Christopher Coons (D-DE)
A resolution designating the week of October 19 through 25, 2025, as "National Chemistry Week".
A Democratic resolution with 1 Republican cosponsor · See all 2 cosponsors
Last activity — Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S7755-7756; text: CR S7755)
Adopted
The chamber formally agreed to it, and for a resolution that is the finish line: what it says is now officially the chamber's position, rule or tribute.
Nothing more is needed. A resolution is how a chamber speaks for itself or sets its own rules, so adopting it is what puts it into effect. It is not a law, so there is nothing for the President to sign.
Its path through Congress
- Introduced
- Officially Recorded
- Adopted by the Senate unanimous consent
A Senate resolution is the Senate speaking for itself: stating a position, honouring someone, or setting its own rules. Adopting it is the whole process. Once the Senate agrees to it, it is officially the Senate's word; it is not a law, so the House and the President have no part in it.
The Senate by unanimous consent (no one objected, so there was no vote): no senator's position on it was recorded.
What this bill would do
This resolution designates the week of October 19 through 25, 2025, as National Chemistry Week. It highlights chemistry's role in food science, energy, medicine, and electronics while noting its importance in addressing global challenges and boosting economic growth. The measure aims to educate the public and spark interest among young people and underrepresented groups to study science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. It supports the goals of the 36th annual National Chemistry Week, which has the theme "The Hidden Life of Spices." Finally, the resolution commends the American Chemical Society, the National Organization for the Professional Advancement of Black Chemists and Chemical Engineers, the Society for Advancement of Chicanos/Hispanics and Native Americans in Science, and the American Indian Science and Engineering Society for organizing and engaging in the week's events.
Yes· 3 of 12
- Scored +3
Would students be better off under this?
The resolution recognizes, supports, and encourages students participating in National Chemistry Week and pursuing STEM.
- Scored +2
Would children be better off under this?
The resolution stimulates the interest of young people in studying science and mathematics.
- Scored +2
Would people in their twenties and thirties be better off under this?
Encourages students and young adults to pursue educational and career pathways in STEM fields.
The opposite
No question was scored the opposite.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Encouraging Youth in STEM: Under paragraph (3) of the resolution, the Senate recognizes the need to promote science and technology fields and encourages youth, including those from underrepresented groups, to pursue careers in these areas, which can help open up new job and educational opportunities.
-
Recognizing Organizations: Under paragraph (4) of the resolution, the Senate commends specific groups like the American Chemical Society, the National Organization for the Professional Advancement of Black Chemists and Chemical Engineers, the Society for Advancement of Chicanos/Hispanics and Native Americans in Science, and the American Indian Science and Engineering Society for their work in organizing events and engaging the public.
Potential Negative Impacts for People
- None Identified: The provided text does not contain any sections or provisions that outline potential negative consequences, burdens, or penalties for individuals or groups of people in the United States.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Tap or hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Would students be better off under this? — The resolution recognizes, supports, and encourages students participating in National Chemistry Week and pursuing STEM. Would Black Americans be better off under this? — The resolution specifically commends and highlights the National Organization for the Professional Advancement of Black Chemists and Chemical Engineers. Would children be better off under this? — The resolution stimulates the interest of young people in studying science and mathematics. Would Hispanic Americans be better off under this? — The resolution specifically commends and highlights the Society for Advancement of Chicanos/Hispanics and Native Americans in Science. Would Native Americans be better off under this? — The resolution specifically commends and highlights the American Indian Science and Engineering Society. Would women be better off under this? — The resolution explicitly aims to stimulate the interest of women in studying science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. Would people in their twenties and thirties be better off under this? — Encourages students and young adults to pursue educational and career pathways in STEM fields. Would households on low incomes be better off under this? — Promoting educational and career pathways in STEM can help support upward economic mobility.
- Social Issues And Justice
- Does this narrow the gap between how men and women are treated? — The resolution encourages women and girls to pursue studies and careers in science and mathematics. Does this narrow racial gaps in how people are treated? — The resolution explicitly encourages underrepresented groups, including Black, Hispanic, and Native American individuals, to pursue STEM careers.
- Economy And Finance
- Is this likely to grow the economy? — The resolution highlights how innovations in chemistry spur economic growth. Is this likely to create jobs? — The resolution recognizes the role of chemistry in economic growth and job creation.
- 10/27/2025
- Passed/agreed to in Senate: Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent.
- Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S7755-7756; text: CR S7755)
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- Introduced in Senate
Shelley CapitoRepublican · West Virginia
Gary PetersDemocrat · Michigan