A Republican bill with 20 Republican cosponsors · See all 20 cosponsors
Last activity — Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
In committee
Introduced and handed to a committee in the chamber it started in.
The committee holds it, and most bills are never heard from again. A hearing or a committee vote would be news; silence is the usual outcome, and it kills the bill without anyone voting against it.
Its path through Congress
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
This bill, known as the "Critical Mineral and Extraction Tax Parity Act," aims to amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986. It seeks to expand the advanced manufacturing production tax credit by adding several new minerals to the list of covered items. The bill also includes specific provisions regarding phosphate and the treatment of ore extraction costs. Additionally, it repeals a specific reduction in the credit amount that currently applies to metallurgical coal. These changes are intended to apply to minerals produced and sold, or costs incurred, after December 31, 2025.
Yes· 3 of 8
- Scored +5
Would business owners be better off under this?
The bill provides significant tax advantages for businesses involved in mineral extraction and manufacturing.
- Scored +4
Is this likely to grow the economy?
The bill encourages domestic mineral production and refining, which supports industrial economic growth.
- Scored +3
Would people in rural areas be better off under this?
The bill benefits sectors that are often centered in rural, resource-rich areas.
The opposite
- Scored -2
Does this reduce how much oil, gas and coal is produced?
The bill specifically makes metallurgical coal more profitable through tax credits, potentially encouraging continued fossil fuel extraction.
- Scored -1
Does this reduce what the federal government owes?
Expanding tax credits typically results in a reduction of federal tax revenue, which could slightly increase the deficit.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Expanded Tax Credit Eligibility: The bill adds several minerals including Boron, Copper, Lead, Metallurgical coal, Potash, Rhenium, Silicon, Silver, and Uranium to the list of covered minerals under Section 45X(c)(6) (Section 2(a)). This expands the scope of the tax credit to include these specific resources.
-
Inclusion of Phosphate: The bill adds phosphate to the list of applicable minerals if it meets specific purity requirements for phosphoric acid or phosphorus (Section 2(a)).
-
Treatment of Extraction Costs: For taxpayers who extract ore that is later refined into a critical mineral, the bill allows extraction costs to be treated as certain production costs under Section 45X(d), provided specific certification and sale requirements are met (Section 2(b)).
-
Benefits for Domestic and Specific Foreign Ore: The bill allows extraction costs to be included if the ore was extracted in the United States, or if the ore was extracted outside the U.S. in a type not extracted in the U.S. in commercial quantities and not in a foreign country of concern (Section 2(b)).
-
Removal of Coal Credit Reduction: The bill repeals the specific 2.5 percent reduction in the credit amount that was previously applied to metallurgical coal (Section 2(c)).
Potential Negative Impacts for People
-
Restrictions on Foreign Ore: Extraction costs for ore extracted outside of the United States may not be eligible for the credit if the ore is of a type already extracted in the United States in commercial quantities, or if it was extracted in a foreign country of concern (Section 2(b)).
-
Regulatory Oversight to Prevent Double Benefits: The Secretary is required to issue regulations or guidance to ensure that the treated extraction costs are not included in the production costs of any applicable critical mineral by any taxpayer, except as provided by the act (Section 2(b)).
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Tap or hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Would business owners be better off under this? — The bill provides significant tax advantages for businesses involved in mineral extraction and manufacturing. Would people in rural areas be better off under this? — The bill benefits sectors that are often centered in rural, resource-rich areas. Would union members be better off under this? — Increased mineral production may lead to more industrial and mining jobs.
- Economy And Finance
- Is this likely to grow the economy? — The bill encourages domestic mineral production and refining, which supports industrial economic growth. Is this likely to create jobs? — By expanding tax credits for various mineral extractions, the bill may incentivize industrial activity and job growth in those sectors. Does this reduce what the federal government owes? — Expanding tax credits typically results in a reduction of federal tax revenue, which could slightly increase the deficit.
- Environment Energy And Infrastructure
- Does this invest in rural communities? — New mineral extraction incentives may benefit rural areas where these resources are located. Does this put more money into wind, solar and other renewable power? — The expansion of credits for minerals like silicon and copper supports the production of renewable energy technologies. Does this reduce how much oil, gas and coal is produced? — The bill specifically makes metallurgical coal more profitable through tax credits, potentially encouraging continued fossil fuel extraction.
- Governance And Ideology
- Does this give the federal government more power? — The bill expands the scope of federal tax credits and requires new regulatory certifications.
- 11/12/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 11/2/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 9/8/2026
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 6/29/2026
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 6/24/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 6/18/2026
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 6/9/2026
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 6/8/2026
- 3 Cosponsors added.
- 6/3/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 5/19/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 5/13/2026
- Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
- 4 Cosponsors added.
- Introduced in House
One bill Congress.gov lists as related to this one — companions in the other chamber, earlier versions, and bills this one absorbed or was folded into.
Robert AderholtRepublican · Alabama
Mark AlfordRepublican · Missouri
Vern BuchananRepublican · Florida
Andy BarrRepublican · Kentucky
Jack BergmanRepublican · Michigan
Aaron BeanRepublican · Florida
Mike CareyRepublican · Ohio
Charles FleischmannRepublican · Tennessee
Paul GosarRepublican · Arizona
Jeff HurdRepublican · Colorado
Tracey MannRepublican · Kansas
Carol MillerRepublican · West Virginia
Barry MooreRepublican · Alabama
Richard McCormickRepublican · Georgia
Max MillerRepublican · Ohio
Nathaniel MoranRepublican · Texas
Burgess OwensRepublican · Utah
Adrian SmithRepublican · Nebraska
Pete StauberRepublican · Minnesota
W. SteubeRepublican · Florida