A Republican bill with 5 Democratic cosponsors · See all 11 cosponsors
Last activity — Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
In committee
Introduced and handed to a committee in the chamber it started in.
The committee holds it, and most bills are never heard from again. A hearing or a committee vote would be news; silence is the usual outcome, and it kills the bill without anyone voting against it.
Its path through Congress
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
This bill, known as the "Credit for Caring Act of 2025," seeks to amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986. It proposes a new tax credit specifically for working family caregivers. The credit is designed to offset qualified expenses paid for the care of a qualified care recipient. Eligible caregivers can claim a credit equal to 30 percent of their qualified expenses that exceed $2,000. This credit is subject to a maximum limit of $5,000 per year.
Yes· 3 of 13
- Scored +5
Would people over 65 be better off under this?
The bill provides support for those with long-term care needs.
- Scored +5
Would middle-income households be better off under this?
The credit is specifically targeted at working caregivers with moderate incomes.
- Scored +5
Would people with disabilities be better off under this?
The bill provides financial support for those requiring assistance with activities of daily living.
The opposite
No question was scored the opposite.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Financial Relief for Caregivers: Eligible caregivers can receive a tax credit of 30% of qualified expenses exceeding $2,000, up to a maximum of $5,000 (Section 2(a) and 2(b)).
-
Support for Diverse Care Needs: The bill covers a wide range of costs, including human assistance, assistive technologies, environmental modifications, and even travel or lost wages related to caregiving (Section s 2(e)(1) and 2(e)(4)).
-
Inflation Protection: The maximum credit amount and the income thresholds are subject to adjustments for inflation to maintain their value in future years (Section 2(b) and 2(f)).
-
Broad Definition of Care Recipients: The credit can benefit those caring for spouses, relatives, or individuals with specific long-term care needs, such as those requiring help with daily living activities (Section 2(d)).
Potential Negative Impacts for People
-
Income Restrictions: The credit is reduced as a taxpayer's modified adjusted gross income rises above certain thresholds, such as $150,000 for joint returns or $75,000 for others (Section 2(f)).
-
Strict Eligibility Requirements: To be considered an "eligible caregiver," an individual must have earned income in excess of $7,500 for the taxable year (Section 2(c)).
-
Certification Burdens: Care recipients must be certified by a licensed health care practitioner, and taxpayers must provide specific identification numbers for both the recipient and the practitioner on their tax returns (Section 2(d) and 2(g)).
-
Expense Documentation: Caregivers must substantiate their qualified expenses according to regulations provided by the Secretary (Section 2(e)(6)).
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Tap or hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Would middle-income households be better off under this? — The credit is specifically targeted at working caregivers with moderate incomes. Would people with disabilities be better off under this? — The bill provides financial support for those requiring assistance with activities of daily living. Would people over 65 be better off under this? — The bill provides support for those with long-term care needs. Would children be better off under this? — The credit covers expenses for children with specific health needs. Would households on low incomes be better off under this? — The credit provides significant relief for those meeting the income and earned income requirements. Would people in middle age be better off under this? — This group is often in the 'sandwich generation' providing care for both children and elders. Would retired people be better off under this? — The credit can benefit those receiving care from family members. Would women be better off under this? — Caregiving responsibilities disproportionately fall on women, making this a beneficial policy.
- Social Issues And Justice
- Does this make child care cost less? — The bill covers qualified expenses for children under certain age and health criteria. Does this expand the rights of people with disabilities? — The credit assists in the care of individuals with long-term functional or cognitive needs. Is this likely to lift people out of poverty? — The credit provides financial relief to working-class families managing care costs.
- Economy And Finance
- Does this cut taxes for middle-income families? — The bill provides a significant tax credit for working families to offset caregiving expenses.
- Healthcare
- Does this make health care easier to get in general? — The bill provides financial support for various care services and assistive technologies.
- 6/15/2026
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 4/30/2026
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 6/26/2025
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 5/8/2025
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 4/9/2025
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 3/11/2025
- Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- Introduced in Senate
3 bills Congress.gov lists as related to this one — companions in the other chamber, earlier versions, and bills this one absorbed or was folded into.
Tammy BaldwinDemocrat · Wisconsin
Michael BennetDemocrat · Colorado
Susan CollinsRepublican · Maine
James JusticeRepublican · West Virginia
Amy KlobucharDemocrat · Minnesota
Angus KingIndependent · Maine
Lisa MurkowskiRepublican · Alaska
Mike RoundsRepublican · South Dakota
Dan SullivanRepublican · Alaska
Chris Van HollenDemocrat · Maryland
Raphael WarnockDemocrat · Georgia