Jefferson Shreve (R-IN)
Dismantle Foreign Scam Syndicates Act
A Republican bill with 29 Democratic cosponsors · See all 73 cosponsors
Last activity — Ordered to be Reported in the Nature of a Substitute (Amended) by the Yeas and Nays: 48 - 0.
Introduced, nothing more yet
Formally proposed, and not yet handed to a committee.
Nearly every bill is sent to a committee within days. Introduction alone is not a sign of support, of momentum, or of any likelihood of passing — any member may introduce any bill.
Its path through Congress
- Introduced
What this bill would do
This bill creates an interagency task force led by the Secretary of State to shut down transnational criminal syndicates that run online financial scams targeting Americans. It requires the task force to develop a comprehensive government strategy within 180 days to dismantle scam centers and hold corrupt officials accountable. The bill targets human trafficking operations in Southeast Asia where victims are forced to work in these scam compounds under threat of violence. It mandates the President to impose specific sanctions on a listed group of foreign persons and entities involved in these scams within 180 days. Additionally, it authorizes support programs for trafficking victims and appropriates thirty million dollars for the Department of State for fiscal years 2026 and 2027.
Yes· 3 of 17
- Scored +7
Would immigrants be better off under this?
Provides support and reintegration services for trafficking victims forced into scam centers.
- Scored +7
Does this strengthen ties with allied countries?
Mandates coordination with allies and partners to combat transnational crime.
- Scored +7
Does this give people more protection from unfair business practices?
The bill aims to protect U.S. citizens from mass online financial scams and recover stolen assets.
The opposite
- Scored -2
Does this protect the right to fair treatment by the courts?
The broad authority for sanctions based on 'credible evidence' could potentially lead to misidentification.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Support for Trafficking Victims: Section 8 authorizes the Secretary of State to provide trauma-informed care, shelter, reintegration, and support services for victims of human trafficking trapped inside online scam centers. This is positive because it helps rescue and heal individuals forced into labor under the threat of violent punishment.
-
Recovery of Stolen Assets: Section 5(a)(11) lists the recovery and return of stolen assets to defrauded United States persons as an objective of the task force strategy. This is beneficial for everyday Americans who have lost their life savings to these online financial schemes.
-
Sanctioning Perpetrators: Section 7 requires the President to impose applicable sanctions on specific foreign persons and entities, such as the Prince Group Holding Company and Huione Group, that are responsible for directing online financial scams against United States nationals. This accountability aims to crack down on the criminals stealing billions of dollars from the American people.
Potential Negative Impacts for People
- Potential for Sanction Waivers: Section 7(b) allows the President to waive the imposition of sanctions on listed foreign persons if it is determined to be vital to the national security interests of the United States. This could be seen as a negative loophole that lets specific wrongdoers escape accountability if a waiver is granted.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Tap or hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Would immigrants be better off under this? — Provides support and reintegration services for trafficking victims forced into scam centers. Would retired people be better off under this? — Retirees are primary targets of the financial scams the bill intends to dismantle. Would people over 65 be better off under this? — Seniors are frequently targeted by 'pig butchering' and other online financial scams. Would billionaires be better off under this? — Protects high-value assets from cryptocurrency and investment scams. Would high-income households be better off under this? — Protects household savings from transnational financial crimes. Would people with substantial wealth be better off under this? — Protects high-value assets from cryptocurrency and investment scams. Would middle-income households be better off under this? — Protects household savings from transnational financial crimes. Would the very wealthiest people be better off under this? — Protects high-value assets from cryptocurrency and investment scams.
- National Security And Foreign Policy
- Does this strengthen ties with allied countries? — Mandates coordination with allies and partners to combat transnational crime. Does this better protect the country from computer attacks? — Uses offensive cyber capabilities and interagency coordination to degrade scam operations. Does this favour talking over confrontation abroad? — Pressure is applied to complicit foreign governments to cooperate in dismantling scam centers. Does this send more money or help to other countries? — Provides funding for trauma-informed care and shelter for trafficking victims abroad.
- Economy And Finance
- Does this give people more protection from unfair business practices? — The bill aims to protect U.S. citizens from mass online financial scams and recover stolen assets.
- Education And Technology
- Does this put more rules on large technology companies? — Requires partnerships and coordination with social media and tech platforms to disrupt scams.
- Healthcare
- Does this make mental health care easier to get? — Authorizes trauma-informed care for victims of trafficking in scam centers.
- Social Issues And Justice
- Is this likely to lift people out of poverty? — Efforts to recover stolen life savings can prevent financial ruin for victims.
