The paragraph under each bill and the scores beside it were written by an AI model from the bill's text; the rest is the record.
In committee 16 bills
Introduced and handed to a committee in the chamber it started in.
What happens next: The committee holds it, and most bills are never heard from again. A hearing or a committee vote would be news; silence is the usual outcome, and it kills the bill without anyone voting against it.
Now: handed to a committee to examine — Committee on Ways and Means, and in addition to the Committees on Agriculture, Energy and Commerce, and Education and Workforce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned · Aug 3
This bill aims to eliminate asset limits used by various federally funded, means-tested public assistance programs.
Yes· 2 of 6
Scored +8
Would households on low incomes be better off under this?
The removal of asset limits allows low-income families to save and access assistance more easily.
Scored +7
Is this likely to lift people out of poverty?
Eliminating asset limits for TANF, SNAP, and LIHEAP helps low-income families build savings and reduces their dependence on public assistance.
A Democratic resolution with 17 Democratic cosponsors.
Introduced in the House
Now: handed to a committee to examine — Committee on Ways and Means · Mar 3
This resolution is an inquiry that requests information from the President and directs the Secretaries of the Treasury and Homeland Security to provide documents to the House of Representatives.
Yes· 2 of 3
Scored +5
Does this make what the government does easier for the public to see?
The resolution seeks to increase transparency regarding the exchange of taxpayer information between federal agencies.
Scored +4
Does this protect people from being watched or searched?
The oversight mechanism is designed to protect taxpayer privacy by monitoring potential unauthorized disclosures.
A Democratic resolution with 2 Republican cosponsors.
Introduced in the House
Now: handed to a committee to examine — Committee on Oversight and Government Reform · Jan 13
This resolution supports the goals and ideals of Korean American Day. It recognizes the arrival of the first wave of 102 Korean immigrants on January 13, 1903.
Yes· 2 of 6
Scored +5
Would Asian Americans be better off under this?
The resolution specifically honors the history and contributions of the Korean American community.
Scored +3
Would immigrants be better off under this?
The resolution recognizes the historical journey and contributions of Korean immigrants to the United States.
Now: handed to a committee to examine — Committee on Foreign Affairs, and in addition to the Committee on Armed Services, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned · Jan 12
This bill aims to restrict how Federal money is used regarding Greenland. It prohibits the use of Federal funds to support an invasion, annexation, or purchase of Greenland by the United States or its officials.
The opposite· 2 of 3
Scored -3
Does this send more money or help to other countries?
The bill prevents increasing United States funding or assistance for Greenland beyond current levels.
Scored -2
Does this reduce what the federal government spends?
The bill limits the ability of the federal government to increase financial investment or assistance in Greenland.
Now: handed to a committee to examine — Committee on Ways and Means · Sep 16
This bill aims to set aside specific funds for Indian populations.
Yes· 2 of 6
Scored +8
Would Native Americans be better off under this?
The bill mandates a 15 percent fund set-aside and a guarantee of at least 10 grants specifically for Indian tribes and organizations.
Scored +7
Does this make health care easier to get in general?
The bill reserves 15 percent of health profession opportunity grant funds specifically for Indian tribes, organizations, and Tribal Colleges to support healthcare careers.
Now: handed to a committee to examine — Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committee on Armed Services, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned · Jul 25
This bill aims to stop the use of specific unmanned aircraft vehicles for surveillance of people in the United States who are participating in protests or civil disobedience.
Yes
Scored +7
Does this make what the government does easier for the public to see?
The bill mandates annual reports to Congress detailing unauthorized or novel uses of covered drones, including details on surveillance of U.S. persons.
Scored +7
Does this protect people from being watched or searched?
The bill enhances privacy by prohibiting the surveillance of individuals participating in protests or civil disobedience via high-altitude drones.
The opposite
Scored -5
Does this give the government more power to monitor people inside the country?
The bill acts to decrease domestic surveillance capabilities of military-developed unmanned aircraft vehicles.
Scored -2
Does this reduce what the federal government spends?
The bill restricts the use of funds for specific drone surveillance activities, which may slightly reduce the budget for those specific operations.
Now: handed to a committee to examine — Committee on Ways and Means, and in addition to the Committee on Foreign Affairs, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned · Jul 23
This bill aims to stop the President from imposing certain duties on baby clothing items. It specifically prohibits the use of the International Emergency Economic Powers Act to tax these goods.
Yes· 2 of 7
Scored +3
Is this likely to lower the prices of everyday things people buy?
The bill lowers the cost of baby clothing and accessories by prohibiting and terminating specific import duties.
Scored +3
Does this cut taxes for middle-income families?
The bill reduces costs for families by terminating duties on various baby clothing items.
The opposite
Scored -2
Does this leave more decisions to the states?
The bill limits the President's unilateral authority to impose duties under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act.
Scored -1
Does this reduce what the federal government spends?
The bill reduces federal revenue by prohibiting and terminating the collection of duties on baby clothing.
