Chrissy Houlahan (D-PA)
Expressing support for "Military Sexual Trauma Awareness Day".
A Democratic resolution with 3 Republican cosponsors · See all 16 cosponsors
Last activity — Referred to the Committee on Armed Services, and in addition to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
In committee
Introduced and handed to a committee in the chamber it started in.
The committee holds it, and most bills are never heard from again. A hearing or a committee vote would be news; silence is the usual outcome, and it kills the bill without anyone voting against it.
Its path through Congress
- Introduced
- In Committee
A House resolution is the House speaking for itself: stating a position, honouring someone, or setting its own rules. Adopting it is the whole process. Once the House agrees to it, it is officially the House's word; it is not a law, so the Senate and the President have no part in it.
What this bill would do
This resolution expresses support for establishing Military Sexual Trauma Awareness Day. It notes that military sexual trauma affects both women and men in the Armed Forces, leading to lasting health and personal impacts. The text acknowledges the need to break the stigma surrounding the trauma and improve support systems for survivors and their families. It encourages the Department of Defense and the Department of Veterans Affairs to expand access to related services. Additionally, the measure promotes transparency, accountability, and efforts to address the root causes of military sexual trauma to eradicate it.
Yes· 3 of 13
- Scored +6
Would veterans be better off under this, taking everything together?
The resolution encourages expanding access to specialized services for all veterans through the Department of Veterans Affairs.
- Scored +5
Would women be better off under this?
The resolution addresses the high prevalence of MST among women and commits to improving their support and care.
- Scored +5
Would men be better off under this?
The resolution addresses the prevalence of MST among men and commits to improving their support and care.
The opposite
No question was scored the opposite.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Affirming Support and Care: Under resolved clause (2), the House of Representatives affirms its commitment to supporting military sexual trauma survivors and acknowledges the importance of providing them with the highest quality care and support. This is positive because it shows official recognition and a commitment to helping those affected.
-
Expanding Services: Under resolved clause (4), the text encourages the Department of Defense and Department of Veterans Affairs to continue efforts to expand access to military sexual trauma-related services, ensuring these services are well-publicized and accessible to all veterans. This is positive because it aims to make crucial help easier for veterans to find and use.
-
Promoting Accountability: Under resolved clause (5), the measure promotes transparency and accountability in the handling of military sexual trauma cases to build trust and ensure that survivors receive the support they need without fear of retaliation or discrimination. This is positive because it aims to protect survivors when they come forward for help.
Potential Negative Impacts for People
- The provided text does not contain any specific sections or provisions that outline negative consequences or burdens for individuals or groups of people.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Tap or hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Would veterans be better off under this, taking everything together? — The resolution encourages expanding access to specialized services for all veterans through the Department of Veterans Affairs. Would men be better off under this? — The resolution addresses the prevalence of MST among men and commits to improving their support and care. Would women be better off under this? — The resolution addresses the high prevalence of MST among women and commits to improving their support and care. Would Black Americans be better off under this? — The text acknowledges that survivors from marginalized and minority groups face unique barriers to care that the resolution aims to address. Would Asian Americans be better off under this? — The text acknowledges that survivors from marginalized and minority groups face unique barriers to care that the resolution aims to address. Would Hispanic Americans be better off under this? — The text acknowledges that survivors from marginalized and minority groups face unique barriers to care that the resolution aims to address. Would LGBTQ people be better off under this? — The text highlights that survivors from marginalized groups face additional barriers to care which the resolution intends to mitigate. Would Native Americans be better off under this? — The text acknowledges that survivors from marginalized and minority groups face unique barriers to care that the resolution aims to address. Would white Americans be better off under this? — The text acknowledges that survivors from marginalized and minority groups face unique barriers to care that the resolution aims to address.
- Healthcare
- Does this make mental health care easier to get? — The resolution encourages expanding access to services related to MST, which includes impacts on PTSD, depression, and anxiety.
- National Security And Foreign Policy
- Does this increase the pay, pensions or support veterans receive? — The resolution encourages the Department of Veterans Affairs to expand access to MST-related services for all veterans.
- Governance And Ideology
- Does this make what the government does easier for the public to see? — The resolution promotes transparency and accountability in how the Department of Defense handles MST cases.
- Social Issues And Justice
- Does this narrow racial gaps in how people are treated? — The text notes that survivors from marginalized and minority groups face additional barriers to care and calls for improving support systems.
- 11/17/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 10/8/2025
- 5 Cosponsors added.
- 9/30/2025
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 9/26/2025
- Submitted in House
- Referred to the Committee on Armed Services, and in addition to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
- 8 Cosponsors added.
One bill Congress.gov lists as related to this one — companions in the other chamber, earlier versions, and bills this one absorbed or was folded into.
Julia BrownleyDemocrat · California
Don BaconRepublican · Nebraska
Nikki BudzinskiDemocrat · Illinois
Becca BalintDemocrat · Vermont
André CarsonDemocrat · Indiana
Jason CrowDemocrat · Colorado
Maggie GoodlanderDemocrat · New Hampshire
Raja KrishnamoorthiDemocrat · Illinois
Young KimRepublican · California
Seth MoultonDemocrat · Massachusetts
James MoylanRepublican · Guam
Dave MinDemocrat · California
Chellie PingreeDemocrat · Maine
Mikie SherrillDemocrat · New Jersey
Andrea SalinasDemocrat · Oregon
Rashida TlaibDemocrat · Michigan