The paragraph under each bill and the scores beside it were written by an AI model from the bill's text; the rest is the record.
In committee 32 bills
Introduced and handed to a committee in the chamber it started in.
What happens next: The committee holds it, and most bills are never heard from again. A hearing or a committee vote would be news; silence is the usual outcome, and it kills the bill without anyone voting against it.
Now: handed to a committee to examine — Committee on Education and Workforce · Oct 1
This bill amends the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 to make certain mandatory or coerced clauses unenforceable.
Yes· 2 of 8
Scored +6
Would retired people be better off under this?
Retirees are directly protected by rules making mandatory predispute arbitration clauses and discretionary benefit determinations unenforceable.
Scored +6
Does this protect the right to fair treatment by the courts?
The bill enhances due process by invalidating mandatory arbitration clauses and class action waivers, ensuring plan participants can seek fair court review of benefit claims.
H.R. 10546 Civil Rights and Liberties, Minority Issues
A Democratic bill with 1 Democratic cosponsor.
Introduced in the House
Now: handed to a committee to examine — Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committees on Education and Workforce, and Armed Services, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned · Sep 24
This bill establishes a commission to review historical injustices and instances where a federal agency unjustly discriminated against certain protected groups and members of the uniformed services.
Yes· 2 of 14
Scored +7
Does this narrow racial gaps in how people are treated?
The bill establishes a commission to review historical injustices and federal agency discrimination against protected groups.
Scored +6
Would Black Americans be better off under this?
The bill provides a formal mechanism to review and address historical injustices and civil rights violations affecting protected groups.
Now: handed to a committee to examine — Committee on Education and Workforce · Sep 2
This bill aims to amend the Child Nutrition Act of 1966. It requires specific training for personnel regarding food allergy identification and response.
Yes· 2 of 12
Scored +8
Would children be better off under this?
The bill directly improves safety and nutritional information for children with food allergies.
Scored +6
Would students be better off under this?
The bill improves safety and nutritional management for students with food allergies.
Now: handed to a committee to examine — Committee on Education and Workforce · Sep 1
This bill aims to amend the Higher Education Act of 1965 to increase accessibility and completion rates for postsecondary students, particularly those with disabilities.
Yes· 2 of 8
Scored +10
Would people with disabilities be better off under this?
The bill provides significant new supports, resources, and mandates to ensure academic success and inclusion for students with disabilities.
Scored +10
Does this expand the rights of people with disabilities?
The bill significantly enhances rights through mandated accessibility offices, inclusive higher education programs, and standardized instructional guidelines.
Now: handed to a committee to examine — Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned · Aug 13
This bill aims to amend the Social Security Act to include coverage for cancer care planning and coordination under Medicare.
Yes· 2 of 11
Scored +8
Would people over 65 be better off under this?
The bill directly benefits Medicare beneficiaries, the majority of whom are seniors, by improving cancer care coordination.
Scored +8
Would retired people be better off under this?
The bill provides essential care coordination benefits to Medicare beneficiaries, many of whom are retirees.
Now: handed to a committee to examine — Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure · Aug 3
This bill seeks to amend title 49 of the United States Code. It aims to provide grants to state and local governments to develop value capture mechanisms and improve public transportation.
Yes· 2 of 20
Scored +8
Does this cut the pollution that drives climate change?
The bill explicitly aims to reduce CO2 emissions through increased transit capacity and ridership.
Scored +8
Does this improve buses, trains and other public transport?
The primary purpose of the bill is to improve public transportation and mobility.
