Christopher Coons (D-DE)
A resolution commending the American Chemical Society on the occasion of its 150th anniversary and recognizing its many years of service to the United States.
A Democratic resolution with 2 Republican cosponsors · See all 3 cosponsors
Last activity — Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S2109; text: CR S2135)
Adopted
The chamber formally agreed to it, and for a resolution that is the finish line: what it says is now officially the chamber's position, rule or tribute.
Nothing more is needed. A resolution is how a chamber speaks for itself or sets its own rules, so adopting it is what puts it into effect. It is not a law, so there is nothing for the President to sign.
Its path through Congress
- Introduced
- Officially Recorded
- Adopted by the Senate unanimous consent
A Senate resolution is the Senate speaking for itself: stating a position, honouring someone, or setting its own rules. Adopting it is the whole process. Once the Senate agrees to it, it is officially the Senate's word; it is not a law, so the House and the President have no part in it.
The Senate by unanimous consent (no one objected, so there was no vote): no senator's position on it was recorded.
What this bill would do
This resolution commemorates the 150th anniversary of the American Chemical Society. It recognizes the organization's history of service and its role in advancing the chemical enterprise through research and publications. The Senate intends to commend the society for its contributions to the scientific, educational, and economic strength of the United States. Additionally, the resolution affirms the importance of promoting STEM education and expanding opportunities for students. Finally, it requests that the Secretary of the Senate transmit a copy of the resolution to the leaders of the American Chemical Society.
Yes· 3 of 12
- Scored +2
Would students be better off under this?
The resolution affirms the expansion of educational opportunities for students in STEM fields.
- Scored +1
Would children be better off under this?
The resolution encourages youth from all communities to pursue careers in scientific disciplines.
- Scored +1
Would people in their twenties and thirties be better off under this?
The bill focuses on expanding opportunities for students to pursue chemistry and related fields.
The opposite
No question was scored the opposite.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Recognition of Economic and Scientific Contributions: The resolution recognizes that the American Chemical Society has contributed to the scientific, educational, and economic strength of the United States (Resolution Section 2).
-
Support for STEM Education: The Senate affirms the importance of promoting science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) education (Resolution Section 3).
-
Educational Opportunities for Students: The resolution aims to expand opportunities for students to pursue chemistry and related fields (Resolution Section 3).
-
Inclusion of Diverse Communities: The resolution encourages youth from all communities to pursue careers in scientific disciplines (Resolution Section 3).
Potential Negative Impacts for People
- No negative impacts are mentioned in the text.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Tap or hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Would students be better off under this? — The resolution affirms the expansion of educational opportunities for students in STEM fields. Would children be better off under this? — The resolution encourages youth from all communities to pursue careers in scientific disciplines. Would households on low incomes be better off under this? — The bill seeks to encourage youth from all communities to pursue scientific careers. Would people in their twenties and thirties be better off under this? — The bill focuses on expanding opportunities for students to pursue chemistry and related fields.
- Economy And Finance
- Is this likely to grow the economy? — The bill notes that chemical research and development continues to generate economic growth. Is this likely to create jobs? — The resolution recognizes that innovations in chemical research and development generate employment across numerous industries.
- Education And Technology
- Does this reduce what student borrowers owe or repay? — The bill affirms the importance of expanding educational opportunities for students to pursue chemistry and related fields. Does this put more money into scientific research? — The resolution recognizes the importance of fostering research and advancing the chemical enterprise.
- Environment Energy And Infrastructure
- Does this better protect air, water and wildlife? — The resolution highlights the American Chemical Society's leadership in promoting environmental stewardship.
- Healthcare
- Does this make the country readier for the next outbreak? — The resolution mentions chemistry as a critical foundation for addressing global challenges in public health.
- National Security And Foreign Policy
- Does this better protect the country from computer attacks? — The resolution notes that chemistry is essential for addressing challenges in emerging technologies that impact national security.
- Social Issues And Justice
- Is this likely to lift people out of poverty? — The bill states that chemistry has the power to improve lives and strengthen communities.
- 4/29/2026
- Passed/agreed to in Senate: Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent.
- Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S2109; text: CR S2135)
- 3 Cosponsors added.
- Bill introduced.
One bill Congress.gov lists as related to this one — companions in the other chamber, earlier versions, and bills this one absorbed or was folded into.
Shelley CapitoRepublican · West Virginia
Steve DainesRepublican · Montana
Gary PetersDemocrat · Michigan