Dan Crenshaw (R-TX)
Establishing the Select Committee to Defeat the Mexican Drug Cartels.
A Republican resolution with 1 Democratic cosponsor · See all 23 cosponsors
Last activity — Referred to the House Committee on Rules.
In committee
Introduced and handed to a committee in the chamber it started in.
The committee holds it, and most bills are never heard from again. A hearing or a committee vote would be news; silence is the usual outcome, and it kills the bill without anyone voting against it.
Its path through Congress
- Introduced
- In Committee
A House resolution is the House speaking for itself: stating a position, honouring someone, or setting its own rules. Adopting it is the whole process. Once the House agrees to it, it is officially the House's word; it is not a law, so the Senate and the President have no part in it.
What this bill would do
This resolution establishes a Select Committee in the House of Representatives aimed at defeating the Mexican drug cartels. The committee is composed of up to 21 members, including representatives from several specific existing committees. Its primary authority is to investigate the operations of the cartels and their international networks, as well as government efforts to target them. While the committee has investigative jurisdiction, it does not have the authority to take legislative action itself. The committee is tasked with submitting policy recommendations and legislative proposals to the House and relevant standing committees. All final reports must be submitted to the House by December 31, 2026.
Yes· 3 of 10
- Scored +4
Does this tighten control of the border?
Targeting cartels is a key component of efforts to secure the border and disrupt illegal activities.
- Scored +3
Does this put more money into stopping terrorism?
The investigation of international cartel networks aligns with counter-transnational criminal organization efforts.
- Scored +3
Does this make what the government does easier for the public to see?
The committee is mandated to make its reports and findings available to the general public.
The opposite
No question was scored the opposite.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Investigative Oversight: The committee is authorized to investigate the operations, capabilities, and international networks of the Mexican drug cartels, as well as the efforts by the United States, Mexico, and other governments to defeat them (Section 1(b)(2)). This could lead to a better understanding of how these networks function.
-
Policy Recommendations: The committee is tasked with submitting policy recommendations to relevant standing committees by December 31, 2025 (Section 1(e)). This process could result in new strategies to address the drug cartels.
-
Public Transparency: The committee is required to make its reports and proposals available to the general public in widely accessible formats within 30 days of completion (Section 1(f)(1)). This ensures that the findings of their investigations are available to the citizens.
Potential Negative Impacts for People
- Lack of Legislative Authority: The committee is explicitly prohibited from having legislative jurisdiction or the authority to take legislative action on any bill or resolution (Section 1(b)(1)). This means the committee can only recommend changes, not implement them directly.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Tap or hover a score for the reason it gave.
- National Security And Foreign Policy
- Does this put more money into stopping terrorism? — The investigation of international cartel networks aligns with counter-transnational criminal organization efforts. Does this strengthen ties with allied countries? — The investigation involves cooperation and oversight regarding U.S. and Mexican government efforts.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Would Hispanic Americans be better off under this? — Addressing cartel violence can provide security benefits for Hispanic communities in the U.S. and Mexico. Would households on low incomes be better off under this? — Disrupting cartels may lead to safer communities and reduced drug-related harm for vulnerable populations. Would people in rural areas be better off under this? — Addressing cartels can improve safety in rural areas often used for trafficking routes. Would people in cities be better off under this? — Reducing cartel activity may decrease crime rates in urban areas susceptible to drug trafficking.
- Governance And Ideology
- Does this make what the government does easier for the public to see? — The committee is mandated to make its reports and findings available to the general public. Does this give the federal government more power? — The establishment of a new Select Committee increases the investigative reach of the House of Representatives.
- Social Issues And Justice
- Does this tighten control of the border? — Targeting cartels is a key component of efforts to secure the border and disrupt illegal activities.
- Healthcare
- Does this do more about addiction and overdose deaths? — The investigation of drug cartels may indirectly assist in combating the drug supply fueling the opioid crisis.
- 4/30/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 3/31/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 3/27/2025
- Submitted in House
- Referred to the House Committee on Rules.
- 21 Cosponsors added.
Jodey ArringtonRepublican · Texas
Brian BabinRepublican · Texas
Mike BostRepublican · Illinois
Jack BergmanRepublican · Michigan
Andy BiggsRepublican · Arizona
Tom ColeRepublican · Oklahoma
James ComerRepublican · Kentucky
Juan CiscomaniRepublican · Arizona
Sam GravesRepublican · Missouri
Brett GuthrieRepublican · Kentucky
Vicente GonzalezDemocrat · Texas
Mark GreenRepublican · Tennessee
Michael GuestRepublican · Mississippi
J. HillRepublican · Arkansas
Jim JordanRepublican · Ohio
Michael McCaulRepublican · Texas
Brian MastRepublican · Florida
Mike RogersRepublican · Alabama
Pete StauberRepublican · Minnesota
Bryan SteilRepublican · Wisconsin
Glenn ThompsonRepublican · Pennsylvania
Roger WilliamsRepublican · Texas
Bruce WestermanRepublican · Arkansas