CONGRESS FOR VOTERS

Sean Casten (D-IL)

ESP, Paraprofessional, and Education Support Staff Family Leave Act

H.R. 5222 · House bill Labor and Employment

A Democratic bill with 1 Republican cosponsor · See all 74 cosponsors

Last activity — Referred to the Committee on Education and Workforce, and in addition to the Committees on Oversight and Government Reform, and House Administration, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.

In committee

Introduced and handed to a committee in the chamber it started in.

The committee holds it, and most bills are never heard from again. A hearing or a committee vote would be news; silence is the usual outcome, and it kills the bill without anyone voting against it.

Its path through Congress

  1. Introduced
  2. In Committee

What this bill would do

This bill, titled the "ESP, Paraprofessional, and Education Support Staff Family Leave Act," aims to change eligibility requirements under the Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993. It specifically focuses on paraprofessionals and education support staff employed by educational agencies or institutions. The bill establishes a specific method for these employees to meet the required hours of service. It defines these roles to include various service types such as clerical, transportation, and food services. Additionally, it directs the Secretary to provide methods for calculating leave for these specific employees.

Yes· 3 of 8

  • Scored +5

    Would households on low incomes be better off under this?

    The bill expands FMLA eligibility for educational support staff who are often in lower-income service roles.

  • Scored +5

    Would union members be better off under this?

    The bill enhances labor protections and leave benefits for educational support staff and paraprofessionals.

  • Scored +4

    Would people with disabilities be better off under this?

    Expanded FMLA eligibility provides better job protection for employees who may need leave for medical conditions.

The opposite

No question was scored the opposite.