Aaron Bean (R-FL)

Apples to Apples Comparison Act of 2025

H.R. 4093 · House bill Health

A Republican bill with 25 Republican cosponsors · See all 25 cosponsors

Last activity — Ordered to be Reported in the Nature of a Substitute by the Yeas and Nays: 25 - 15.

Introduced, nothing more yet

Formally proposed, and not yet handed to a committee.

Nearly every bill is sent to a committee within days. Introduction alone is not a sign of support, of momentum, or of any likelihood of passing — any member may introduce any bill.

Its path through Congress

  1. Introduced

What this bill would do

This bill requires the Secretary of Health and Human Services to publish detailed information regarding Medicare expenditures on the public website of the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. Beginning in 2025, this data must be provided in machine-readable files and broken down by county, Metropolitan Statistical Area, and specific categories of individuals. It also mandates that the Medicare Payment Advisory Commission include a retrospective analysis comparing average expenditures for Medicare Advantage plans versus traditional fee-for-service Medicare in its annual reports starting in 2026. Additionally, the bill requires the public release of the methodology used for these analyses and allows for a public comment period. Finally, the Boards of Trustees of the trust funds must jointly include specific aggregate and average expenditure information for certain categories of individuals in their annual reports starting in 2026.

Yes· 3 of 7

  • Scored +3

    Does this make what the government does easier for the public to see?

    The bill mandates the publication of detailed Medicare expenditure data to the public website.

  • Scored +2

    Would people over 65 be better off under this?

    Enhanced transparency regarding Medicare Advantage and fee-for-service benefits directly impacts seniors.

  • Scored +2

    Would retired people be better off under this?

    Increased transparency in Medicare comparative analysis is highly relevant to retirees.

The opposite

No question was scored the opposite.