Edward Markey (D-MA)

A resolution designating April 30, 2025, as "National Assistive Technology Awareness Day".

S.Res. 192 · Senate resolution Health

A Democratic resolution with 1 Republican cosponsor · See the cosponsor

Last activity — Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S2710; text: CR S2718)

Adopted

The chamber formally agreed to it, and for a resolution that is the finish line: what it says is now officially the chamber's position, rule or tribute.

Nothing more is needed. A resolution is how a chamber speaks for itself or sets its own rules, so adopting it is what puts it into effect. It is not a law, so there is nothing for the President to sign.

Its path through Congress

  1. Introduced
  2. Officially Recorded
  3. Adopted by the Senate unanimous consent

A Senate resolution is the Senate speaking for itself: stating a position, honouring someone, or setting its own rules. Adopting it is the whole process. Once the Senate agrees to it, it is officially the Senate's word; it is not a law, so the House and the President have no part in it.

The Senate by unanimous consent (no one objected, so there was no vote): no senator's position on it was recorded.

What this bill would do

S. Res. 192 designates April 30, 2025, as ``National Assistive Technology Awareness Day''. The resolution highlights how assistive technology and related services help individuals with disabilities and older adults improve their functional capabilities. It recognizes the importance of these tools for community inclusion, education, and employment. Additionally, the resolution commends the specialists, program coordinators, professional organizations, and researchers who help people access these necessary devices.

Yes· 3 of 18

  • Scored +10

    Would people with disabilities be better off under this?

    The bill is explicitly designed to raise awareness and support for the needs of people with disabilities.

  • Scored +5

    Would people over 65 be better off under this?

    Specifically mentions the high prevalence of disability among older adults and the benefit of assistive technology for them.

  • Scored +5

    Would retired people be better off under this?

    Specifically highlights the importance of these tools for older adults.

The opposite

No question was scored the opposite.