Mazie Hirono (D-HI)
A resolution expressing support for the staff of public, school, academic, and special libraries in the United States and the essential services those libraries provide to communities, recognizing the need for funding commensurate with the broad scope of social service and community supports provided by libraries, preserving the right of all citizens of the United States to freely access information and resources in their communities, supporting a strong union voice for library workers, and defending the civil rights of library staff.
A Democratic resolution with 6 Democratic cosponsors · See all 6 cosponsors
Last activity — Referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions. (text: CR S2568-2569)
In committee
Introduced and handed to a committee in the chamber it started in.
The committee holds it, and most bills are never heard from again. A hearing or a committee vote would be news; silence is the usual outcome, and it kills the bill without anyone voting against it.
Its path through Congress
- Introduced
- In Committee
A Senate resolution is the Senate speaking for itself: stating a position, honouring someone, or setting its own rules. Adopting it is the whole process. Once the Senate agrees to it, it is officially the Senate's word; it is not a law, so the House and the President have no part in it.
What this bill would do
This resolution expresses support for the staff of various types of libraries across the United States. It recognizes libraries as essential providers of social services, community support, and economic resources. The text advocates for funding that matches the broad scope of services libraries offer to their communities. It also seeks to protect the rights of citizens to access information and the rights of library workers to organize. Additionally, the resolution aims to defend the civil rights of library staff against intimidation.
Yes· 3 of 21
- Scored +8
Would union members be better off under this?
The resolution explicitly supports unionization and collective bargaining for library workers.
- Scored +7
Does this protect what people are allowed to say in public life?
The resolution defends the right of library staff to speak out and the public's right to access information without censorship.
- Scored +7
Does this strengthen the rights of workers to organise?
The resolution explicitly supports the right of library workers to organize and collectively bargain.
The opposite
No question was scored the opposite.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Access to Information and Resources: The resolution reaffirms the fundamental right of people to access information and resources within their communities (Section 5A). This includes access to books, media, and the internet, which is especially vital for underserved communities (Whereas clauses).
-
Economic and Social Support: Libraries are recognized as economic powerhouses that provide resources for small business owners, job seekers, and those learning new skills (Whereas clauses). They also serve as a safe haven and resource provider for unhoused individuals and families (Whereas clauses).
-
Public Health and Safety: Library staff provide lifesaving care during crises, such as administering medication for opioid overdoses (Whereas clauses). They also provided essential services during the COVID-19 pandemic, including distributing personal protective equipment and providing testing (Whereas clauses).
-
Worker Protections and Rights: The resolution supports the right of library workers to organize, collectively bargain, and have a protected voice in their workplaces (Section 5B). It also aims to protect the civil rights of staff so they can perform their duties without fear of threats, intimidation, or reprisals (Section 5C and Whereas clauses).
-
Funding for Essential Services: The resolution supports prioritizing full funding for library services at Federal, State, and local levels (Section 4). This is intended to ensure the continuation and improvement of services that are considered critical infrastructure (Section 3 and Whereas clauses).
Potential Negative Impacts for People
- Impact of Eliminating the Institute of Museum and Library Services: The text notes that President Trump signed Executive Order 14238 to eliminate the Institute of Museum and Library Services (Whereas clauses). The resolution states that eliminating this Institute would harm the ability of libraries to provide critical resources, particularly to those in rural, Tribal, and other underserved communities (Whereas clauses).
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Tap or hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Would union members be better off under this? — The resolution explicitly supports unionization and collective bargaining for library workers. Would households on low incomes be better off under this? — Libraries provide essential internet and social service access for underserved communities. Would students be better off under this? — The resolution supports access to diverse titles and educational resources for students. Would business owners be better off under this? — The resolution identifies libraries as resources that support small business owners. Would children be better off under this? — The resolution supports access to diverse books and programming for young people. Would Native Americans be better off under this? — The text mentions protecting resources for Tribal communities. Would people in rural areas be better off under this? — The resolution highlights the importance of preserving library services for rural communities. Would people in their twenties and thirties be better off under this? — The resolution promotes educational enrichment and information access for younger populations.
- Social Issues And Justice
- Does this protect what people are allowed to say in public life? — The resolution defends the right of library staff to speak out and the public's right to access information without censorship. Does this make housing cost less? — The resolution notes libraries serve as a safe haven and resource provider for unhoused individuals and families. Does this narrow racial gaps in how people are treated? — The resolution emphasizes supporting underserved, rural, and Tribal communities through library resources. Is this likely to reduce homelessness? — It recognizes libraries as a vital resource and safe haven for unhoused populations.
- Healthcare
- Does this do more about addiction and overdose deaths? — It recognizes library staff's role in administering medication to treat opioid overdoses. Does this make the country readier for the next outbreak? — The resolution notes the essential role libraries played in distributing PPE and testing during the COVID-19 pandemic. Does this make health care easier to get in general? — The text highlights library staff's role in providing lifesaving care during the opioid epidemic.
- Economy And Finance
- Does this strengthen the rights of workers to organise? — The resolution explicitly supports the right of library workers to organize and collectively bargain. Does this make it easier to run a small business? — The resolution recognizes libraries as economic powerhouses providing resources to small business owners.
- Education And Technology
- Does this get reliable internet to more people? — The resolution emphasizes the role of libraries in providing equitable internet access to underserved communities. Does this put more money into public schools? — The resolution supports full funding for school libraries and diverse book offerings.
- Governance And Ideology
- Does this protect the individual right to speak freely? — The text defends the right to access information and protects library workers' rights to speak on public concerns.
- Environment Energy And Infrastructure
- Does this invest in rural communities? — The resolution highlights the importance of library resources for rural communities.
- 4/29/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 4/10/2025
- Referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions. (text: CR S2568-2569)
- 5 Cosponsors added.
- Introduced in Senate
4 bills Congress.gov lists as related to this one — companions in the other chamber, earlier versions, and bills this one absorbed or was folded into.
- 119-HRES-328: Expressing support for the staff of public, school, academic, and special libraries in the United States and the essential services those libraries provide to communities, recognizing the need for funding commensurate with the broad scope of social service and community supports provided by libraries, preserving the right of all citizens of the United States to freely access information and resources in their communities, supporting a strong union voice for library workers, and defending the civil rights of library staff.
- 119-HRES-1212: Expressing support for the staff of public, school, academic, and special libraries in the United States and the essential services those libraries provide to communities, recognizing the need for funding commensurate with the broad scope of social service and community supports provided by libraries, preserving the right of all citizens of the United States to freely access information and resources in their communities, supporting a strong union voice for library workers, and defending the civil rights of library staff.
- 119-SRES-688: A resolution expressing support for the staff of public, school, academic, and special libraries in the United States and the essential services those libraries provide to communities, recognizing the need for funding commensurate with the broad scope of social service and community supports provided by libraries, preserving the right of all citizens of the United States to freely access information and resources in their communities, supporting a strong union voice for library workers, and defending the civil rights of library staff.
- 118-SRES-637 (not yet synced)
Lisa Blunt RochesterDemocrat · Delaware
Richard DurbinDemocrat · Illinois
Alex PadillaDemocrat · California
John ReedDemocrat · Rhode Island
Chris Van HollenDemocrat · Maryland
Ron WydenDemocrat · Oregon