Brian Schatz (D-HI)
Kids Off Social Media Act
A Democratic bill with 6 Republican cosponsors · See all 14 cosponsors
Last activity — Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 108.
Cleared committee, waiting for its first floor vote
A committee approved it and it is on the calendar of the chamber it started in.
This is further than most bills get, and still no promise of a vote: the calendar is a queue, and the majority leadership decides what is called. A bill can sit here until the Congress ends.
Its path through Congress
- Introduced
- On Calendar
What this bill would do
This bill, known as the "Kids Off Social Media Act," aims to restrict social media access for young users. It prohibits social media platforms from allowing children under age 13 to create or maintain accounts. Additionally, it forbids platforms from using personalized recommendation systems on users under age 17, with limited exceptions. The bill also includes the "Eyes on the Board Act of 2025," which updates the Children's Internet Protection Act to include social media platforms. This update requires schools to implement policies and technology to prevent students from accessing social media on school networks and devices.
Yes· 3 of 6
- Scored +8
Would children be better off under this?
The bill prohibits social media access for those under 13 and limits algorithmic profiling for those under 17.
- Scored +7
Does this give people more control over their personal data?
The bill requires platforms to delete personal data of children under 13 and restricts data-driven recommendations for teens.
- Scored +6
Does this give people more protection from unfair business practices?
The bill protects minors from data-driven algorithmic manipulation on social media platforms.
The opposite
- Scored -3
Does this put more money into public schools?
The bill requires schools to implement new technology and monitoring measures that may divert funds from other educational needs.
- Scored -1
Would households on low incomes be better off under this?
Schools may face financial burdens that could impact low-income district resources.
- Scored -1
Does this make child care cost less?
The bill imposes new compliance and technology costs on schools which may affect educational resources.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Protection of Children Under 13: Social media platforms are prohibited from allowing individuals under 13 to maintain accounts, which includes a requirement to delete their personal data (Section 103).
-
Limiting Algorithmic Influence on Teens: Platforms cannot use personalized recommendation systems—which use personal data to suggest content—on users between the ages of 13 and 17 (Section 104).
-
Enhanced School Safety and Focus: Schools are required to implement technology protection measures to block access to social media on school-supported services, devices, and networks (Section 202.A.2.B.i.I).
-
Increased Transparency for Schools: The Commission is required to establish a public database containing the internet safety policies submitted by schools (Section 203.1.A.i.G).
Potential Negative Impacts for People
-
Data Deletion Requirements: When an account is terminated because a user is a child, the platform must immediately delete all personal data, though users can request a copy of that data within 90 days (Section 103.c).
-
Restrictions on Content Delivery: While the bill allows for chronological feeds, it prevents the use of personalized systems to promote or rank content for teens, which may affect how they discover new content (Section 104.a).
-
Financial Burden and Risks for Schools: Schools that fail to comply with the new certification and technology requirements may become ineligible for certain services or be required to reimburse funds (Section 202.A.2.C.ii).
-
Increased Monitoring for Students: Schools must monitor online activities on their services and networks to ensure students are not accessing social media platforms (Section 202.A.2.B.i.I.aa).
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Tap or hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Would children be better off under this? — The bill prohibits social media access for those under 13 and limits algorithmic profiling for those under 17. Would students be better off under this? — The bill aims to create a safer internet environment for students by limiting social media access in schools. Would people in their twenties and thirties be better off under this? — The bill limits personalized recommendation systems for individuals under age 17. Would households on low incomes be better off under this? — Schools may face financial burdens that could impact low-income district resources.
- Economy And Finance
- Does this give people more protection from unfair business practices? — The bill protects minors from data-driven algorithmic manipulation on social media platforms.
- Education And Technology
- Does this give people more control over their personal data? — The bill requires platforms to delete personal data of children under 13 and restricts data-driven recommendations for teens. Does this put more money into public schools? — The bill requires schools to implement new technology and monitoring measures that may divert funds from other educational needs.
- Governance And Ideology
- Does this make what the government does easier for the public to see? — The bill requires the Commission to establish a public database of school internet safety policies.
- Social Issues And Justice
- Does this make child care cost less? — The bill imposes new compliance and technology costs on schools which may affect educational resources.
- 2/9/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 7/23/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 6/30/2025
- Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation. Reported by Senator Cruz without amendment. With written report No. 119-33.
- Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 108.
- 6/25/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 6/9/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 6/3/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 2/5/2025
- Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation. Ordered to be reported without amendment favorably.
- 1/28/2025
- Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
- 9 Cosponsors added.
- Introduced in Senate
2 bills Congress.gov lists as related to this one — companions in the other chamber, earlier versions, and bills this one absorbed or was folded into.
Angela AlsobrooksDemocrat · Maryland
Ted BuddRepublican · North Carolina
Katie BrittRepublican · Alabama
Ted CruzRepublican · Texas
John CurtisRepublican · Utah
John FettermanDemocrat · Pennsylvania
Lindsey GrahamRepublican · South Carolina
Mark KellyDemocrat · Arizona
Angus KingIndependent · Maine
Christopher MurphyDemocrat · Connecticut
David McCormickRepublican · Pennsylvania
Elissa SlotkinDemocrat · Michigan
Peter WelchDemocrat · Vermont
Mark WarnerDemocrat · Virginia