Michael Turner (R-OH)
To amend the Dayton Aviation Heritage Preservation Act of 1992 to adjust the boundary of the Dayton Aviation Heritage National Historical Park, and for other purposes.
A Republican bill with 1 Democratic cosponsor · See the cosponsor
Last activity — Referred to the House Committee on Natural Resources.
In committee
Introduced and handed to a committee in the chamber it started in.
The committee holds it, and most bills are never heard from again. A hearing or a committee vote would be news; silence is the usual outcome, and it kills the bill without anyone voting against it.
Its path through Congress
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
This bill proposes an amendment to the Dayton Aviation Heritage Preservation Act of 1992. The primary purpose is to adjust the boundary of the Dayton Aviation Heritage National Historical Park. Specifically, it seeks to include approximately 1 acre of land located in Dayton, Ohio. This land is identified as the 'Proposed Addition' on a specific map dated February 2023.
Yes· 3 of 4
- Scored +3
Would Black Americans be better off under this?
Expanding the Dayton Aviation Heritage National Historical Park preserves sites integral to African American aviation history.
- Scored +2
Would people in cities be better off under this?
The addition of park land occurs within the city of Dayton, providing local urban residents with expanded historical resources.
- Scored +2
Does this better protect air, water and wildlife?
The bill expands the acreage of a National Historical Park, which provides enhanced preservation of historical and environmental land.
The opposite
No question was scored the opposite.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
- Park Expansion: The bill adjusts the boundary to include approximately 1 acre of land in Dayton, Ohio, which adds to the existing sites described in the original 1992 Act (Section 1).
Potential Negative Impacts for People
- No negative impacts are explicitly mentioned in the text.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Tap or hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Would Black Americans be better off under this? — Expanding the Dayton Aviation Heritage National Historical Park preserves sites integral to African American aviation history. Would people in cities be better off under this? — The addition of park land occurs within the city of Dayton, providing local urban residents with expanded historical resources.
- Environment Energy And Infrastructure
- Does this better protect air, water and wildlife? — The bill expands the acreage of a National Historical Park, which provides enhanced preservation of historical and environmental land. Does this better protect public land such as parks and forests? — The bill incorporates additional land into the management oversight of the National Historical Park.
- 7/23/2025
- Referred to the House Committee on Natural Resources.
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- Introduced in House
One bill Congress.gov lists as related to this one — companions in the other chamber, earlier versions, and bills this one absorbed or was folded into.
Greg LandsmanDemocrat · Ohio