Mark Pocan (D-WI)
Audit the Pentagon Act of 2026
A Democratic bill with 3 Republican cosponsors · See all 23 cosponsors
Last activity — Referred to the House Committee on Armed Services.
In committee
Introduced and handed to a committee in the chamber it started in.
The committee holds it, and most bills are never heard from again. A hearing or a committee vote would be news; silence is the usual outcome, and it kills the bill without anyone voting against it.
Its path through Congress
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
The "Audit the Pentagon Act of 2026" aims to ensure the Department of Defense achieves a clean audit opinion on its financial statements. The bill addresses findings where the Pentagon failed consecutive audits and was unable to account for significant portions of its assets. If the Comptroller fails to certify an unqualified opinion for a department or agency, funding for that entity will be reduced. These reductions start at 0.5 percent in the initial year and increase to 1.0 percent in subsequent years. The money from these reductions is deposited into the General Fund of the Treasury for deficit reduction. Certain accounts, such as military and reserve personnel, are excluded from these cuts.
Yes· 3 of 6
- Scored +6
Does this make what the government does easier for the public to see?
The bill forces financial accountability by requiring an unqualified audit opinion for Department of Defense elements.
- Scored +5
Does this reduce what the federal government owes?
The bill directs funds from Department of Defense budget reductions to the General Fund of the Treasury for deficit reduction.
- Scored +3
Does this reduce what the federal government spends?
The bill mandates potential spending reductions for Department of Defense elements that fail to achieve an unqualified audit opinion.
The opposite
No question was scored the opposite.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Deficit Reduction: The money taken from failed audits will be used for deficit reduction, depositing funds into the General Fund of the Treasury (Section 4(a)(3)).
-
Protection of Vital Accounts: Reductions will not affect military personnel, reserve personnel, National Guard personnel, or the Defense Health Program (Section 4(b)).
-
Security of Sensitive Programs: The bill ensures that accounting for classified defense programs remains secure and does not require declassification, using auditors with necessary security clearances (Section 3(3)).
Potential Negative Impacts for People
-
Budget Reductions for Defense Elements: If a department or agency fails to achieve an unqualified audit opinion, its funding will be reduced by 0.5 percent or 1.0 percent, applied pro rata against its programs, projects, and activities (Section 4(a)(1) and (2)).
-
Potential Impact on National Security: While the President can waive reductions, the bill notes that applying these cuts could negatively affect national security or members of the Armed Forces serving in combat zones (Section 4(c)(1)).
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Tap or hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Economy And Finance
- Does this reduce what the federal government owes? — The bill directs funds from Department of Defense budget reductions to the General Fund of the Treasury for deficit reduction. Does this reduce what the federal government spends? — The bill mandates potential spending reductions for Department of Defense elements that fail to achieve an unqualified audit opinion.
- Governance And Ideology
- Does this make what the government does easier for the public to see? — The bill forces financial accountability by requiring an unqualified audit opinion for Department of Defense elements.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Would veterans be better off under this, taking everything together? — The bill ensures personnel accounts are excluded from budget cuts to maintain service protections.
- Healthcare
- Does this make health care easier to get in general? — The bill explicitly protects the Defense Health Program from mandatory budget reductions.
- National Security And Foreign Policy
- Does this increase the pay, pensions or support veterans receive? — The bill excludes military and reserve personnel accounts from the proposed funding reductions.
- 8/31/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 5/21/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 2/20/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 2/17/2026
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 2/12/2026
- Referred to the House Committee on Armed Services.
- 18 Cosponsors added.
- Introduced in House
Andy BiggsRepublican · Arizona
Danny DavisDemocrat · Illinois
Lloyd DoggettDemocrat · Texas
Mark DeSaulnierDemocrat · California
Valerie FousheeDemocrat · North Carolina
Glenn GrothmanRepublican · Wisconsin
Jesús GarcíaDemocrat · Illinois
Harriet HagemanRepublican · Wyoming
Pramila JayapalDemocrat · Washington
Summer LeeDemocrat · Pennsylvania
James McGovernDemocrat · Massachusetts
Kweisi MfumeDemocrat · Maryland
Gwen MooreDemocrat · Wisconsin
Jerrold NadlerDemocrat · New York
Eleanor NortonDemocrat · District of Columbia
Ilhan OmarDemocrat · Minnesota
Delia RamirezDemocrat · Illinois
Janice SchakowskyDemocrat · Illinois
Melanie StansburyDemocrat · New Mexico
Lateefah SimonDemocrat · California
Rashida TlaibDemocrat · Michigan
Shri ThanedarDemocrat · Michigan
Bonnie Watson ColemanDemocrat · New Jersey