The paragraph under each bill and the scores beside it were written by an AI model from the bill's text; the rest is the record.
In committee 23 bills
Introduced and handed to a committee in the chamber it started in.
What happens next: The committee holds it, and most bills are never heard from again. A hearing or a committee vote would be news; silence is the usual outcome, and it kills the bill without anyone voting against it.
Now: handed to a committee to examine — Committee on the Judiciary · Sep 16
This bill focuses on improving how sexual assault evidence is processed across the country. The legislation directs the Attorney General to create a public online database tracking sexual assault kits and testing times.
Yes· 2 of 7
Scored +6
Would women be better off under this?
The legislation directly aids survivors of sexual assault, who are predominantly women, by improving tracking systems and decreasing evidence testing backlogs.
Scored +6
Does this make what the government does easier for the public to see?
The bill creates a publicly accessible online database tracking sexual assault kits and testing times, and mandates regular public reports on forensic science needs.
Now: handed to a committee to examine — Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned · Jul 22
This bill directs the Secretary of Health and Human Services to award grants to long-term care and post-acute care providers. These grants are intended to help providers develop and adopt health information technology.
Yes· 2 of 15
Scored +4
Would people over 65 be better off under this?
The bill focuses on improving technology for long-term and post-acute care providers who serve Medicare and Medicaid recipients, many of whom are seniors.
Scored +3
Does this reduce what the federal government spends?
The bill directs the evaluation of whether health information technology results in reduced Federal expenditures under Medicare and Medicaid.
Now: handed to a committee to examine — Committee on Energy and Commerce · May 29
This bill seeks to amend the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act. It proposes to include gluten-containing grain in the definition of a major food allergen.
Yes· 2 of 4
Scored +7
Does this give people more protection from unfair business practices?
The bill improves consumer safety by requiring more explicit labeling of gluten-containing grains as major food allergens.
Scored +5
Would people with disabilities be better off under this?
The bill assists people with dietary disabilities or medical conditions like celiac disease by improving allergen transparency.
Now: handed to a committee to examine — Committee on Financial Services · Apr 30
This joint resolution aims to express congressional disapproval of a rule submitted by the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection.
Yes
Scored +4
Would business owners be better off under this?
The disapproval of the rule reduces regulatory requirements for businesses engaged in contract-for-deed home sales.
The opposite· 2 of 5
Scored -5
Does this give people more protection from unfair business practices?
The resolution disapproves a rule intended to provide consumer protections for home sales financed under contracts for deed, thereby removing those protections.
Scored -3
Would households on low incomes be better off under this?
The removal of consumer protections for contract-for-deed arrangements primarily affects lower-income buyers who rely on such financing methods.
Now: handed to a committee to examine — Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned · Apr 15
This bill aims to amend the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980. The primary purpose is to provide for the consideration of climate change within the Superfund framework.
Yes· 2 of 20
Scored +8
Does this better protect air, water and wildlife?
It updates CERCLA to ensure ongoing safety and remedial actions remain protective against weather and climate risks.
Scored +6
Would households on low incomes be better off under this?
Low-income communities are disproportionately situated near hazardous waste sites and benefit significantly from enhanced protections.