Cynthia Lummis (R-WY)

A joint resolution providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Bureau of Land Management relating to "Buffalo Field Office Record of Decision and Approved Resource Management Plan Amendment".

S.J.Res. 89 · Senate resolution Public Lands and Natural Resources

A Republican resolution with 1 Republican cosponsor · See the cosponsor

Last activity — Indefinitely postponed by Senate by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S8395)

Introduced, nothing more yet

Formally proposed, and not yet handed to a committee.

Nearly every bill is sent to a committee within days. Introduction alone is not a sign of support, of momentum, or of any likelihood of passing — any member may introduce any bill.

Its path through Congress

  1. Introduced

How Congress voted

What this bill would do

S.J. Res. 89 is a joint resolution to disapprove of a rule submitted by the Bureau of Land Management. The rule in question is the "Buffalo Field Office Record of Decision and Approved Resource Management Plan Amendment." If passed, this resolution would ensure that the specified rule has no force or effect.

Yes

No question was scored yes.

The opposite

  • Scored -3

    Does this better protect air, water and wildlife?

    Nullifying a resource management plan may reduce specific local environmental protections provided by that plan.

  • Scored -2

    Does this better protect public land such as parks and forests?

    The resolution removes a specific Record of Decision and Resource Management Plan intended to manage public lands in the Buffalo Field Office.

  • Scored -2

    Does this give the federal government more power?

    The resolution uses the Congressional Review Act to limit the authority of a federal agency (BLM).

What Congress actually voted on

One recorded vote has been taken on this bill.

None of them settled the bill — every vote so far has been about whether to keep going.

  • The Senate: a vote on whether to start debating something This decides only whether the chamber takes the measure up at all. Nothing about the measure itself has been decided when it passes. Motion to Proceed Agreed to 51 yes · 47 no

    See who voted how →

    11/19/2025 · Roll call 621 · recorded as “On the Motion to Proceed S.J.Res. 89”