- Governance And Ideology
- Does this give the federal government more power? — Establishes a new interagency Task Force with broad coordination powers. Does this protect the right to fair treatment by the courts? — The broad authority for sanctions based on 'credible evidence' could potentially lead to misidentification.
- 10/29/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 9/28/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 9/16/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 8/31/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 8/20/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 7/21/2026
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 7/13/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 6/25/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 6/22/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 5/19/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 5/13/2026
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 5/12/2026
- 5 Cosponsors added.
- 4/29/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 4/27/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 4/21/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 4/14/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 4/13/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 4/6/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 3/26/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 3/25/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 3/24/2026
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 3/5/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 3/4/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 3/3/2026
- 4 Cosponsors added.
- 2/25/2026
- 3 Cosponsors added.
- 2/24/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 2/23/2026
- 4 Cosponsors added.
- 2/20/2026
- 3 Cosponsors added.
- 1/8/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 12/18/2025
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 12/15/2025
- 3 Cosponsors added.
- 12/12/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 12/11/2025
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 12/10/2025
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 12/9/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 12/3/2025
- Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held
- Ordered to be Reported in the Nature of a Substitute (Amended) by the Yeas and Nays: 48 - 0.
- 5 Cosponsors added.
- 12/2/2025
- 3 Cosponsors added.
- 11/25/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 11/20/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 11/18/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 11/17/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 11/4/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 10/28/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 9/18/2025
- Referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs, and in addition to the Committee on the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- Introduced in House
Mark AmodeiRepublican · Nevada
Gabe AmoDemocrat · Rhode Island
Gus BilirakisRepublican · Florida
Mike BostRepublican · Illinois
Michael BaumgartnerRepublican · Washington
Sheri BiggsRepublican · South Carolina
André CarsonDemocrat · Indiana
Joaquin CastroDemocrat · Texas
Ben ClineRepublican · Virginia
Donald DavisDemocrat · North Carolina
Warren DavidsonRepublican · Ohio
Troy DowningRepublican · Montana
Brian FitzpatrickRepublican · Pennsylvania
Russell FryRepublican · South Carolina
Vince FongRepublican · California
Josh GottheimerDemocrat · New Jersey
Craig GoldmanRepublican · Texas
Laura GillenDemocrat · New York
Bill HuizengaRepublican · Michigan
Josh HarderDemocrat · California
Mike HaridopolosRepublican · Florida
Jonathan JacksonDemocrat · Illinois
Raja KrishnamoorthiDemocrat · Illinois
Young KimRepublican · California
Thomas KeanRepublican · New Jersey
Sydney Kamlager-DoveDemocrat · California
Timothy KennedyDemocrat · New York
Frank LucasRepublican · Oklahoma
Darin LaHoodRepublican · Illinois
Susie LeeDemocrat · Nevada
Michael LawlerRepublican · New York
George LatimerDemocrat · New York
James McGovernDemocrat · Massachusetts
John MoolenaarRepublican · Michigan
Seth MoultonDemocrat · Massachusetts
Daniel MeuserRepublican · Pennsylvania
James MoylanRepublican · Guam
Max MillerRepublican · Ohio
Nathaniel MoranRepublican · Texas
Ryan MackenzieRepublican · Pennsylvania
Mark MessmerRepublican · Indiana
Tim MooreRepublican · North Carolina
Kristen McDonald RivetDemocrat · Michigan
Sarah McBrideDemocrat · Delaware
Addison McDowellRepublican · North Carolina
Eleanor NortonDemocrat · District of Columbia
Johnny OlszewskiDemocrat · Maryland
August PflugerRepublican · Texas
Ayanna PressleyDemocrat · Massachusetts
John RutherfordRepublican · Florida
Michael RulliRepublican · Ohio
Josh RileyDemocrat · New York
Brad ShermanDemocrat · California
Christopher SmithRepublican · New Jersey
Janice SchakowskyDemocrat · Illinois
Elise StefanikRepublican · New York
Thomas SuozziDemocrat · New York
Pete StauberRepublican · Minnesota
Bryan SteilRepublican · Wisconsin
Shri ThanedarDemocrat · Michigan
Derek TranDemocrat · California
David ValadaoRepublican · California
Jefferson Van DrewRepublican · New Jersey
Derrick Van OrdenRepublican · Wisconsin
Eugene VindmanDemocrat · Virginia
Matt Van EppsRepublican · Tennessee
Joe WilsonRepublican · South Carolina
Debbie Wasserman SchultzDemocrat · Florida
Robert WittmanRepublican · Virginia
Ann WagnerRepublican · Missouri
Roger WilliamsRepublican · Texas
George WhitesidesDemocrat · California
Rudy YakymRepublican · Indiana