamber, earlier versions, and bills this one absorbed or was folded into.
Richard BlumenthalDemocrat · Connecticut
Susan CollinsRepublican · Maine
Catherine Cortez MastoDemocrat · Nevada
Richard DurbinDemocrat · Illinois
Jon HustedRepublican · Ohio
Ron WydenDemocrat · Oregon