Dina Titus (D-NV)
Expressing support for "National Public Lands Day" and encouraging the people of the United States to visit public lands on this fee-free day and recognize their spiritual and cultural value, as well as their contribution to the economy of the United States.
A Democratic resolution with 4 Republican cosponsors · See all 25 cosponsors
Last activity — Referred to the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform.
In committee
Introduced and handed to a committee in the chamber it started in.
The committee holds it, and most bills are never heard from again. A hearing or a committee vote would be news; silence is the usual outcome, and it kills the bill without anyone voting against it.
Its path through Congress
- Introduced
- In Committee
A House resolution is the House speaking for itself: stating a position, honouring someone, or setting its own rules. Adopting it is the whole process. Once the House agrees to it, it is officially the House's word; it is not a law, so the Senate and the President have no part in it.
What this bill would do
This resolution expresses support for National Public Lands Day. It encourages people in the United States to visit public lands on this fee-free day. The bill highlights the spiritual, cultural, and economic value of public lands. It acknowledges the work of agencies and staff who preserve these lands. It also notes the economic output, recreation visits, and volunteer efforts associated with public lands.
Yes· 3 of 11
- Scored +3
Would households on low incomes be better off under this?
Fee-free access to public lands removes financial barriers, making outdoor recreation more affordable for low-income households.
- Scored +3
Does this better protect air, water and wildlife?
The resolution highlights the importance of preserving and managing public lands and supporting agencies dedicated to conservation.
- Scored +3
Does this better protect public land such as parks and forests?
The resolution expresses support for National Public Lands Day and recognizes the vital role of agencies in managing and preserving public lands.
The opposite
No question was scored the opposite.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
- Fee-free access to public lands: The resolution encourages people to visit public lands on a fee-free day, which can make outdoor spaces more accessible to individuals and families without the burden of entry fees. This is supported by the main resolving clause.
Potential Negative Impacts for People
- No negative impacts identified: The provided text does not contain any specific sections or provisions that outline negative consequences or burdens for individuals or groups of people in the United States.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Tap or hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Would households on low incomes be better off under this? — Fee-free access to public lands removes financial barriers, making outdoor recreation more affordable for low-income households. Would children be better off under this? — Encouraging visits to public lands on a fee-free day provides accessible recreational and educational opportunities for children and families. Would people in middle age be better off under this? — Fee-free access to public lands encourages recreational activities for individuals and families. Would middle-income households be better off under this? — Fee-free access to public lands provides affordable recreational opportunities for middle-class families. Would people in rural areas be better off under this? — The resolution acknowledges the historic role of public lands in supporting rural economies and community livelihoods. Would people over 65 be better off under this? — Promoting public lands and fee-free access supports recreational opportunities accessible to seniors. Would people in cities be better off under this? — Encouraging visits to public lands promotes outdoor access for urban residents seeking nature and recreation. Would veterans be better off under this, taking everything together? — Public lands offer recreational and therapeutic outdoor opportunities that can benefit veterans. Would people in their twenties and thirties be better off under this? — Promoting outdoor recreation and fee-free access to public lands benefits young adults who frequently engage in outdoor activities.
- Environment Energy And Infrastructure
- Does this better protect air, water and wildlife? — The resolution highlights the importance of preserving and managing public lands and supporting agencies dedicated to conservation. Does this better protect public land such as parks and forests? — The resolution expresses support for National Public Lands Day and recognizes the vital role of agencies in managing and preserving public lands.
- 10/1/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 9/24/2026
- Submitted in House
- Referred to the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform.
- 24 Cosponsors added.
One bill Congress.gov lists as related to this one — companions in the other chamber, earlier versions, and bills this one absorbed or was folded into.
Suzanne BonamiciDemocrat · Oregon
Julia BrownleyDemocrat · California
Janelle BynumDemocrat · Oregon
Ed CaseDemocrat · Hawaii
Judy ChuDemocrat · California
Salud CarbajalDemocrat · California
Troy CarterDemocrat · Louisiana
Juan CiscomaniRepublican · Arizona
Debbie DingellDemocrat · Michigan
Veronica EscobarDemocrat · Texas
Gabe EvansRepublican · Colorado
Steven HorsfordDemocrat · Nevada
Val HoyleDemocrat · Oregon
Raja KrishnamoorthiDemocrat · Illinois
Young KimRepublican · California
Susie LeeDemocrat · Nevada
Michael LawlerRepublican · New York
Seth MoultonDemocrat · Massachusetts
Eleanor NortonDemocrat · District of Columbia
Joe NeguseDemocrat · Colorado
Brittany PettersenDemocrat · Colorado
Mike QuigleyDemocrat · Illinois
Raul RuizDemocrat · California
Greg StantonDemocrat · Arizona
Gabe VasquezDemocrat · New Mexico