Daniel Goldman (D-NY)
Jewish American Security Act
A Democratic bill with 51 Republican cosponsors · See all 101 cosponsors
Last activity — Referred to the Subcommittee on Counterterrorism and Intelligence.
In committee
Introduced and handed to a committee in the chamber it started in.
The committee holds it, and most bills are never heard from again. A hearing or a committee vote would be news; silence is the usual outcome, and it kills the bill without anyone voting against it.
Its path through Congress
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
This bill aims to ramp up federal efforts to fight antisemitism and protect the Jewish community across the United States. It sets up an antisemitism coordinator within the Department of Education and requires schools receiving federal funds to follow specific civil rights guidelines and grievance procedures. The legislation also boosts funding for the Nonprofit Security Grant Program to help secure community spaces and religious institutions. Furthermore, it mandates joint annual threat assessments from federal law enforcement and intelligence agencies regarding domestic and transnational violent extremism. Finally, the bill requires large online platforms to publish regular transparency reports detailing their content moderation practices regarding antisemitic material.
Yes· 3 of 12
- Scored +8
Does this put more rules on large technology companies?
Imposes strict transparency reporting and FTC penalties on large online platforms.
- Scored +7
Would students be better off under this?
Mandates coordinators and grievance procedures to protect students from discrimination.
- Scored +7
Does this protect the freedom to practise a religion?
Provides significant funding and policing to protect houses of worship from hate crimes.
The opposite· 3 of 9
- Scored -5
Does this reduce what the federal government spends?
Significantly increases funding for the Nonprofit Security Grant Program.
- Scored -4
Would business owners be better off under this?
Imposes new reporting burdens and legal penalties on large online platform owners.
- Scored -4
Would billionaires be better off under this?
Increases regulatory risk for owners of major tech platforms.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Protecting Jewish Students: Section 4 requires schools receiving federal funds to designate a specific Title VI coordinator, adopt clear nondiscrimination policies, and set up grievance procedures to report and investigate discrimination. This helps ensure a safer learning environment for Jewish students by giving them clear avenues to report harassment and requiring schools to take corrective action.
-
Securing Community Spaces: Section 5 increases the authorization of appropriations for the Nonprofit Security Grant Program to one billion dollars for each fiscal year from 2027 through 2031. This provides significantly more resources to help nonprofit organizations and religious institutions enhance their physical security against threats and violence.
-
Online Transparency: Section 6 requires major online platforms with at least 50 million monthly users to submit and publish regular transparency reports on their content moderation practices. This makes companies more accountable for how they handle, remove, or limit antisemitic content on their digital networks.
Potential Negative Impacts for People
-
Regulatory and Compliance Burdens: Section 4 imposes numerous administrative and reporting duties on schools and educational institutions, such as annual training requirements, maintaining records for seven years, and publicizing new procedures. Smaller schools or districts might struggle with the sheer volume of paperwork and operational adjustments required to stay compliant.
-
Reporting Costs for Tech Companies: Section 6 forces online platforms to compile and publish highly detailed data metrics regarding content moderation, automated systems, and account suspensions. This creates a heavy compliance burden and potential operational costs for managing these extensive reporting frameworks.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Tap or hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Would students be better off under this? — Mandates coordinators and grievance procedures to protect students from discrimination. Would children be better off under this? — Increases protections and grievance procedures for students facing discrimination. Would people in their twenties and thirties be better off under this? — Increases protections for college students against antisemitism. Would billionaires be better off under this? — Increases regulatory risk for owners of major tech platforms. Would business owners be better off under this? — Imposes new reporting burdens and legal penalties on large online platform owners.
- National Security And Foreign Policy
- Does this put more money into stopping terrorism? — Mandates joint threat assessments on domestic and transnational antisemitic violent extremism. Does this give the government more power to monitor people inside the country? — Increases monitoring of online platforms and requires detailed reporting on user accounts.
- Economy And Finance
- Does this give people more protection from unfair business practices? — Increases transparency requirements for large online platforms via the FTC. Does this reduce what the federal government spends? — Significantly increases funding for the Nonprofit Security Grant Program. Does this make the government pay for what it commits to? — Increases federal appropriations for security grants. Does this reduce what the federal government owes? — Increases federal spending through expanded grant programs.
- Social Issues And Justice
- Does this protect the freedom to practise a religion? — Provides significant funding and policing to protect houses of worship from hate crimes. Does this narrow racial gaps in how people are treated? — Strengthens Title VI enforcement and reporting for shared ancestry/ethnic characteristics. Does this protect what people are allowed to say in public life? — Increases government surveillance and transparency reports on online speech moderation.
- Education And Technology
- Does this put more rules on large technology companies? — Imposes strict transparency reporting and FTC penalties on large online platforms. Does this give people more control over their personal data? — Requires platforms to share account suspension data and geolocation patterns with the government.
- Governance And Ideology
- Does this give the federal government more power? — Increases federal oversight of school nondiscrimination policies and tech platform moderation. Does this make what the government does easier for the public to see? — Requires public release of declassified threat assessments. Does this protect the individual right to speak freely? — Increases government monitoring of online content and platform moderation practices. Does this protect people from being watched or searched? — Requires reporting of account geolocation and suspension data to federal agencies.
- Environment Energy And Infrastructure
- Does this improve help for people hit by a disaster? — Increases FEMA personnel and resources to manage security grants.
- 11/9/2026
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 10/1/2026
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 9/21/2026
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 9/16/2026
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 9/15/2026
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 9/10/2026
- 4 Cosponsors added.
