Cindy Hyde-Smith (R-MS)

A resolution commending Mississippi Christian University for 200 years of service to the State of Mississippi and the United States.

S.Res. 825 · Senate resolution Education

A Republican resolution with 1 Republican cosponsor · See the cosponsor

Last activity — Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S4365; text: CR S4392-4393)

Adopted

The chamber formally agreed to it, and for a resolution that is the finish line: what it says is now officially the chamber's position, rule or tribute.

Nothing more is needed. A resolution is how a chamber speaks for itself or sets its own rules, so adopting it is what puts it into effect. It is not a law, so there is nothing for the President to sign.

Its path through Congress

  1. Introduced
  2. Officially Recorded
  3. Adopted by the Senate unanimous consent

A Senate resolution is the Senate speaking for itself: stating a position, honouring someone, or setting its own rules. Adopting it is the whole process. Once the Senate agrees to it, it is officially the Senate's word; it is not a law, so the House and the President have no part in it.

The Senate by unanimous consent (no one objected, so there was no vote): no senator's position on it was recorded.

What this bill would do

This resolution commends Mississippi Christian University on its bicentennial anniversary. The institution, originally established as Hampstead Academy in 1826, is being recognized for 200 years of service to Mississippi and the United States. The resolution notes the university's historical milestones, such as becoming a coeducational institution and establishing various schools. It also highlights the university's economic impact and its diverse academic and athletic offerings. Finally, the Senate expresses its recognition of the university's faith-based excellence and requests that a copy of the resolution be sent to university leadership.

Yes· 3 of 8

  • Scored +1

    Would people in their twenties and thirties be better off under this?

    The resolution notes scholarship opportunities for students.

  • Scored +1

    Would households on low incomes be better off under this?

    The establishment of scholarships can assist low-income students.

  • Scored +1

    Would women be better off under this?

    The resolution notes the university's history of being coeducational.

The opposite

No question was scored the opposite.