A Republican bill with 17 Republican cosponsors · See all 17 cosponsors
Last activity — Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committee on Education and Workforce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
In committee
Introduced and handed to a committee in the chamber it started in.
The committee holds it, and most bills are never heard from again. A hearing or a committee vote would be news; silence is the usual outcome, and it kills the bill without anyone voting against it.
Its path through Congress
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
The ASSIMILATION Act aims to overhaul the United States immigration system by implementing a national-interest standard for all admissions. It seeks to replace current family-chain and diversity lottery systems with a merit-based structure focused on economic self-sufficiency and cultural assimilation. The bill modifies various categories of family-sponsored immigration and eliminates the diversity immigrant category. It also reforms employment-based immigration and H-1B visa requirements to prioritize specific economic needs. Additionally, the legislation revises asylum procedures, establishes stricter public charge rules, and implements mandatory employment eligibility verification through E-Verify.
Yes· 3 of 7
- Scored +4
Would union members be better off under this?
The bill aims to protect domestic wages by reforming H-1B and H-2A visa wage methodologies.
- Scored +4
Does this tighten control of the border?
The bill implements stricter enforcement, mandatory E-Verify, and revised parole authority to tighten border control.
- Scored +3
Would high-income households be better off under this?
The bill prioritizes high-compensation, skilled workers in the employment-based immigration system.
The opposite· 3 of 10
- Scored -8
Would immigrants be better off under this?
The bill eliminates diversity visas, raises naturalization requirements, and increases burdens on asylum seekers.
- Scored -6
Does this make it easier for immigrants already here to become citizens?
The bill increases the required period of continuous residence for naturalization from five to ten years.
- Scored -5
Would children be better off under this?
The bill implements family detention for certain unaccompanied children and increases burdens on family-based immigration.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Economic Priority for Skilled Workers: The bill establishes a system where employment-based immigration is tied to a national interest standard, providing clear paths for those in high-paying roles, shortage positions, or strategic federal support roles (Sec. 203).
-
Protection of United States Workers: The legislation includes provisions intended to protect the wages and labor-market opportunities of domestic workers by reforming employment-based immigration and H-1B visas (Sec. 101, Sec. 204).
-
Support for National Interest Occupations: A dedicated list of occupations associated with persistent labor shortages or strategic national needs will be maintained to guide immigration (Sec. 203).
-
Wage Protections for H-2A Workers: The bill updates the wage methodology for H-2A workers to ensure they are not paid less than rates that would adversely affect similarly employed United States workers (Sec. 602).
-
Enhanced Employment Verification: The mandate for E-Verify aims to provide a system for employers to confirm identity and work authorization, which includes an identity authentication service for fraud prevention (Sec. 601).
Potential Negative Impacts for People
-
Elimination of Diversity Visas: The bill removes the diversity immigrant category, which would end the diversity visa lottery system (Sec. 202).
-
Reductions in Family-Sponsored Immigration: The Act redefines immediate relatives and modifies the worldwide level of family-sponsored immigrants, which could impact those seeking to join family members in the United States (Sec. 201).
-
Stricter Naturalization Requirements: The bill increases the required period of continuous residence for naturalization from five years to ten years and raises English proficiency standards (Sec. 402).
-
Increased Burdens for Asylum Seekers: The bill implements a higher "credible fear" standard and introduces a $500 fee for filing asylum applications (Sec. 501, Sec. 502).
-
New Restrictions on Parole: Parole authority is restricted to a maximum of 90 days and cannot be extended or renewed without an Act of Congress (Sec. 304).
-
Stricter Public Charge Rules: The bill establishes a presumption that an alien becomes a public charge if they receive means-tested public benefits for more than 12 months in a 36-month period (Sec. 301).
-
Mandatory Employment Verification Burdens: The bill requires all employers to enroll in and use the E-Verify system for all new hires (Sec. 601).
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Tap or hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Would union members be better off under this? — The bill aims to protect domestic wages by reforming H-1B and H-2A visa wage methodologies. Would high-income households be better off under this? — The bill prioritizes high-compensation, skilled workers in the employment-based immigration system. Would immigrants be better off under this? — The bill eliminates diversity visas, raises naturalization requirements, and increases burdens on asylum seekers. Would children be better off under this? — The bill implements family detention for certain unaccompanied children and increases burdens on family-based immigration. Would Hispanic Americans be better off under this? — The bill reduces family-sponsored immigration and increases hurdles for asylum seekers and unaccompanied children. Would households on low incomes be better off under this? — The bill implements stricter public charge rules that could disproportionately affect low-income individuals seeking status. Would business owners be better off under this? — Mandatory E-Verify enrollment creates new administrative requirements for all employers.
- Social Issues And Justice
- Does this tighten control of the border? — The bill implements stricter enforcement, mandatory E-Verify, and revised parole authority to tighten border control. Does this make it easier for immigrants already here to become citizens? — The bill increases the required period of continuous residence for naturalization from five to ten years. Is this likely to lift people out of poverty? — Stricter public charge rules and increased financial requirements for sponsors may increase economic vulnerability for immigrants. Does this make housing cost less? — The bill restricts family-sponsored immigration and modifies the definition of immediate relatives, potentially reducing housing stability for immigrant families.
- Economy And Finance
- Does this strengthen the rights of workers to organise? — The bill includes wage protections for H-2A workers to prevent adverse effects on domestic wages. Does this make it easier to run a small business? — The mandate for all employers to use the E-Verify system increases administrative burdens for businesses.
- Governance And Ideology
- Does this make what the government does easier for the public to see? — The bill mandates regular reports to Congress regarding the economic and social impact of the new immigration standards.
- Healthcare
- Does this make health care easier to get in general? — The bill requires nonimmigrant parents of citizens to provide proof of health insurance coverage.
- Education And Technology
- Does this put more money into scientific research? — The bill prioritizes employment-based immigration for strategic federal support roles including research and development.
- National Security And Foreign Policy
- Does this better protect the country from computer attacks? — The bill includes provisions for identity authentication services within the E-Verify system to prevent fraud.
- 7/21/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 6/9/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 6/3/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 5/29/2026
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 5/19/2026
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 5/15/2026
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 5/14/2026
- Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committee on Education and Workforce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
- 8 Cosponsors added.
- Introduced in House
One bill Congress.gov lists as related to this one — companions in the other chamber, earlier versions, and bills this one absorbed or was folded into.
Lauren BoebertRepublican · Colorado
Brian BabinRepublican · Texas
Josh BrecheenRepublican · Oklahoma
Andrew ClydeRepublican · Georgia
Elijah CraneRepublican · Arizona
Warren DavidsonRepublican · Ohio
Randy FineRepublican · Florida
Clay FullerRepublican · Georgia
Brandon GillRepublican · Texas
Anna Paulina LunaRepublican · Florida
Morgan LuttrellRepublican · Texas
Mary MillerRepublican · Illinois
Barry MooreRepublican · Alabama
Cory MillsRepublican · Florida
Ralph NormanRepublican · South Carolina
Michael RulliRepublican · Ohio
Keith SelfRepublican · Texas