Dina Titus (D-NV)
Expressing support for "National Public Lands Day" and encouraging the people of the United States to visit public lands on this fee-free day and recognize their spiritual and cultural value, as well as their contribution to the economy of the United States.
A Democratic resolution with 6 Republican cosponsors · See all 34 cosponsors
Last activity — Referred to the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform.
In committee
Introduced and handed to a committee in the chamber it started in.
The committee holds it, and most bills are never heard from again. A hearing or a committee vote would be news; silence is the usual outcome, and it kills the bill without anyone voting against it.
Its path through Congress
- Introduced
- In Committee
A House resolution is the House speaking for itself: stating a position, honouring someone, or setting its own rules. Adopting it is the whole process. Once the House agrees to it, it is officially the House's word; it is not a law, so the Senate and the President have no part in it.
What this bill would do
This resolution expresses support for "National Public Lands Day." It encourages the people of the United States to visit public lands on this specific fee-free day. The text highlights the spiritual, cultural, and economic value of these lands. It also notes the importance of agencies like the National Park Service and the Bureau of Land Management in preserving these areas. Finally, the resolution acknowledges the historical impact and the role of volunteers in maintaining national treasures.
Yes· 3 of 8
- Scored +2
Would households on low incomes be better off under this?
The fee-free day allows low-income households to visit public lands without the burden of entrance fees.
- Scored +2
Would middle-income households be better off under this?
The resolution encourages free access to public lands for all citizens through fee-free days.
- Scored +2
Would people in rural areas be better off under this?
The resolution highlights the importance of public lands in supporting rural economies and traditions.
The opposite
No question was scored the opposite.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Financial Savings for Visitors: The resolution encourages people to visit public lands on a "fee-free day," which allows for access without the usual costs associated with visiting certain areas. (Resolution Text)
-
Economic and Job Benefits: The text notes that public lands serve as a major economic engine, with the Bureau of Land Management generating approximately $252,000,000,000 in economic output and nearly 950,000 jobs in fiscal year 2024. (Resolution Text)
-
Cultural and Spiritual Value: The resolution recognizes that public lands hold great cultural and spiritual significance for the people of the United States. (Resolution Text)
-
Support for Rural Economies: The text states that public lands have a historic role in supporting rural economies, cultural traditions, and community livelihoods. (Resolution Text)
Potential Negative Impacts for People
- No negative impacts are explicitly stated in the provided text.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Tap or hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Would households on low incomes be better off under this? — The fee-free day allows low-income households to visit public lands without the burden of entrance fees. Would middle-income households be better off under this? — The resolution encourages free access to public lands for all citizens through fee-free days. Would people in rural areas be better off under this? — The resolution highlights the importance of public lands in supporting rural economies and traditions.
- Environment Energy And Infrastructure
- Does this better protect air, water and wildlife? — The resolution acknowledges the role of federal agencies in preserving national treasures and biodiversity. Does this invest in rural communities? — The text states that public lands have a historic role in supporting rural economies and community livelihoods.
- Economy And Finance
- Is this likely to grow the economy? — The text notes that public lands serve as a major economic engine and contributor to the national economy. Is this likely to create jobs? — The resolution highlights the significant role of public lands in supporting nearly 950,000 jobs.
- Social Issues And Justice
- Does this make housing cost less? — Access to public lands through fee-free days provides a low-cost recreational opportunity for families.
- 10/8/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 10/3/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 9/26/2025
- Submitted in House
- Referred to the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform.
- 32 Cosponsors added.
One bill Congress.gov lists as related to this one — companions in the other chamber, earlier versions, and bills this one absorbed or was folded into.
Yassamin AnsariDemocrat · Arizona
Suzanne BonamiciDemocrat · Oregon
Julia BrownleyDemocrat · California
Ed CaseDemocrat · Hawaii
Emanuel CleaverDemocrat · Missouri
Judy ChuDemocrat · California
Troy CarterDemocrat · Louisiana
Juan CiscomaniRepublican · Arizona
Diana DeGetteDemocrat · Colorado
Adriano EspaillatDemocrat · New York
Veronica EscobarDemocrat · Texas
Gabe EvansRepublican · Colorado
Sarah ElfrethDemocrat · Maryland
Brian FitzpatrickRepublican · Pennsylvania
Steven HorsfordDemocrat · Nevada
Val HoyleDemocrat · Oregon
Raja KrishnamoorthiDemocrat · Illinois
Young KimRepublican · California
Susie LeeDemocrat · Nevada
Nick LaLotaRepublican · New York
Michael LawlerRepublican · New York
George LatimerDemocrat · New York
Grace MengDemocrat · New York
Eleanor NortonDemocrat · District of Columbia
Joe NeguseDemocrat · Colorado
Brittany PettersenDemocrat · Colorado
Mike QuigleyDemocrat · Illinois
Adam SmithDemocrat · Washington
Thomas SuozziDemocrat · New York
Greg StantonDemocrat · Arizona
Ritchie TorresDemocrat · New York
Juan VargasDemocrat · California
Gabe VasquezDemocrat · New Mexico
Bonnie Watson ColemanDemocrat · New Jersey