Dina Titus (D-NV)
Amending the Rules of the House of Representatives to prohibit Members, officers, and employees of the House of Representatives from participating in prediction markets in certain cases, and for other purposes.
A Democratic resolution with 1 Republican cosponsor · See all 28 cosponsors
Last activity — Referred to the Committee on Ethics, and in addition to the Committees on the Judiciary, and Oversight and Government Reform, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
In committee
Introduced and handed to a committee in the chamber it started in.
The committee holds it, and most bills are never heard from again. A hearing or a committee vote would be news; silence is the usual outcome, and it kills the bill without anyone voting against it.
Its path through Congress
- Introduced
- In Committee
A House resolution is the House speaking for itself: stating a position, honouring someone, or setting its own rules. Adopting it is the whole process. Once the House agrees to it, it is officially the House's word; it is not a law, so the Senate and the President have no part in it.
What this bill would do
This resolution seeks to amend the Rules of the House of Representatives. It aims to prohibit Members, Delegates, Resident Commissioners, officers, and employees from participating in certain prediction markets. Specifically, it bars these individuals from entering into agreements or transactions involving excluded commodities that depend on the occurrence of specific events. The rule does not apply to insurance with a lawful insurable interest or lawful sports wagers. Additionally, the resolution expresses a sense that the executive and judicial branches should consider similar restrictions.
Yes
- Scored +3
Does this make what the government does easier for the public to see?
The bill increases transparency and integrity by preventing House members and staff from profiting from event-based prediction markets.
The opposite
- Scored -2
Would people with substantial wealth be better off under this?
The bill limits the ability of high-earning government officials to engage in specific types of speculative financial transactions.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
- Prohibition on prediction market trading: This provision prevents House Members, officers, and employees from entering into transactions involving excluded commodities that are dependent on specific events (Section 1, clause 22a).
Potential Negative Impacts for People
- No specific negative impacts are explicitly detailed in the text provided.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Tap or hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Governance And Ideology
- Does this make what the government does easier for the public to see? — The bill increases transparency and integrity by preventing House members and staff from profiting from event-based prediction markets.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Would people with substantial wealth be better off under this? — The bill limits the ability of high-earning government officials to engage in specific types of speculative financial transactions.
- 8/27/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 7/20/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 6/23/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 6/18/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 6/9/2026
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 6/3/2026
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 5/29/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 5/20/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 5/15/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 5/13/2026
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 5/12/2026
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 5/11/2026
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 5/7/2026
- 6 Cosponsors added.
- 5/4/2026
- 5 Cosponsors added.
- 4/30/2026
- Submitted in House
- Referred to the Committee on Ethics, and in addition to the Committees on the Judiciary, and Oversight and Government Reform, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Jake AuchinclossDemocrat · Massachusetts
Julia BrownleyDemocrat · California
Joaquin CastroDemocrat · Texas
Salud CarbajalDemocrat · California
Angie CraigDemocrat · Minnesota
Jason CrowDemocrat · Colorado
Rosa DeLauroDemocrat · Connecticut
Christopher DeluzioDemocrat · Pennsylvania
Suzan DelBeneDemocrat · Washington
Sharice DavidsDemocrat · Kansas
Daniel GoldmanDemocrat · New York
Maggie GoodlanderDemocrat · New Hampshire
Adelita GrijalvaDemocrat · Arizona
Jared HuffmanDemocrat · California
Raja KrishnamoorthiDemocrat · Illinois
Stephen LynchDemocrat · Massachusetts
Mike LevinDemocrat · California
Anna Paulina LunaRepublican · Florida
Seth MoultonDemocrat · Massachusetts
Seth MagazinerDemocrat · Rhode Island
Eleanor NortonDemocrat · District of Columbia
Mark PocanDemocrat · Wisconsin
Raul RuizDemocrat · California
Norma TorresDemocrat · California
Rashida TlaibDemocrat · Michigan
Lori TrahanDemocrat · Massachusetts
Gabe VasquezDemocrat · New Mexico
Eugene VindmanDemocrat · Virginia