Chrissy Houlahan (D-PA)
Expressing support for "Military Sexual Trauma Awareness Day".
A Democratic resolution with 10 Democratic cosponsors · See all 10 cosponsors
Last activity — Referred to the Committee on Armed Services, and in addition to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
In committee
Introduced and handed to a committee in the chamber it started in.
The committee holds it, and most bills are never heard from again. A hearing or a committee vote would be news; silence is the usual outcome, and it kills the bill without anyone voting against it.
Its path through Congress
- Introduced
- In Committee
A House resolution is the House speaking for itself: stating a position, honouring someone, or setting its own rules. Adopting it is the whole process. Once the House agrees to it, it is officially the House's word; it is not a law, so the Senate and the President have no part in it.
What this bill would do
This resolution expresses support for designating September 25, 2026, as Military Sexual Trauma Awareness Day. It acknowledges that military sexual trauma, or MST, involves sexual assault or threatening sexual harassment during military service. The text points out that MST affects both women and men, leading to long-lasting impacts like PTSD, depression, and increased suicide risks. The House of Representatives commits to supporting survivors and improving the quality of care they receive. Furthermore, the resolution encourages federal departments to expand services, promote transparency, and work toward eradicating MST.
Yes· 3 of 13
- Scored +5
Would women be better off under this?
The resolution highlights that women are disproportionately affected by MST and emphasizes the need for better support and care.
- Scored +5
Would veterans be better off under this, taking everything together?
The resolution encourages the Department of Veterans Affairs to expand access to specialized services for veterans.
- Scored +5
Does this make mental health care easier to get?
The resolution emphasizes the need to expand access to services related to the significant mental health impacts of MST, such as PTSD and anxiety.
The opposite
No question was scored the opposite.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Under Resolved clause (4), the resolution encourages the Department of Defense and the Department of Veterans Affairs to expand access to MST-related services and ensure they are accessible to all veterans. This is a positive step because it aims to make necessary support easier for survivors to reach.
-
Under Resolved clause (5), the measure promotes transparency and accountability in how both departments handle MST cases. This is beneficial because it helps build trust and works to ensure survivors get support without fear of retaliation or discrimination.
-
Under Resolved clause (6), the text underscores a commitment to working with the Department of Defense to address the root problems and causes of MST with the goal of eradicating it. This could positively impact people by aiming to stop the trauma before it happens.
Potential Negative Impacts for People
- Based on the provided text, there are no specific sections or provisions identified that create negative consequences or burdens for individuals or groups of people in the United States.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Tap or hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Would veterans be better off under this, taking everything together? — The resolution encourages the Department of Veterans Affairs to expand access to specialized services for veterans. Would women be better off under this? — The resolution highlights that women are disproportionately affected by MST and emphasizes the need for better support and care. Would men be better off under this? — The resolution acknowledges that men also experience MST and calls for improved support systems for all survivors. Would Black Americans be better off under this? — The text notes that marginalized groups face specific barriers to receiving MST-related care. Would Asian Americans be better off under this? — The text notes that marginalized groups face specific barriers to receiving MST-related care. Would Hispanic Americans be better off under this? — The text notes that marginalized groups face specific barriers to receiving MST-related care. Would LGBTQ people be better off under this? — The text notes that survivors from marginalized groups encounter additional stressors and barriers to care. Would Native Americans be better off under this? — The text notes that marginalized groups face specific barriers to receiving MST-related care. Would white Americans be better off under this? — The resolution applies to all service members, including white Americans who may experience MST.
- Healthcare
- Does this make mental health care easier to get? — The resolution emphasizes the need to expand access to services related to the significant mental health impacts of MST, such as PTSD and anxiety.
- National Security And Foreign Policy
- Does this increase the pay, pensions or support veterans receive? — The resolution calls on the Department of Veterans Affairs to expand access to MST-related services for all veterans.
- Governance And Ideology
- Does this make what the government does easier for the public to see? — The resolution promotes transparency and accountability in how the Department of Defense and Department of Veterans Affairs handle MST cases.
- Social Issues And Justice
- Does this narrow racial gaps in how people are treated? — The text acknowledges that survivors from marginalized and minority groups face additional stressors and barriers to care.
- 9/24/2026
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 9/17/2026
- Submitted in House
- Referred to the Committee on Armed Services, and in addition to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
- 8 Cosponsors added.
2 bills Congress.gov lists as related to this one — companions in the other chamber, earlier versions, and bills this one absorbed or was folded into.
Julia BrownleyDemocrat · California
Becca BalintDemocrat · Vermont
André CarsonDemocrat · Indiana
Jason CrowDemocrat · Colorado
Maggie GoodlanderDemocrat · New Hampshire
Seth MoultonDemocrat · Massachusetts
Dave MinDemocrat · California
Chellie PingreeDemocrat · Maine
Andrea SalinasDemocrat · Oregon
Rashida TlaibDemocrat · Michigan