A Republican bill with 13 Republican cosponsors · See all 13 cosponsors
Last activity — Referred to the Committee on Education and Workforce, and in addition to the Committee on the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
In committee
Introduced and handed to a committee in the chamber it started in.
The committee holds it, and most bills are never heard from again. A hearing or a committee vote would be news; silence is the usual outcome, and it kills the bill without anyone voting against it.
Its path through Congress
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
This bill, called the "Employee Rights Act", seeks to reform labor laws by modifying the National Labor Relations Act, the Labor Management Relations Act, the Labor-Management Reporting and Disclosure Act, and the Fair Labor Standards Act. The proposed changes include requiring secret ballot elections for collective bargaining, restricting voting rights for employees without lawful immigration status, protecting employee privacy regarding personal information, and redefining the criteria for determining employee status. It also addresses tribal sovereignty, independent negotiating, diversity initiatives, union violence, and unlawful harassment.
Yes· 3 of 4
- Scored +2
Would business owners be better off under this?
The bill includes provisions that could reduce employer liability and increase flexibility.
- Scored +2
Does this protect people from being watched or searched?
The bill includes provisions to enhance employee privacy regarding their personal information.
- Scored +2
Does this give people more control over their personal data?
Employee privacy measures regarding personal information and union activities are a positive.
The opposite· 3 of 12
- Scored -5
Would immigrants be better off under this?
Excluding undocumented workers from union representation and voting is a significant negative.
- Scored -5
Would union members be better off under this?
Overall, the bill weakens union power and collective bargaining rights.
- Scored -3
Would households on low incomes be better off under this?
Redefining employee status could lead to fewer benefits for low-income workers.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Enhanced Employee Rights for Lawful Workers (Section 2): Requiring secret ballot elections for selecting collective bargaining representatives could be viewed as a positive step, ensuring that the selection process is more democratic and reflects the true will of the employees.
-
Employee Privacy (Section 4): Provisions protecting the personal information of employees during organizing drives and restricting the use of such information could be seen as a positive for individual privacy rights. Specifically, Section 4(a) requires employers to provide a voter list to a labor organization that petitioned to represent such employees. Section 4(c) ensures that no employee's labor organization dues can be used for nonrepresentational activities without written consent.
-
Freedom from Union Violence Act (Section 9): Amending Section 1951 of title 18, United States Code, seeks to address violence related to labor disputes, and could protect individuals from threats or physical harm.
-
Unlawful Harassment (Section 10): This section allows employers to take action against discriminatory, harassing, or demeaning language or conduct, which can create a safer and more respectful work environment.
Potential Negative Impacts for People
-
Union Voting for Employees Who Do Not Have Lawful Status (Section 3): Excluding employees without lawful immigration status from voting in union elections or being considered for representation could negatively impact these workers by limiting their ability to collectively bargain for better wages and working conditions.
-
Employment Relationships (Section 5): Redefining the criteria for determining employee status under the Fair Labor Standards Act could lead to more workers being classified as independent contractors, potentially denying them benefits and protections afforded to employees. Section 5(c) changes the terms of who can be considered a joint employer, making it more difficult to hold multiple entities accountable for labor violations.
-
Independent Negotiating (Section 7): Allowing individual employees to engage in independent negotiating in covered states could undermine the collective bargaining power of unions and potentially create disparities in wages and working conditions among employees within the same unit.
-
Diversity, Equity, or Inclusion (Section 8): Restricting the inclusion of diversity, equity, or inclusion initiatives in collective bargaining agreements, unless required by law, could limit efforts to address workplace inequality and promote a more inclusive environment.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Tap or hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Would business owners be better off under this? — The bill includes provisions that could reduce employer liability and increase flexibility. Would immigrants be better off under this? — Excluding undocumented workers from union representation and voting is a significant negative. Would union members be better off under this? — Overall, the bill weakens union power and collective bargaining rights. Would households on low incomes be better off under this? — Redefining employee status could lead to fewer benefits for low-income workers. Would Black Americans be better off under this? — Restrictions on diversity initiatives may have a slightly negative impact. Would Asian Americans be better off under this? — Restrictions on diversity initiatives may have a slightly negative impact. Would Hispanic Americans be better off under this? — Restrictions on diversity initiatives may have a slightly negative impact. Would middle-income households be better off under this? — Some provisions may weaken union power, potentially affecting middle-class union workers. Would women be better off under this? — Restrictions on diversity initiatives may have a slightly negative impact.
- Social Issues And Justice
- Does this make it easier for immigrants already here to become citizens? — Excluding undocumented workers from union representation hinders their ability to advocate for better conditions. Does this narrow the gap between how men and women are treated? — Restrictions on diversity initiatives could negatively impact gender equality efforts. Does this narrow racial gaps in how people are treated? — Restrictions on diversity initiatives could negatively impact racial equity efforts.
- Economy And Finance
- Does this strengthen the rights of workers to organise? — Several provisions weaken union power and protections, like independent negotiating and restrictions on diversity initiatives.
- Governance And Ideology
- Does this protect people from being watched or searched? — The bill includes provisions to enhance employee privacy regarding their personal information. Does this make elections run better? — Requiring secret ballot elections for union representation could be viewed as a slight improvement to the democratic process.
- Education And Technology
- Does this give people more control over their personal data? — Employee privacy measures regarding personal information and union activities are a positive.
- 9/16/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 9/8/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 9/2/2025
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 7/15/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 6/26/2025
- Referred to the Committee on Education and Workforce, and in addition to the Committee on the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
- 8 Cosponsors added.
- Introduced in House
5 bills Congress.gov lists as related to this one — companions in the other chamber, earlier versions, and bills this one absorbed or was folded into.
Aaron BeanRepublican · Florida
Earl CarterRepublican · Georgia
Mark HarrisRepublican · North Carolina
Brian JackRepublican · Georgia
Julia LetlowRepublican · Louisiana
John MoolenaarRepublican · Michigan
Ralph NormanRepublican · South Carolina
Robert OnderRepublican · Missouri
Scott PerryRepublican · Pennsylvania
David RouzerRepublican · North Carolina
John RoseRepublican · Tennessee
Marlin StutzmanRepublican · Indiana
Joe WilsonRepublican · South Carolina