A Republican bill with 3 Democratic cosponsors · See all 6 cosponsors
Last activity — Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
In committee
Introduced and handed to a committee in the chamber it started in.
The committee holds it, and most bills are never heard from again. A hearing or a committee vote would be news; silence is the usual outcome, and it kills the bill without anyone voting against it.
Its path through Congress
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
This bill, known as the "TRUST Act of 2026," proposes changes to the Federal Deposit Insurance Act. It aims to modify the thresholds used for banking examinations. Specifically, it would allow Federal banking agencies to examine certain insured depository institutions with up to $6,000,000,000 in total assets at least once every 18 months. This is an increase from the previous $3,000,000,000 threshold.
Yes
- Scored +1
Is this likely to create jobs?
Reducing the frequency of federal banking examinations may reduce regulatory overhead for mid-sized banks.
- Scored +1
Does this make it easier to run a small business?
By increasing the asset threshold for regular examinations, the bill reduces the regulatory burden on banks with assets up to $6 billion.
- Scored +1
Would business owners be better off under this?
The bill benefits owners of banks with assets between $3 billion and $6 billion by allowing less frequent mandatory federal examinations.
The opposite
- Scored -1
Does this make what the government does easier for the public to see?
Extending the time between federal banking examinations may reduce the frequency of government oversight and reporting.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
- Changes to Examination Thresholds: By increasing the asset threshold from $3,000,000,000 to $6,000,000,000 in Section 10(d), the bill permits Federal banking agencies to examine qualifying institutions with more assets on a specific schedule. This is found in Section 2.
Potential Negative Impacts for People
- No negative impacts are explicitly stated in the provided text.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Tap or hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Economy And Finance
- Does this make it easier to run a small business? — By increasing the asset threshold for regular examinations, the bill reduces the regulatory burden on banks with assets up to $6 billion. Is this likely to create jobs? — Reducing the frequency of federal banking examinations may reduce regulatory overhead for mid-sized banks.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Would business owners be better off under this? — The bill benefits owners of banks with assets between $3 billion and $6 billion by allowing less frequent mandatory federal examinations.
- Governance And Ideology
- Does this make what the government does easier for the public to see? — Extending the time between federal banking examinations may reduce the frequency of government oversight and reporting.
- 8/4/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 3/25/2026
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 2/11/2026
- Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
- 3 Cosponsors added.
- Introduced in Senate
2 bills Congress.gov lists as related to this one — companions in the other chamber, earlier versions, and bills this one absorbed or was folded into.
Angela AlsobrooksDemocrat · Maryland
John KennedyRepublican · Louisiana
Andy KimDemocrat · New Jersey
David McCormickRepublican · Pennsylvania
Pete RickettsRepublican · Nebraska
Raphael WarnockDemocrat · Georgia