A Republican bill with 29 Democratic cosponsors · See all 59 cosponsors
Last activity — Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
In committee
Introduced and handed to a committee in the chamber it started in.
The committee holds it, and most bills are never heard from again. A hearing or a committee vote would be news; silence is the usual outcome, and it kills the bill without anyone voting against it.
Its path through Congress
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
This bill, known as the Safeguarding Consumers from Advertising Misconduct Act or the SCAM Act, makes it unlawful for online platforms to display fraudulent or deceptive commercial advertisements if they accepted payment for the ads and failed to take reasonable steps to prevent them. It requires online platforms that accept paid ads to verify the identity of advertisers, implement active impersonation detection programs, and use automated and manual detection systems. Platforms must also provide users with a clear reporting tool and investigate reported ads within 72 hours. If a platform finds an ad violates the law, it must remove it within 24 hours. The bill allows the Federal Trade Commission, State attorneys general, and injured individuals to bring civil actions against violators. Additionally, Section 230(c)(1) of the Communications Act of 1934 will not apply to any violations of this section.
Yes· 3 of 9
- Scored +9
Would people over 65 be better off under this?
The bill protects older adults who are noted in the findings to suffer significant financial losses from digital scams.
- Scored +9
Would retired people be better off under this?
The bill mitigates the specific financial risks identified as being highly prevalent among older populations.
- Scored +8
Does this give people more protection from unfair business practices?
The bill mandates strict advertiser identity verification and active detection systems to prevent fraudulent digital advertisements.
The opposite
No question was scored the opposite.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Identity Verification for Advertisers: Under Section 3(b)(1)(A), online platforms must verify the legal name, physical location, and government-issued identification or business documentation of advertisers before placing paid ads, and take measures to prevent the use of false or stolen identities. This is positive because it helps stop scammers from hiding behind fake accounts and targeting everyday people.
-
Clear Reporting Tools and Fast Investigations: Under Section 3(b)(1)(D) and Section 3(b)(2), platforms must give users a clear tool to report suspicious ads and must investigate those reports within 72 hours. This is positive because it gives people a direct way to fight back and forces companies to act quickly to remove dangerous scams.
-
Right to Sue Scammers and Bad Platforms: Under Section 3(f), individuals who have been injured by a violation can bring a civil action in a federal district court to seek actual damages, restitution, and legal relief. This is positive because it allows everyday folks to hold wrongdoers accountable in court, with courts able to triple the damages if the violation was done willfully or knowingly.
Potential Negative Impacts for People
- Burdens on Legitimate Businesses and Advertisers: Under Section 3(b)(1)(A), anyone wanting to place a paid advertisement must submit detailed personal or business identification, current government-issued identification, and contact information. This might be considered a burden because legitimate small businesses, creators, and individuals will have to jump through extra bureaucratic hoops and share sensitive personal information just to run a simple ad online.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Tap or hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Would retired people be better off under this? — The bill mitigates the specific financial risks identified as being highly prevalent among older populations. Would people over 65 be better off under this? — The bill protects older adults who are noted in the findings to suffer significant financial losses from digital scams. Would households on low incomes be better off under this? — By preventing digital fraud, the bill protects the financial resources of vulnerable households. Would middle-income households be better off under this? — The bill provides better protection against the financial harm caused by deceptive online commercial advertisements. Would people in their twenties and thirties be better off under this? — The bill targets social media scams which disproportionately affect younger demographic groups.
- Governance And Ideology
- Does this protect the right to fair treatment by the courts? — The bill provides individuals with a private right of action to seek actual damages and injunctive relief for fraudulent advertising. Does this make what the government does easier for the public to see? — The bill increases transparency by requiring platforms to provide clear tools for users to report deceptive advertisements.
- Economy And Finance
- Does this give people more protection from unfair business practices? — The bill mandates strict advertiser identity verification and active detection systems to prevent fraudulent digital advertisements.
- Education And Technology
- Does this give people more control over their personal data? — The bill requires platforms to collect and verify personal identification and contact information for advertisers.
- 11/10/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 11/5/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 10/22/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 10/19/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 10/9/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 10/1/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 9/28/2026
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 9/24/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 9/21/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 8/27/2026
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 8/3/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 7/23/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 7/15/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 7/14/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 7/13/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 7/6/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 6/29/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 6/18/2026
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 6/15/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 6/8/2026
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 6/3/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 5/29/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 5/22/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 5/19/2026
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 5/15/2026
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 5/14/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 5/13/2026
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 5/12/2026
- 3 Cosponsors added.
- 4/27/2026
- 3 Cosponsors added.
- 4/16/2026
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 4/14/2026
- 4 Cosponsors added.
- 4/13/2026
- 6 Cosponsors added.
- 3/26/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 3/25/2026
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 3/16/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 3/4/2026
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 2/12/2026
- Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- Introduced in House
One bill Congress.gov lists as related to this one — companions in the other chamber, earlier versions, and bills this one absorbed or was folded into.
Gabe AmoDemocrat · Rhode Island
Andy BarrRepublican · Kentucky
Jack BergmanRepublican · Michigan
André CarsonDemocrat · Indiana
J. CorreaDemocrat · California
Salud CarbajalDemocrat · California
Angie CraigDemocrat · Minnesota
Byron DonaldsRepublican · Florida
Donald DavisDemocrat · North Carolina
Christopher DeluzioDemocrat · Pennsylvania
Monica De La CruzRepublican · Texas
Chuck EdwardsRepublican · North Carolina
Gabe EvansRepublican · Colorado
Lois FrankelDemocrat · Florida
Mike FloodRepublican · Nebraska
Valerie FousheeDemocrat · North Carolina
Laura FriedmanDemocrat · California
Michael GuestRepublican · Mississippi
Maggie GoodlanderDemocrat · New Hampshire
Bill HuizengaRepublican · Michigan
Jahana HayesDemocrat · Connecticut
Pat HarriganRepublican · North Carolina
Julie JohnsonDemocrat · Texas
Young KimRepublican · California
Jennifer KiggansRepublican · Virginia
Zoe LofgrenDemocrat · California
Susie LeeDemocrat · Nevada
Julia LetlowRepublican · Louisiana
Michael LawlerRepublican · New York
Tracey MannRepublican · Kansas
John MoolenaarRepublican · Michigan
Tim MooreRepublican · North Carolina
Sarah McBrideDemocrat · Delaware
Zachary NunnRepublican · Iowa
Scott PetersDemocrat · California
Chris PappasDemocrat · New Hampshire
Brittany PettersenDemocrat · Colorado
Jimmy PatronisRepublican · Florida
John RoseRepublican · Tennessee
Emily RandallDemocrat · Washington
Maria SalazarRepublican · Florida
Pete SessionsRepublican · Texas
Adam SmithDemocrat · Washington
Marlin StutzmanRepublican · Indiana
Thomas SuozziDemocrat · New York
Bryan SteilRepublican · Wisconsin
Melanie StansburyDemocrat · New Mexico
Derek SchmidtRepublican · Kansas
Jefferson ShreveRepublican · Indiana
Suhas SubramanyamDemocrat · Virginia
Dina TitusDemocrat · Nevada
William TimmonsRepublican · South Carolina
Rashida TlaibDemocrat · Michigan
Shri ThanedarDemocrat · Michigan
Jefferson Van DrewRepublican · New Jersey
Gabe VasquezDemocrat · New Mexico
Robert WittmanRepublican · Virginia
Roger WilliamsRepublican · Texas
George WhitesidesDemocrat · California