Joni Ernst (R-IA)

A resolution expressing support for the designation of May 2025 as "Motorcycle Safety Awareness Month".

S.Res. 222 · Senate resolution Transportation and Public Works

A Republican resolution with 1 Democratic cosponsor · See all 3 cosponsors

Last activity — Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S2901; text: CR S2900)

Adopted

The chamber formally agreed to it, and for a resolution that is the finish line: what it says is now officially the chamber's position, rule or tribute.

Nothing more is needed. A resolution is how a chamber speaks for itself or sets its own rules, so adopting it is what puts it into effect. It is not a law, so there is nothing for the President to sign.

Its path through Congress

  1. Introduced
  2. Officially Recorded
  3. Adopted by the Senate unanimous consent

A Senate resolution is the Senate speaking for itself: stating a position, honouring someone, or setting its own rules. Adopting it is the whole process. Once the Senate agrees to it, it is officially the Senate's word; it is not a law, so the House and the President have no part in it.

The Senate by unanimous consent (no one objected, so there was no vote): no senator's position on it was recorded.

What this bill would do

This resolution expresses support for designating May 2025 as "Motorcycle Safety Awareness Month." It recognizes motorcycles as a valuable and fuel-efficient part of the United States transportation mix. The resolution notes that the motorcycling community focuses on safety through education and training to decrease crashes. It also highlights that motorcyclists face higher fatality rates than passenger vehicle motorists. Finally, the Senate aims to encourage all road users to share the road safely.

Yes

  • Scored +1

    Does this cut the pollution that drives climate change?

    The bill notes that motorcycles are fuel-efficient and help decrease congestion.

The opposite

  • Scored -1

    Would gun owners be better off under this?

    This resolution does not pertain to the rights or interests of gun owners.