Eric Schmitt (R-MO)
A resolution recognizing and honoring Meriwether Lewis and William Clark, and the Corps of Discovery, for their expedition to explore the Louisiana Purchase.
A Republican resolution with no cosponsors
Last activity — Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S2296-2297; text: CR S2308)
Adopted
The chamber formally agreed to it, and for a resolution that is the finish line: what it says is now officially the chamber's position, rule or tribute.
Nothing more is needed. A resolution is how a chamber speaks for itself or sets its own rules, so adopting it is what puts it into effect. It is not a law, so there is nothing for the President to sign.
Its path through Congress
- Introduced
- Officially Recorded
- Adopted by the Senate unanimous consent
A Senate resolution is the Senate speaking for itself: stating a position, honouring someone, or setting its own rules. Adopting it is the whole process. Once the Senate agrees to it, it is officially the Senate's word; it is not a law, so the House and the President have no part in it.
The Senate by unanimous consent (no one objected, so there was no vote): no senator's position on it was recorded.
What this bill would do
This Senate resolution recognizes and honors Meriwether Lewis, William Clark, and the Corps of Discovery. It commemorates the 222nd anniversary of their departure from St. Louis, Missouri, on May 14, 1804. The resolution highlights the expedition's role in exploring the Louisiana Purchase and its impact on the nation's history. It acknowledges the hardships faced by the crew and the significant contributions made by various members, including Sacagawea and York. Finally, the resolution celebrates the expedition as a symbol of American spirit and national achievement.
Yes· 3 of 5
- Scored +1
Would Black Americans be better off under this?
The resolution acknowledges the contributions of York, a significant figure in the expedition's history.
- Scored +1
Would Native Americans be better off under this?
The resolution recognizes the assistance provided by Sacagawea during the journey.
- Scored +1
Would women be better off under this?
The resolution highlights the assistance provided by Sacagawea.
The opposite
No question was scored the opposite.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Historical Recognition: The resolution honors the legacy of the Lewis and Clark Expedition and its importance to the history, development, and identity of the United States (Resolution Section 1).
-
Acknowledgment of Contributions: The bill acknowledges the indispensable contributions of all members of the Corps of Discovery, specifically mentioning the assistance provided by Sacagawea and York (Resolution Section 5).
-
Inspiration and Reflection: The resolution encourages all Americans to study and reflect upon the legacy of the expedition and its lasting significance (Resolution Section 9).
Potential Negative Impacts for People
- No negative impacts are identified within the provided text.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Tap or hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Would Black Americans be better off under this? — The resolution acknowledges the contributions of York, a significant figure in the expedition's history. Would Native Americans be better off under this? — The resolution recognizes the assistance provided by Sacagawea during the journey. Would women be better off under this? — The resolution highlights the assistance provided by Sacagawea.
- Education And Technology
- Does this put more money into scientific research? — The resolution honors the scientific observations and geographic records produced during the expedition.
- Social Issues And Justice
- Does this narrow racial gaps in how people are treated? — The resolution specifically acknowledges the indispensable contributions of members like Sacagawea and York.
- 5/14/2026
- Passed/agreed to in Senate: Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent.
- Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S2296-2297; text: CR S2308)
- Bill introduced.