Cynthia Lummis (R-WY)
Farmers and Ranchers Relief Act of 2026
A Republican bill with 4 Republican cosponsors · See all 4 cosponsors
Last activity — Read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works.
In committee
Introduced and handed to a committee in the chamber it started in.
The committee holds it, and most bills are never heard from again. A hearing or a committee vote would be news; silence is the usual outcome, and it kills the bill without anyone voting against it.
Its path through Congress
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
The "Farmers and Ranchers Relief Act of 2026" seeks to change how the Federal Water Pollution Control Act is applied. It aims to provide permitting relief to landowners. The bill directs that exemptions for certain discharges of dredged or fill material be interpreted liberally. Additionally, it specifies that recapture provisions should be interpreted narrowly.
Yes· 3 of 7
- Scored +9
Would farmers be better off under this?
The bill is specifically named for and intended to provide permitting relief to farmers and ranchers.
- Scored +8
Would people in rural areas be better off under this?
Highly beneficial for rural landowners who deal with the Federal Water Pollution Control Act.
- Scored +6
Would business owners be better off under this?
Directly benefits landowners and agricultural business owners by reducing regulatory costs.
The opposite
- Scored -5
Does this better protect air, water and wildlife?
The bill directs liberal interpretation of exemptions for discharging material into waters, potentially reducing environmental oversight.
- Scored -4
Does this give the federal government more power?
Limits the federal government's ability to strictly enforce permitting for water discharges.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
- Permitting Relief for Landowners: The bill intends to provide "meaningful permitting relief to landowners" by ensuring exemptions for certain discharges of dredged or fill material are interpreted liberally (Section 2).
Potential Negative Impacts for People
- No negative impacts for people are explicitly mentioned in the provided text.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Tap or hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Would farmers be better off under this? — The bill is specifically named for and intended to provide permitting relief to farmers and ranchers. Would people in rural areas be better off under this? — Highly beneficial for rural landowners who deal with the Federal Water Pollution Control Act. Would business owners be better off under this? — Directly benefits landowners and agricultural business owners by reducing regulatory costs.
- Economy And Finance
- Does this make it easier to run a small business? — Provides regulatory relief to small-scale landowners and farming operations by easing permitting requirements. Is this likely to grow the economy? — Reducing regulatory burdens on landowners can stimulate agricultural productivity and land development.
- Governance And Ideology
- Does this leave more decisions to the states? — By reducing federal permitting oversight, it effectively gives more control back to local landowners and state jurisdictions. Does this give the federal government more power? — Limits the federal government's ability to strictly enforce permitting for water discharges.
- Environment Energy And Infrastructure
- Does this invest in rural communities? — Eases regulatory hurdles for rural landowners, specifically farmers and ranchers, to manage their land. Does this better protect air, water and wildlife? — The bill directs liberal interpretation of exemptions for discharging material into waters, potentially reducing environmental oversight.
- 8/4/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 7/13/2026
- Read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works.
- 3 Cosponsors added.
- Introduced in Senate
- Alan Armstrong
Republican · Oklahoma
Mike LeeRepublican · Utah
David McCormickRepublican · Pennsylvania
Pete RickettsRepublican · Nebraska