Tammy Duckworth (D-IL)

ESP, Paraprofessional, and Education Support Staff Family Leave Act

S. 2738 · Senate bill Labor and Employment

A Democratic bill with 9 Democratic cosponsors · See all 9 cosponsors

Last activity — Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.

In committee

Introduced and handed to a committee in the chamber it started in.

The committee holds it, and most bills are never heard from again. A hearing or a committee vote would be news; silence is the usual outcome, and it kills the bill without anyone voting against it.

Its path through Congress

  1. Introduced
  2. In Committee

What this bill would do

This bill, titled the "ESP, Paraprofessional, and Education Support Staff Family Leave Act," seeks to change eligibility requirements under the Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993. It specifically targets paraprofessionals and education support staff employed by educational agencies or institutions. The legislation proposes a new way to determine if these employees meet the necessary hours of service requirement. Under this proposal, employees would meet the requirement if they worked at least 60 percent of the total monthly hours expected for their specific job duties during the previous school year. Additionally, the bill directs the Secretary to provide methods for calculating leave for these covered educational employees.

Yes· 3 of 6

  • Scored +3

    Would union members be better off under this?

    The bill strengthens labor rights by providing more predictable ways for support staff to qualify for family and medical leave.

  • Scored +3

    Does this strengthen the rights of workers to organise?

    The bill expands eligibility for job-protected leave for paraprofessionals and education support staff.

  • Scored +2

    Would households on low incomes be better off under this?

    The bill expands job-protected leave access for employees in clerical, custodial, and food service roles which are often low-income positions.

The opposite

No question was scored the opposite.