Barry Moore (R-AL)

STOP CSAM Act of 2025

H.R. 3921 · House bill Crime and Law Enforcement

A Republican bill with 11 Democratic cosponsors · See all 30 cosponsors

Last activity — Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.

In committee

Introduced and handed to a committee in the chamber it started in.

The committee holds it, and most bills are never heard from again. A hearing or a committee vote would be news; silence is the usual outcome, and it kills the bill without anyone voting against it.

Its path through Congress

  1. Introduced
  2. In Committee

What this bill would do

The STOP CSAM Act of 2025 aims to combat the sexual exploitation of children by increasing accountability for the tech industry. It updates federal laws to expand protections for child victims and witnesses in court proceedings, including clearer definitions of psychological abuse and exploitation. The bill mandates stricter reporting requirements for digital service providers to the NCMEC CyberTipline. It also establishes significant civil and criminal penalties for providers that fail to meet these obligations. Additionally, the act expands civil remedies, allowing victims to sue for damages against certain platforms and app stores. Finally, it includes provisions to facilitate the payment of restitution to victims.

Yes· 3 of 6

  • Scored +10

    Would children be better off under this?

    The bill significantly enhances the safety, privacy, and legal recourse for children victims of exploitation.

  • Scored +8

    Does this put more rules on large technology companies?

    The bill imposes stricter reporting, transparency, and legal liability requirements on large technology and social media providers.

  • Scored +6

    Does this give people more control over their personal data?

    The bill enhances the protection of sensitive personal information for child victims in judicial proceedings.

The opposite

  • Scored -5

    Would business owners be better off under this?

    Tech industry business owners face increased regulatory burdens and potential civil/criminal liabilities.

  • Scored -2

    Does this protect the individual right to speak freely?

    Increased liability and reporting requirements may have a chilling effect on digital expression.