John Cornyn (R-TX)
A resolution commemorating June 19, 2026, as "Juneteenth National Independence Day" in recognition of June 19, 1865, the date on which news of the end of slavery reached the slaves in the Southwestern States.
A Republican resolution with 13 Democratic cosponsors · See all 22 cosponsors
Last activity — Resolution agreed to in Senate without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S4286)
Adopted
The chamber formally agreed to it, and for a resolution that is the finish line: what it says is now officially the chamber's position, rule or tribute.
Nothing more is needed. A resolution is how a chamber speaks for itself or sets its own rules, so adopting it is what puts it into effect. It is not a law, so there is nothing for the President to sign.
Its path through Congress
- Introduced
- Adopted by the Senate unanimous consent
A Senate resolution is the Senate speaking for itself: stating a position, honouring someone, or setting its own rules. Adopting it is the whole process. Once the Senate agrees to it, it is officially the Senate's word; it is not a law, so the House and the President have no part in it.
The Senate by unanimous consent (no one objected, so there was no vote): no senator's position on it was recorded.
What this bill would do
This resolution commemorates June 19, 2026, as "Juneteenth National Independence Day." It recognizes the date on which news of the end of slavery reached the enslaved people in the Southwestern States in 1865. The measure acknowledges the historical significance of this day to the United States. It also supports continued nationwide celebrations of the holiday. Finally, it recognizes the observance of the end of slavery as part of the nation's history and heritage.
Yes
- Scored +5
Would Black Americans be better off under this?
The measure honors the history of African American freedom and the significance of Juneteenth to the community.
- Scored +3
Does this narrow racial gaps in how people are treated?
The resolution recognizes the historical significance of the end of slavery and the importance of Juneteenth to African American history and heritage.
- Scored +1
Would white Americans be better off under this?
The resolution aims to provide all people of the United States with a better understanding of the nation's shared history.
The opposite
No question was scored the opposite.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Educational Opportunities: The resolution supports continued nationwide celebrations to provide an opportunity for the people of the United States to learn more about the past and better understand the experiences that have shaped the country. (Section 3)
-
Cultural Recognition: The resolution recognizes the historical significance of Juneteenth National Independence Day to the United States and acknowledges the observance of the end of slavery as part of the history and heritage of the country. (Sections 2 and 4)
Potential Negative Impacts for People
- No negative impacts are mentioned in the text.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Tap or hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Would Black Americans be better off under this? — The measure honors the history of African American freedom and the significance of Juneteenth to the community. Would white Americans be better off under this? — The resolution aims to provide all people of the United States with a better understanding of the nation's shared history.
- Social Issues And Justice
- Does this narrow racial gaps in how people are treated? — The resolution recognizes the historical significance of the end of slavery and the importance of Juneteenth to African American history and heritage.
- 7/27/2026
- Senate Committee on the Judiciary discharged by Unanimous Consent.
- Passed/agreed to in Senate: Resolution agreed to in Senate without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent.
- Resolution agreed to in Senate without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S4286)
- 7/23/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 6/18/2026
- Submitted in Senate
- Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary. (text: CR S2940)
- 21 Cosponsors added.
One bill Congress.gov lists as related to this one — companions in the other chamber, earlier versions, and bills this one absorbed or was folded into.
Marsha BlackburnRepublican · Tennessee
Richard BlumenthalDemocrat · Connecticut
Cory BookerDemocrat · New Jersey
Katie BrittRepublican · Alabama
Maria CantwellDemocrat · Washington
Kevin CramerRepublican · North Dakota
Catherine Cortez MastoDemocrat · Nevada
Kirsten GillibrandDemocrat · New York
John HickenlooperDemocrat · Colorado
Mazie HironoDemocrat · Hawaii
Ron JohnsonRepublican · Wisconsin
James JusticeRepublican · West Virginia
Mark KellyDemocrat · Arizona
Angus KingIndependent · Maine
Jeff MerkleyDemocrat · Oregon
Alex PadillaDemocrat · California
Bernie SandersIndependent · Vermont
Jeanne ShaheenDemocrat · New Hampshire
Tim ScottRepublican · South Carolina
Ron WydenDemocrat · Oregon
Sheldon WhitehouseDemocrat · Rhode Island
Todd YoungRepublican · Indiana