August Pfluger (R-TX)
Protect Domestic Oil and Gas Small Business Act of 2026
A Republican bill with 2 Democratic cosponsors · See all 29 cosponsors
Last activity — Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
In committee
Introduced and handed to a committee in the chamber it started in.
The committee holds it, and most bills are never heard from again. A hearing or a committee vote would be news; silence is the usual outcome, and it kills the bill without anyone voting against it.
Its path through Congress
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
This bill is known as the Protect Domestic Oil and Gas Small Business Act of 2026. It changes the Clean Air Act to exclude marginal wells from certain standards of performance and other requirements. Under the bill, marginal wells and their owners or operators will not face requirements for monitoring, reporting, record-keeping, conducting fugitive emission surveys, detecting or repairing leaks, or estimating or measuring emissions. State plans submitted to the Administrator are also barred from including standards of performance for marginal wells. Furthermore, any pending enforcement actions related to these requirements for a marginal well must be terminated upon the enactment of the Act.
Yes· 3 of 9
- Scored +7
Would business owners be better off under this?
Owners of marginal oil and gas wells benefit significantly from the removal of costly regulatory and monitoring requirements.
- Scored +7
Does this make it easier to run a small business?
The bill directly benefits small independent domestic oil and gas operators by exempting marginal wells from stringent Clean Air Act requirements.
- Scored +5
Does this leave more decisions to the states?
The bill gives states greater flexibility to exempt marginal wells from standards in their state plans.
The opposite
- Scored -5
Does this cut the pollution that drives climate change?
Exempting marginal wells from Clean Air Act performance and monitoring standards could lead to higher unmitigated emissions.
- Scored -5
Does this better protect air, water and wildlife?
Rolling back air quality standards and terminating pending enforcement actions weakens overall environmental safeguards.
- Scored -2
Does this give the federal government more power?
The bill limits federal administrative oversight and enforcement flexibility regarding certain state air plans.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Section 2(a), adding subsection (k)(1) to the Clean Air Act: This provision states that no standards of performance, monitoring, reporting, record-keeping, leak detection and repair, or emission estimation requirements shall apply to any marginal well or its owner or operator. This could benefit small business owners and operators of marginal wells by relieving them of these specific regulatory burdens and operational requirements.
-
Section 2(b)(2): This section mandates that any pending action to enforce a standard of performance or requirement specified in the new subsection (k)(1) with respect to a marginal well shall be terminated as of the date of enactment. This immediately stops ongoing enforcement actions against owners or operators of these wells.
Potential Negative Impacts for People
- Section 2(a), adding subsection (k)(1) to the Clean Air Act: By excluding marginal wells from requirements such as monitoring, reporting, record-keeping, fugitive emission surveys, and leak detection and repair, the bill removes these specific oversight and maintenance rules for such sites. This means these specific environmental monitoring and reporting protections will no longer apply to marginal wells or their operators.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Tap or hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Would business owners be better off under this? — Owners of marginal oil and gas wells benefit significantly from the removal of costly regulatory and monitoring requirements. Would people in rural areas be better off under this? — Rural communities benefit economically from the continued viability and less-burdened operation of local marginal oil and gas wells.
- Economy And Finance
- Does this make it easier to run a small business? — The bill directly benefits small independent domestic oil and gas operators by exempting marginal wells from stringent Clean Air Act requirements. Is this likely to create jobs? — Relieving regulatory burdens on marginal wells may support employment in small domestic oil and gas operations. Is this likely to grow the economy? — Reducing regulatory overhead for small energy producers can foster business activity in the sector. Is this likely to slow the rise in prices? — Lowering compliance costs for small oil and gas producers could marginally ease energy production costs.
- Environment Energy And Infrastructure
- Does this invest in rural communities? — Marginal wells are frequently located in rural areas, and supporting their operation benefits local rural economies. Is this likely to lower the price at the pump? — Lowering operational costs for marginal wells may help keep domestic energy prices stable. Does this better protect air, water and wildlife? — Rolling back air quality standards and terminating pending enforcement actions weakens overall environmental safeguards. Does this cut the pollution that drives climate change? — Exempting marginal wells from Clean Air Act performance and monitoring standards could lead to higher unmitigated emissions.
- Governance And Ideology
- Does this leave more decisions to the states? — The bill gives states greater flexibility to exempt marginal wells from standards in their state plans. Does this give the federal government more power? — The bill limits federal administrative oversight and enforcement flexibility regarding certain state air plans.
- 9/28/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 9/24/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 9/21/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 9/16/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 9/2/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 8/31/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 8/10/2026
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 7/27/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 7/21/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 7/14/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 7/9/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 6/24/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 6/22/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 6/3/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 6/2/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 5/26/2026
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 5/21/2026
- Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
- 11 Cosponsors added.
- Introduced in House
One bill Congress.gov lists as related to this one — companions in the other chamber, earlier versions, and bills this one absorbed or was folded into.
Jodey ArringtonRepublican · Texas
Stephanie BiceRepublican · Oklahoma
Lauren BoebertRepublican · Colorado
Troy BaldersonRepublican · Ohio
Henry CuellarDemocrat · Texas
Dan CrenshawRepublican · Texas
Mike CareyRepublican · Ohio
Troy DowningRepublican · Montana
Jake EllzeyRepublican · Texas
Ron EstesRepublican · Kansas
Gabe EvansRepublican · Colorado
Vince FongRepublican · California
Julie FedorchakRepublican · North Dakota
H. GriffithRepublican · Virginia
Vicente GonzalezDemocrat · Texas
Craig GoldmanRepublican · Texas
Wesley HuntRepublican · Texas
Frank LucasRepublican · Oklahoma
Robert LattaRepublican · Ohio
Laurel LeeRepublican · Florida
Nicholas LangworthyRepublican · New York
Tracey MannRepublican · Kansas
Tom McClintockRepublican · California
Nathaniel MoranRepublican · Texas
Gary PalmerRepublican · Alabama
Derek SchmidtRepublican · Kansas
Randy WeberRepublican · Texas
Roger WilliamsRepublican · Texas
Ryan ZinkeRepublican · Montana