Brad Knott (R-NC)
Tren de Aragua Border Security Threat Assessment Act
A Republican bill with 31 Republican cosponsors · See all 31 cosponsors
Last activity — Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.
In the other chamber's committee
Passed one chamber and has been handed to a committee in the other.
The committee decides whether it goes any further, and most bills that reach a committee never leave it. A committee that simply does nothing kills a bill without anyone ever voting against it, so no news from here is usually the news.
Its path through Congress
- Introduced
- Passed House voice vote
- In Senate committee
The House by voice vote (members called out yes or no together): no member's position on it was recorded.
What this bill would do
This Act, known as the ``Tren de Aragua Border Security Threat Assessment Act'', requires the Secretary of Homeland Security to conduct a specific investigation. The Secretary must submit a border threat assessment regarding Tren de Aragua to congressional committees within 180 days. This assessment must identify criminal threats, origins, strategic aims, tactical methods, funding, and leadership of the group. Additionally, the Secretary must develop a strategic plan to counter these identified threats within one year of the assessment. This plan must include efforts to locate, detect, interdict, and disrupt such organizations.
Yes· 3 of 4
- Scored +5
Does this tighten control of the border?
The bill enhances border security through required threat assessments and strategic plans to disrupt transnational criminal organizations.
- Scored +3
Does this put more money into stopping terrorism?
The bill directs resources toward identifying and disrupting the strategic aims and tactical methods of criminal organizations.
- Scored +2
Does this give the federal government more power?
The bill expands federal intelligence and strategic planning functions regarding border threats.
The opposite
- Scored -3
Would immigrants be better off under this?
The bill focuses on disrupting and interdicting specific criminal organizations often associated with migratory flows.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Increased Intelligence on Criminal Threats: The bill requires the Secretary of Homeland Security to identify current and potential criminal threats posed by members or affiliates of Tren de Aragua regarding unlawful entry or security vulnerabilities (Section 2(a)(2)(A)).
-
Improved Information Sharing: The required Strategic Plan includes efforts to analyze and share border security and threat information between Federal departments and agencies, as well as with state, local, Tribal, and territorial law enforcement agencies (Section 2(b)(2)(B)).
-
Disruption of Criminal Organizations: The Strategic Plan must include efforts to locate, detect, interdict, and disrupt transnational criminal organizations like Tren de Aragua (Section 2(b)(2)(C)).
-
Prevention of Criminal Proliferation: The act mandates that the strategic plan consider efforts to prevent transnational criminal organizations from proliferating within the United States (Section 2(b)(2)(D)).
Potential Negative Impacts for People
- No negative impacts are explicitly stated in the provided text.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Tap or hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Social Issues And Justice
- Does this tighten control of the border? — The bill enhances border security through required threat assessments and strategic plans to disrupt transnational criminal organizations.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Would immigrants be better off under this? — The bill focuses on disrupting and interdicting specific criminal organizations often associated with migratory flows.
- Governance And Ideology
- Does this give the federal government more power? — The bill expands federal intelligence and strategic planning functions regarding border threats. Does this make what the government does easier for the public to see? — The bill requires public reporting of a threat assessment to congressional committees.
- National Security And Foreign Policy
- Does this put more money into stopping terrorism? — The bill directs resources toward identifying and disrupting the strategic aims and tactical methods of criminal organizations.
- 11/20/2025
- Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.
- 11/19/2025
- Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
- Passed/agreed to in House: On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill Agreed to by voice vote. (text: CR H4787)
- On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill Agreed to by voice vote. (text: CR H4787)
- DEBATE - The House proceeded with forty minutes of debate on H.R. 4070.
- Considered under suspension of the rules. (consideration: CR H4786-4788)
- Mr. Guest moved to suspend the rules and pass the bill.
- 9/26/2025
- Reported by the Committee on Homeland Security. H. Rept. 119-313.
- Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 267.
- 8/29/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 7/23/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 7/21/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 7/15/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 7/7/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 7/2/2025
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 6/27/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 6/25/2025
- Subcommittee on Border Security and Enforcement Discharged
- Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held
- Ordered to be Reported by Voice Vote.
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 6/24/2025
- 7 Cosponsors added.
- 6/23/2025
- Referred to the House Committee on Homeland Security.
- Referred to the Subcommittee on Border Security and Enforcement.
- 14 Cosponsors added.
- Introduced in House
Don BaconRepublican · Nebraska
Josh BrecheenRepublican · Oklahoma
Sheri BiggsRepublican · South Carolina
Dan CrenshawRepublican · Texas
Elijah CraneRepublican · Arizona
Gabe EvansRepublican · Colorado
Russell FryRepublican · South Carolina
Mark GreenRepublican · Tennessee
Michael GuestRepublican · Mississippi
Carlos GimenezRepublican · Florida
Tony GonzalesRepublican · Texas
Marjorie GreeneRepublican · Georgia
Andrew GarbarinoRepublican · New York
Craig GoldmanRepublican · Texas
Bill HuizengaRepublican · Michigan
Clay HigginsRepublican · Louisiana
Abraham HamadehRepublican · Arizona
Michael LawlerRepublican · New York
Morgan LuttrellRepublican · Texas
Michael McCaulRepublican · Texas
Ryan MackenzieRepublican · Pennsylvania
Tim MooreRepublican · North Carolina
John McGuireRepublican · Virginia
Addison McDowellRepublican · North Carolina
Andrew OglesRepublican · Tennessee
August PflugerRepublican · Texas
Gary PalmerRepublican · Alabama
W. SteubeRepublican · Florida
Dale StrongRepublican · Alabama
Joe WilsonRepublican · South Carolina
Tim WalbergRepublican · Michigan