Mike Bost (R-IL)
Agricultural and Rural Road Improvement Program Act
A Republican bill with 4 Democratic cosponsors · See all 17 cosponsors
Last activity — Referred to the Subcommittee on Highways and Transit.
In committee
Introduced and handed to a committee in the chamber it started in.
The committee holds it, and most bills are never heard from again. A hearing or a committee vote would be news; silence is the usual outcome, and it kills the bill without anyone voting against it.
Its path through Congress
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
This bill, called the "Agricultural and Rural Road Improvement Program Act," aims to improve roads in agricultural and rural areas. It sets up a program to fix roads and bridges that farmers and rural communities use. The goal is to make it easier and safer to move agricultural products and support the rural economy.
Yes· 3 of 16
- Scored +8
Would farmers be better off under this?
The bill directly benefits farmers by improving roads and bridges necessary for transporting agricultural products.
- Scored +7
Does this repair or build roads and bridges?
The bill directly aims to improve roads and bridges, especially in rural and agricultural areas.
- Scored +6
Would business owners be better off under this?
The bill improves first- and last-mile access to farms, facilities, and businesses.
The opposite
- Scored -2
Does this cut the pollution that drives climate change?
The bill could reduce funding for the carbon reduction program
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Improved Access to Farms and Facilities (Sec. 2(a)(1), (b)(2)): This could make it easier for farmers to get their products to market and for businesses to supply them, potentially boosting the rural economy and providing more job opportunities.
-
Reduced Weight-Limited Bridges and Capacity-Limited Roads (Sec. 2(a)(2), (b)(1)): Replacing or fixing these bridges and roads can allow for heavier loads, reducing transportation costs for farmers and businesses.
-
Improved Safety and Efficiency (Sec. 2(a)(3), (b)(4)): Making roads safer and more efficient helps everyone who uses them.
Potential Negative Impacts for People
- Reduced Funding for Carbon Reduction Program (Sec. 3(b)): This bill changes how money is given out, which might mean less money for the Carbon Reduction Program.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Tap or hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Would farmers be better off under this? — The bill directly benefits farmers by improving roads and bridges necessary for transporting agricultural products. Would business owners be better off under this? — The bill improves first- and last-mile access to farms, facilities, and businesses. Would people in rural areas be better off under this? — The bill focuses on improving roads and bridges in rural areas, directly benefiting rural residents. Would households on low incomes be better off under this? — Improved infrastructure and access to markets can potentially create job opportunities and reduce transportation costs in rural areas, benefiting low-income households. Would middle-income households be better off under this? — The bill could lead to job creation and economic growth in rural areas, benefiting middle-class households. Would people in middle age be better off under this? — Improved infrastructure could lead to better job opportunities and business prospects. Would people in their twenties and thirties be better off under this? — Increased job opportunities in rural areas could benefit young adults. Would children be better off under this? — Safer roads could improve safety for children in rural areas. Would retired people be better off under this? — Improved roads and bridges can make transportation safer and more accessible for retirees living in rural areas. Would people over 65 be better off under this? — Safer and more accessible roads could improve the quality of life for seniors in rural communities. Would high-income households be better off under this? — The improvement of rural infrastructure could provide minor benefits to high income households through improved business prospects.
- Economy And Finance
- Does this make it easier to run a small business? — Improved roads and bridges would make it easier for small businesses in rural areas to transport goods and services, supporting their operations. Is this likely to grow the economy? — Improved infrastructure in rural areas could lead to increased economic activity and growth. Is this likely to create jobs? — The bill could lead to increased job creation in construction and related industries due to road and bridge repair projects.
- Environment Energy And Infrastructure
- Does this repair or build roads and bridges? — The bill directly aims to improve roads and bridges, especially in rural and agricultural areas. Does this invest in rural communities? — By improving infrastructure, the bill supports rural development and economic opportunities. Does this cut the pollution that drives climate change? — The bill could reduce funding for the carbon reduction program
- 1/30/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 12/16/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 12/15/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 12/2/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 11/20/2025
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 11/18/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 10/6/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 10/3/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 9/9/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 9/4/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 8/19/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 7/23/2025
- Referred to the Subcommittee on Highways and Transit.
- 7/22/2025
- Referred to the House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure.
- 5 Cosponsors added.
- Introduced in House
Scott DesJarlaisRepublican · Tennessee
Randy FeenstraRepublican · Iowa
Brad FinstadRepublican · Minnesota
Adam GrayDemocrat · California
Harriet HagemanRepublican · Wyoming
Jeff HurdRepublican · Colorado
Frank LucasRepublican · Oklahoma
Tracey MannRepublican · Kansas
Mary MillerRepublican · Illinois
April McClain DelaneyDemocrat · Maryland
Troy NehlsRepublican · Texas
Robert OnderRepublican · Missouri
Josh RileyDemocrat · New York
David TaylorRepublican · Ohio
Derrick Van OrdenRepublican · Wisconsin
Gabe VasquezDemocrat · New Mexico
Tony WiedRepublican · Wisconsin