Cynthia Lummis (R-WY)
A joint resolution providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Bureau of Land Management relating to "Buffalo Field Office Record of Decision and Approved Resource Management Plan Amendment".
A Republican resolution with 1 Republican cosponsor · See the cosponsor
Last activity — Indefinitely postponed by Senate by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S8395)
Introduced, nothing more yet
Formally proposed, and not yet handed to a committee.
Nearly every bill is sent to a committee within days. Introduction alone is not a sign of support, of momentum, or of any likelihood of passing — any member may introduce any bill.
Its path through Congress
- Introduced
How Congress voted
- See who voted how →A vote on whether to start debating something · 11/19/2025
What this bill would do
S.J. Res. 89 is a joint resolution to disapprove of a rule submitted by the Bureau of Land Management. The rule in question is the "Buffalo Field Office Record of Decision and Approved Resource Management Plan Amendment." If passed, this resolution would ensure that the specified rule has no force or effect.
Yes
No question was scored yes.
The opposite
- Scored -3
Does this better protect air, water and wildlife?
Nullifying a resource management plan may reduce specific local environmental protections provided by that plan.
- Scored -2
Does this better protect public land such as parks and forests?
The resolution removes a specific Record of Decision and Resource Management Plan intended to manage public lands in the Buffalo Field Office.
- Scored -2
Does this give the federal government more power?
The resolution uses the Congressional Review Act to limit the authority of a federal agency (BLM).
What Congress actually voted on
One recorded vote has been taken on this bill.
None of them settled the bill — every vote so far has been about whether to keep going.
- The Senate: a vote on whether to start debating something This decides only whether the chamber takes the measure up at all. Nothing about the measure itself has been decided when it passes. Motion to Proceed Agreed to 51 yes · 47 no
11/19/2025 · Roll call 621 · recorded as “On the Motion to Proceed S.J.Res. 89”
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
- Removal of the BLM Rule: The resolution seeks to ensure the "Buffalo Field Office Record of Decision and Approved Resource Management Plan Amendment" has no force or effect.
Potential Negative Impacts for People
- Cancellation of the Amendment: The resolution would stop the "Buffalo Field Office Record of Decision and Approved Resource Management Plan Amendment" from being in effect.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Tap or hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Environment Energy And Infrastructure
- Does this better protect air, water and wildlife? — Nullifying a resource management plan may reduce specific local environmental protections provided by that plan. Does this better protect public land such as parks and forests? — The resolution removes a specific Record of Decision and Resource Management Plan intended to manage public lands in the Buffalo Field Office.
- Governance And Ideology
- Does this give the federal government more power? — The resolution uses the Congressional Review Act to limit the authority of a federal agency (BLM).
- 11/20/2025
- Indefinitely postponed by Senate by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S8395)
- 11/19/2025
- Motion to proceed to consideration of measure agreed to in Senate by Yea-Nay Vote. 51 - 47. Record Vote Number: 621.
- Measure laid before Senate by motion.
- 11/18/2025
- Senate Committee on Energy and Natural Resources discharged, by petition, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 802(c).
- Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 270.
- 10/8/2025
- Read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- Introduced in Senate
One bill Congress.gov lists as related to this one — companions in the other chamber, earlier versions, and bills this one absorbed or was folded into.
John BarrassoRepublican · Wyoming