The paragraph under each bill and the scores beside it were written by an AI model from the bill's text; the rest is the record.
In committee 17 bills
Introduced and handed to a committee in the chamber it started in.
What happens next: The committee holds it, and most bills are never heard from again. A hearing or a committee vote would be news; silence is the usual outcome, and it kills the bill without anyone voting against it.
Now: handed to a committee to examine — Committee on Natural Resources, and in addition to the Committee on Agriculture, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned · Oct 9
This bill amends the Marine Mammal Protection Act of 1972 and the Animal Welfare Act.
Yes
Scored +6
Does this better protect air, water and wildlife?
The legislation enhances protections for specific marine mammals by prohibiting their capture, importation, exportation, and breeding for public display.
The opposite
Scored -4
Would business owners be better off under this?
Businesses relying on the public display and breeding of covered cetaceans face operational restrictions.
Scored -3
Does this make it easier to run a small business?
The bill restricts certain marine entertainment operations by banning the breeding and acquisition of specific cetaceans for public display.
Now: handed to a committee to examine — Committee on Appropriations · Jul 16
This bill provides significant appropriations to the Internal Revenue Service. The funds are designated for tax enforcement, taxpayer services, technology overhauls, and business systems modernization.
Yes· 2 of 8
Scored +5
Does this raise the taxes companies pay?
The bill targets large corporations for increased auditing and enforcement to ensure tax compliance.
Scored +5
Does this raise taxes on the highest earners?
The bill focuses on shifting enforcement assets toward high-income individuals to collect owed taxes.
The opposite· 2 of 6
Scored -5
Would billionaires be better off under this?
The enforcement plan focuses on high-income individuals and large corporations.
Scored -5
Would high-income households be better off under this?
The bill specifically targets high-income individuals for increased auditing and enforcement.
Now: handed to a committee to examine — Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned · Jun 29
This bill seeks to change how kidney disease education is covered under Medicare and private health insurance.
Yes· 2 of 24
Scored +9
Would people over 65 be better off under this?
Seniors are a primary demographic for Medicare and the most likely to suffer from kidney disease.
Scored +9
Would retired people be better off under this?
Retirees using Medicare benefit directly from expanded eligibility and provider options.
The opposite· 2 of 3
Scored -1
Does this reduce what the federal government spends?
Expanding eligible patients and providers under Medicare increases government healthcare spending.
Scored -1
Does this reduce what the federal government owes?
Increased Medicare coverage and spending on education services may slightly increase federal expenditures.
Now: handed to a committee to examine — Committee on Education and Workforce · Jun 3
This bill requires the Secretary of Labor to establish a pilot program called the Veterans Manufacturing Employment Program. Under this program, the Secretary will award competitive grants to three States.
Yes· 2 of 23
Scored +9
Would veterans be better off under this, taking everything together?
The bill is specifically designed to provide veterans with specialized training, apprenticeships, and sustainable manufacturing jobs.
Scored +7
Does this increase the pay, pensions or support veterans receive?
The bill creates a dedicated pilot program to fund training and employment opportunities specifically for veterans.
Now: handed to a committee to examine — Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned · Apr 14
This bill aims to amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act. The primary goal is to remove cost-sharing responsibilities for chronic care management services under Medicare Part B.
Yes· 2 of 20
Scored +10
Does this lower what people pay out of pocket for care, such as deductibles, copays and surprise bills?
The bill eliminates deductibles and cost-sharing for chronic care management services under Medicare Part B.
Scored +9
Would people over 65 be better off under this?
Seniors are the primary beneficiaries of Medicare and will see reduced costs for chronic care.
The opposite· 2 of 3
Scored -2
Does this make the government pay for what it commits to?
Increases government expenditure without an identified funding source.
Scored -2
Does this reduce what the federal government spends?
The government will cover 100% of these costs, increasing public expenditure.
Now: handed to a committee to examine — Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned · Mar 9
This bill seeks to amend the Public Health Service Act regarding the Living Organ Donation Reimbursement Program.
Yes· 2 of 8
Scored +5
Would households on low incomes be better off under this?
The bill prohibits grant recipients from limiting reimbursement eligibility based on income for those at or below 700 percent of the poverty line.
Scored +5
Does this make health care easier to get in general?
The bill expands reimbursement eligibility for living donors regardless of income if they are below 700% of the poverty line, making donation more feasible.
A Democratic resolution with 2 Republican cosponsors.
Introduced in the House
Now: handed to a committee to examine — Committee on Oversight and Government Reform · Feb 10
This resolution congratulates the Seattle Seahawks for winning Super Bowl LX. It highlights the team's 29-13 victory over the New England Patriots on February 8, 2026.
Yes
Scored +1
Would people in rural areas be better off under this?
The resolution highlights specific players from Yakima, a community in Washington State.
Scored +1
Would people in cities be better off under this?
The resolution celebrates a major sporting victory for a team based in a major metropolitan area.
A House committee approved it and sent it to the floor
This bill seeks to reauthorize the National Landslide Preparedness Act. It introduces new definitions for terms like "atmospheric river," "atmospheric river flooding event," and "extreme precipitation event."
Yes· 2 of 4
Scored +7
Would Native Americans be better off under this?
The bill expands the involvement and consideration of Indian tribes and Tribal organizations in landslide risk preparedness.
Scored +6
Does this improve help for people hit by a disaster?
The bill increases funding and expands scope for landslide early warning systems and risk management.
Now: handed to a committee to examine — Committee on Ways and Means, and in addition to the Committees on Energy and Commerce, and Foreign Affairs, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned · Dec 17
This bill creates a carbon intensity charge for certain domestic industrial facilities and imported primary and finished goods.
Yes· 2 of 25
Scored +9
Does this cut the pollution that drives climate change?
Imposes charges on high carbon intensity production and provides funding for decarbonization technology.
Scored +8
Does this put more money into wind, solar and other renewable power?
Provides grants and loans for advanced industrial technology designed to achieve net-zero carbon intensity.
The opposite· 2 of 5
Scored -5
Does this reduce what the federal government spends?
Appropriates significant funds for industrial grants, loans, and international assistance.
Scored -4
Is this likely to lower the price at the pump?
Carbon charges on petroleum extraction and refining may increase end-user energy costs.