- 9/8/2026
- 4 Cosponsors added.
- 9/3/2026
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 9/1/2026
- 6 Cosponsors added.
- 8/31/2026
- 8 Cosponsors added.
- 8/27/2026
- 6 Cosponsors added.
- 8/24/2026
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 8/10/2026
- 4 Cosponsors added.
- 8/3/2026
- 4 Cosponsors added.
- 7/30/2026
- 4 Cosponsors added.
- 7/21/2026
- 4 Cosponsors added.
- 7/20/2026
- 4 Cosponsors added.
- 7/9/2026
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 7/7/2026
- Referred to the Subcommittee on Emergency Management and Technology.
- Referred to the Subcommittee on Counterterrorism and Intelligence.
- 7/2/2026
- 4 Cosponsors added.
- 6/24/2026
- 4 Cosponsors added.
- 6/9/2026
- Referred to the Committee on Education and Workforce, and in addition to the Committees on the Judiciary, Homeland Security, Transportation and Infrastructure, and Energy and Commerce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
- 29 Cosponsors added.
- Introduced in House
One bill Congress.gov lists as related to this one — companions in the other chamber, earlier versions, and bills this one absorbed or was folded into.
Jake AuchinclossDemocrat · Massachusetts
Yassamin AnsariDemocrat · Arizona
Vern BuchananRepublican · Florida
Brian BabinRepublican · Texas
Don BaconRepublican · Nebraska
James BairdRepublican · Indiana
Shontel BrownDemocrat · Ohio
Tom BarrettRepublican · Michigan
Michael BaumgartnerRepublican · Washington
Wesley BellDemocrat · Missouri
Janelle BynumDemocrat · Oregon
Jim CostaDemocrat · California
Kathy CastorDemocrat · Florida
Steve CohenDemocrat · Tennessee
Judy ChuDemocrat · California
Earl CarterRepublican · Georgia
Gilbert CisnerosDemocrat · California
Mike CareyRepublican · Ohio
Juan CiscomaniRepublican · Arizona
Donald DavisDemocrat · North Carolina
Suzan DelBeneDemocrat · Washington
Neal DunnRepublican · Florida
Jake EllzeyRepublican · Texas
Charles FleischmannRepublican · Tennessee
Lois FrankelDemocrat · Florida
Brian FitzpatrickRepublican · Pennsylvania
Randy FineRepublican · Florida
Josh GottheimerDemocrat · New Jersey
Lance GoodenRepublican · Texas
Carlos GimenezRepublican · Florida
Craig GoldmanRepublican · Texas
Laura GillenDemocrat · New York
James HimesDemocrat · Connecticut
Bill HuizengaRepublican · Michigan
Steven HorsfordDemocrat · Nevada
Richard HudsonRepublican · North Carolina
J. HillRepublican · Arkansas
Ashley HinsonRepublican · Iowa
David JoyceRepublican · Ohio
Ronny JacksonRepublican · Texas
John JamesRepublican · Michigan
David KustoffRepublican · Tennessee
Young KimRepublican · California
Thomas KeanRepublican · New Jersey
Jennifer KiggansRepublican · Virginia
Timothy KennedyDemocrat · New York
Ted LieuDemocrat · California
Susie LeeDemocrat · Nevada
Mike LevinDemocrat · California
Michael LawlerRepublican · New York
Nicholas LangworthyRepublican · New York
Greg LandsmanDemocrat · Ohio
Morgan LuttrellRepublican · Texas
George LatimerDemocrat · New York
Nicole MalliotakisRepublican · New York
Michael McCaulRepublican · Texas
Grace MengDemocrat · New York
John MoolenaarRepublican · Michigan
Daniel MeuserRepublican · Pennsylvania
Joseph MorelleDemocrat · New York
Jared MoskowitzDemocrat · Florida
Morgan McGarveyDemocrat · Kentucky
Max MillerRepublican · Ohio
Jennifer McClellanDemocrat · Virginia
Ryan MackenzieRepublican · Pennsylvania
John MannionDemocrat · New York
Kristen McDonald RivetDemocrat · Michigan
Sarah McBrideDemocrat · Delaware
Joe NeguseDemocrat · Colorado
Johnny OlszewskiDemocrat · Maryland
August PflugerRepublican · Texas
Scott PetersDemocrat · California
Jimmy PanettaDemocrat · California
Brittany PettersenDemocrat · Colorado
Mike QuigleyDemocrat · Illinois
Guy ReschenthalerRepublican · Pennsylvania
Josh RileyDemocrat · New York
Maria SalazarRepublican · Florida
Brad ShermanDemocrat · California
Marilyn StricklandDemocrat · Washington
Bradley SchneiderDemocrat · Illinois
Darren SotoDemocrat · Florida
Thomas SuozziDemocrat · New York
Greg StantonDemocrat · Arizona
Pete StauberRepublican · Minnesota
Haley StevensDemocrat · Michigan
Hillary ScholtenDemocrat · Michigan
Dina TitusDemocrat · Nevada
William TimmonsRepublican · South Carolina
Marc VeaseyDemocrat · Texas
Jefferson Van DrewRepublican · New Jersey
Derrick Van OrdenRepublican · Wisconsin
Matt Van EppsRepublican · Tennessee
Joe WilsonRepublican · South Carolina
Debbie Wasserman SchultzDemocrat · Florida
Robert WittmanRepublican · Virginia
Ann WagnerRepublican · Missouri
Randy WeberRepublican · Texas
Roger WilliamsRepublican · Texas
James WalkinshawDemocrat · Virginia
Rudy YakymRepublican · Indiana